Ben Wheatley: ‘I didn’t get anywhere with film… | Little White Lies

Interviews

Ben Wheat­ley: I didn’t get any­where with film until I stopped caring’

29 Mar 2017

Words by Adam Woodward

Portrait of a man with a beard and facial markings against a dark background.
Portrait of a man with a beard and facial markings against a dark background.
The Free Fire writer/​director opens up about his colour­ful past, and why he’s des­per­ate to make a rom-com.

It’s set in Boston, Mass­a­chu­setts and boasts a multi­na­tion­al cast, but Free Fire marks a home­com­ing of sorts for British writer/​director Ben Wheat­ley. Specif­i­cal­ly, it’s the first occa­sion since 2009 that he has shot a fea­ture in his adopt­ed home­town of Brighton, hav­ing pre­vi­ous­ly filmed in Belfast for High-Rise, Sheffield for Kill List, across Der­byshire, North York­shire and the Lake Dis­trict for Sight­seers, and in a field in Eng­land for A Field in Eng­land. He moved down from Lon­don a lit­tle over 20 years ago to attend uni­ver­si­ty, and it’s been his base, along with his screen­writ­ing part­ner and wife, Amy Jump, ever since.

Free Fire isn’t a Brighton film, but as with Wheatley’s micro-bud­get debut, Down Ter­race, some­thing of the unique char­ac­ter of this vibrant city by the sea seems to infuse every frame. Per­haps it’s some­thing to do with the fact that the sin­gle loca­tion set­ting, an enor­mous old ware­house on the out­skirts of the city, adjoins the for­mer HQ of the region’s only dai­ly news­pa­per. Or maybe it’s because, after a long day shoot­ing in (and shoot­ing up) said ware­house, the cast and crew would hang out in one of Brighton’s many tra­di­tion­al tav­erns, sink­ing a few suds and soak­ing up the local culture.

When LWLies spent an after­noon with Wheat­ley in Brighton – vis­it­ing the Free Fire set, sift­ing through crates of sec­ond-hand vinyl and grab­bing a quick drink at the pub where Brie Lar­son, Armie Ham­mer, Jack Reynor and co bond­ed – it struck us that this place is as much an exten­sion of Wheat­ley as he is of it. Both city and direc­tor share a cre­ative, free-think­ing, live-and-let-live out­look, each has its own colour­ful his­to­ry, and both offer some­thing a lit­tle dif­fer­ent – some­thing edgi­er and more unpre­dictable – from the norm. But if we’re view­ing Ben Wheat­ley films as prod­ucts of their envi­ron­ment, it’s worth not­ing that his sto­ry begins not on the south coast or in the UK cap­i­tal but in a small com­muter town in Essex…

A heavily-tattooed man with a fearsome facial expression, depicted with white outlines against a dark background.

LWLies: You were born in Bil­ler­icay in Essex, which most peo­ple will know from the Ian Dury song. What was it like grow­ing up there?

It’s quite an inter­est­ing place in a way. The only cul­tur­al ref­er­ence points for it are Bil­ler­icay Dick­ie’ and also Gavin & Stacey, because Gavin comes from Bil­ler­icay. It’s also where the Pil­grim found­ing fathers gath­ered on their way to the Mayflower – some Bil­ler­icay blokes actu­al­ly went off to Amer­i­ca. For such a lit­tle place to have such as impor­tant bit of his­to­ry snake through it, it’s kind of a weird thing when you think about it. Billericay’s got a twin town in Amer­i­ca that’s famous for hav­ing the first per­son killed in the Amer­i­can Civ­il War.

Are you into your history?

Not real­ly my fam­i­ly his­to­ry so much, but I’m inter­est­ed in where I grew up. Peo­ple tend to be quite snide towards Essex, but I’m proud of where I’m from. When you meet oth­er peo­ple from Essex there’s a shared sense of humour and a shared out­look which you can recog­nise. I was lucky to grow up in a sub­ur­ban envi­ron­ment, but mov­ing to Lon­don made me quite dis­lo­cat­ed from that. We moved to Bel­size Park and I went to Haver­stock School which is just oppo­site Chalk Farm sta­tion. Quite an inter­est­ing school it turns out. It’s since been rebuilt as an acad­e­my but at the time it was like an old Vic­to­ri­an com­pre­hen­sive. There were some weird peo­ple there. The Milibands went there; Ed was in the year above me at school. The papers used to call it Red Eton’ but it was about as far from fuck­ing Eton as you could get.

Did you have a sense back then of what you want­ed to do when you left school?

I didn’t real­ly know what I was gonna do the whole way through my A‑levels. That’s when I ran into Amy Jump and she told me to go to art school, which I hadn’t real­ly con­sid­ered as an option. She did a foun­da­tion course so I applied for the same one. I could draw rea­son­ably well but I was prob­a­bly being lined up to be a painter-dec­o­ra­tor or some­thing. I was writ­ing at the time but I was a bit bohemi­an, long hair and all that. I’d always drawn com­ic strips but I didn’t real­ly under­stand any­thing about film. I want­ed to make some­thing and I got hold of a Video8 cam­corder and filmed some bits and pieces, but the tech­nol­o­gy still seemed too advanced and com­pli­cat­ed. But when I went to Brighton [Uni­ver­si­ty] I did a mod­ule on video pro­duc­tion and the AV depart­ment had an edit suite where you could hire cam­eras and book out the space. I spent my time doing that and basi­cal­ly taught myself how to make films.

What sort of stuff were you edit­ing at that time?

I start­ed film­ing just… stuff. I did a film called Things in My House where I just filmed all my books and shit like that and then edit­ed it. Real­ly, real­ly rudi­men­ta­ry stuff. Then I start­ed film­ing bits of dra­ma and even­tu­al­ly I began edit­ing stuff for oth­er peo­ple, tak­ing films apart and recut­ting them. I even­tu­al­ly start­ed doing more com­pli­cat­ed short films and worked with Robin Hill – who’s in Down Ter­race – and his broth­er, Dan, and their friends, Mike and Andy Hurst. They were at sixth form and had a more tra­di­tion­al, Spiel­berg-style, mak­ing-movies-since-they-were-10 back­ground. They did all these real­ly com­plex remakes of Stal­lone and Van Damme movies – they would do stuff like set them­selves on re and blow stuff up. The four of them were pret­ty industrious.

I worked on a fea­ture they made in 1997 called Project: Assas­sin, which was like a Cro­nen­ber­gian, brain­worm, some­one-get­ting-mur­dered-in-a-squat type movie. It was amaz­ing because none of these guys came from a film back­ground. They just made this thing and even­tu­al­ly took it to Cannes and ran into some guy in a bar and got dis­tri­b­u­tion for it. When­ev­er I speak to young direc­tors now I tell them you’ve got to do it off your own back because oth­er­wise you’re not gonna get any­where. Every­one looks at you like you’re insane because they’re trained to apply for mon­ey and they’re con­di­tioned into think­ing that it’s all fair and everyone’s fair and every­one gets a go. That wasn’t our experience.

What hap­pened after that?

Robin and Andy went off to LA and made anoth­er film called You’re Dead with John Hurt and Rhys Ifans. It didn’t go very well. I worked on the script with Robin and we were sup­posed to get paid for it but it didn’t hap­pen. It was hor­ri­ble. I went, That’s it, I’m done’. I was young and I felt under a lot of pres­sure. So I stopped. I stopped writ­ing and I end­ed up get­ting a job in a mar­ket­ing com­pa­ny. Amy and I were just pot­ter­ing around real­ly. It got to a point where one of us had to go to work and I thought, Fuck it, I’ll do it’. But we were hap­py doing our own thing real­ly. The fun­ny thing is I didn’t get any­where with film until I stopped car­ing about it and just relaxed a bit.

How did that lead to you start­ing your blog?

The mar­ket­ing com­pa­ny I worked for went bust. I tried to get anoth­er job and I couldn’t because the dot com crash had just hap­pened and there was no work, so I had to retrain. Had about 20 grand in sav­ings. Amy was preg­nant and I decid­ed I would try and get into the video game indus­try. At the same time we start­ed post­ing stuff online, wast­ing time mak­ing flash ani­ma­tions. Back then there were no YouTube algo­rithms decid­ing what peo­ple watched. You could direct­ly plug into an online audi­ence. First it would be a few hun­dred peo­ple, then we post­ed a cou­ple of things that got seen by a few thou­sand peo­ple and I thought, Wow, this is real­ly amazing!’

That turned to hun­dreds of thou­sands and then mil­lions. By pure fuck­ing luck and good for­tune, I man­aged to get a job doing some­thing while I was fuck­ing around try­ing to do some­thing else. They were real­ly des­per­ate times though. There was one month where we were lit­er­al­ly a day away from hav­ing to default on our mort­gage, and I got a phone call con­firm­ing a job to do some viral stuff for an extreme sports chan­nel. That was the turn­ing point. After that it got much easier.

Surreal skull-like figure emerging from dark, starry background with ghostly white outlines of human forms.

Do you ever reflect on that peri­od in your lives?

It cer­tain­ly informs a lot of the work I’ve done. I always get asked things like, Why do you do so much stuff?’ I love what I do but it’s also because it all feels so lucky that it even hap­pened at all. Those days were fun as well, the inter­net back then was like the Wild West in a way. At the height of it I was mak­ing two or three things a day, and you could almost feel the pulse of the inter­net. But as soon as you stepped away it became like a for­eign coun­try again. Every­thing moved so fast.

To what extent did that ear­ly work inform your film­mak­ing style?

Cer­tain­ly the com­pres­sion of infor­ma­tion and sto­ry­telling side of it. It’s also hav­ing con­fi­dence in your own voice and just going, Fuck it, I’m gonna do this and I don’t care.’ When I was doing the online viral stuff, you’d pitch the ideas and do the cre­ative side of it but you’d also have to deliv­er the post-pro­duc­tion. The thing about the net back then was the audi­ence was so open-mind­ed. It’s dif­fer­ent now, they’re more bit­ter – or maybe the bit­ter­ness was always there, it’s just come to the sur­face. One of my per­verse plea­sures is to scroll through the com­ments on Amer­i­can polit­i­cal sites just to see what’s going on.

You’re fair­ly active on Twitter…

Most­ly I just share stuff I like. I went through my Twit­ter feed recent­ly, mut­ing any­body talk­ing about pol­i­tics. I’ve just had enough. My atti­tude is to always be encour­ag­ing, be as pos­i­tive and as con­struc­tive as pos­si­ble. Peo­ple are too quick to form an opin­ion and to judge. It’s a scram­ble up the hill to the moral high ground isn’t it? I don’t do Face­book though, haven’t done for years. I remem­ber Face­book hit when I was at the BBC doing The Wrong Door and I only real­ly joined to see who knew who. I lost inter­est pret­ty quick­ly after that. And I don’t real­ly post to my blog anymore.

Why did you stop that?

It was one day when it was real­ly hard to upload a pic­ture for some rea­son, the code had stopped work­ing or some­thing, and I’d just had enough of it. But that’s what hap­pened, it was web­sites and then it moved to blogs and now it’s all on Twit­ter. Peo­ple send tweets like they’re emails or texts, I find that real­ly bizarre.

What sort of offers were you get­ting off the back of the viral stuff?

Most­ly stuff for TV com­pa­nies. I edit­ed the Mod­ern Toss pilot and I did all the extras for the Big Night Out DVD. I start­ed doing ads as well, so that was all going on at the same time. Then Joe [Cor­nish] decid­ed he didn’t want to do Mod­ern Toss any more so they asked me to direct it, which was a major break real­ly. Then Arman­do Ian­nuc­ci replied to an email I’d sent about a year ear­li­er. They were doing Time Trum­pet and invit­ed me to come in and have chat. I thought, Fuck!’ So I scrib­bled down some ideas on a sheet of A4 – one-lin­ers, that sort of thing. When the series aired lots of those jokes had made it in so I wrote them to ask about get­ting paid and they were like, Oh yeah, here’s a cheque’. Again, Fuck!’ Then The Wrong Door came along which was a crazy expe­ri­ence, and then I did Ide­al with John­ny Vegas. But I want­ed to do more dra­ma. My agent sug­gest­ed I do a short film so we did that, then Robin and I got togeth­er and expand­ed it into a fea­ture, which became Down Terrace.

Do you still draw?

I did all the ini­tial sto­ry­boards for Free Fire. I tend to draw the whole film out just to get a feel for it. I’ll sketch it out real­ly rough­ly and then I’ll usu­al­ly get some­one else to redraw every­thing. That’s what we did on Free Fire and High-Rise. On Freak­shift, which is a sci-fi thing we’ve been work­ing on, Mick McMa­hon has been draw­ing stuff. Sto­ry­board­ing is the cheap­est way of mak­ing the film and it forces you to real­ly think about it. The thing about movies is, cars blow­ing up and guns going off is big tick­et imagery, you can sit there and imag­ine it in your head. What’s real­ly hard is all the bor­ing stuff like peo­ple com­ing through doors or some­one going up some stairs. I’ll spend a lot of time work­ing all that stuff out. Of course, there’s always a cer­tain degree of dys­mor­phia, where you imag­ine some­thing is bet­ter than it is or you don’t see the prob­lems with it.

Has that process got­ten any easier?

There’s more of a bal­ance there work­ing with Amy, because she’s so bru­tal­ly hon­est. I like the fact that we’re a cou­ple mak­ing films, it makes it inter­est­ing. And I like the fact that I get to spend time with her that I prob­a­bly wouldn’t oth­er­wise. She’s com­plete­ly out­side of the indus­try, she doesn’t do inter­views and doesn’t par­tic­u­lar­ly like going up to Lon­don to events. She just wants to do the work, get in and get out. She’s not a cinephile, but she real­ly cares about image and sto­ry­telling from her own unique per­spec­tive. But we’ve always had an agree­ment that I’ll be kind of like the face of it, I do all the press and that.

It’s quite weird going from nev­er hav­ing been inter­viewed before to being inter­viewed 500 times. Sud­den­ly peo­ple are writ­ing down what you’re say­ing, they’re record­ing it and putting online. We lucked out with Down Ter­race because peo­ple were real­ly kind about it – it was a first film and low bud­get, we felt we’d been giv­en the ben­e­fit of the doubt. With Kill List, I thought crit­i­cal­ly we were gonna get real­ly fucked. But it didn’t hap­pen. It’s a very weird film, you know. And it’s a mean film, it’s much mean­er than most movies are. I watch a lot of mod­ern hor­ror movies and they’re scary, but they’re not mean like that.

A dark, distorted face with a menacing expression and sharp, monstrous features against a black background.

What sort of stuff scares you?

I got the Alan Clarke boxset recent­ly and I was watch­ing Beloved Ene­my, which is a film about a busi­ness deal, and it’s just hor­ri­ble, ter­ri­fy­ing to watch. Or Adam Cur­tis. Now that’s scary stuff. The only prob­lem is when he veers into a sub­ject I actu­al­ly know some­thing about and I think, Hang on, woah woah woah, that’s not right…’

He’s some­one who’s found a new lease of life through online plat­forms like BBC iPlay­er. Do you see things mov­ing more in that direc­tion, dis­tri­b­u­tion wise?

The prob­lem is it’s hard to make your mon­ey back that way. You look at A Field in Eng­land, it cost £300,000 but only made $30,000 in the US so it’s seen as a mas­sive fail­ure. But in the UK it opened simul­ta­ne­ous­ly in cin­e­mas and on TV and a mil­lion peo­ple saw it on the first week­end. So it depends what your per­spec­tive is. You always wor­ry about the mon­ey side of things but if you can guar­an­tee an audi­ence that’s the most impor­tant thing. Now A Field in Eng­land screens every cou­ple of weeks up and down the coun­try, and in a way that’s more excit­ing because it means there’s a grass­roots fol­low­ing there. For me it was always sup­posed to be the kind of thing you’d dis­cov­er on late-night Chan­nel 4 and go, Fuck, I can’t believe this has been made’. But I know it’s not for every­one. I think the Lit­tle White Lies review said it was like being punched in the face by your best friend…

How did that make you feel?

I thought it was great! We always knew it would be dif­fi­cult – it’s a black-and-white film about the Eng­lish Civ­il War… you’re already fucked. What I’ve learned is that each expe­ri­ence is dif­fer­ent and there’s an audi­ence for every­thing, but peo­ple will only walk a cer­tain dis­tance to go to the cin­e­ma. You either need to have lots of screens or you need lots of adver­tis­ing to tell peo­ple it’s on, and if there’s a foot­ball match on or the weather’s nice then you’re fucked. That’s the cold real­i­ty of it. But the thing with putting movies in cin­e­mas is, you’re not part of some busi­ness scheme for some chan­nel that’s try­ing to change its audi­ence by stick­ing you up there as an exper­i­ment, and not releas­ing the sales fig­ures either.

Do you see your­self make big­ger’ films mov­ing forward?

I think so. But if I can do small­er scale stuff and if it makes sense to then I will, because the actu­al expe­ri­ence of mak­ing A Field of Eng­land was as fun as mak­ing High-Rise or Free Fire.

Would you ever want to make, say, a Mar­vel movie?

I dun­no. I don’t real­ly know how those things work. Mar­vel Zom­bies’ hasn’t been done which is what I’m inter­est­ed in. Maybe that’s a bit too niche. Marvel’s inter­est­ing in that it’s kind of a hybrid of cin­e­ma and tele­vi­sion. A very, very expen­sive TV show that you buy a pass for every three months. If I’m doing big­ger stuff I try to mit­i­gate against any con­fu­sion on the part of the peo­ple I’m work­ing with. That’s why I sto­ry­board as much as pos­si­ble, so every­one knows what to expect and there’s no con­fu­sion. That’s when it all falls to pieces. If you’re all in agree­ment from the start then you can prob­a­bly stop that shit from happening.

What have you got lined up next?

We’re doing Freak­shift next, which is some­thing we’ve been devel­op­ing since Kill List. We couldn’t get it financed it then because it’s got a female lead and at that point there weren’t many women-based action movies about. You know, either you’ve got Char­l­ize Theron or you don’t get the mon­ey. And then I’m work­ing on Hard Boiled which is a Frank Miller adap­ta­tion. Then Wages of Fear, which we’ve just fin­ished the script on so that’s ready to go. At any giv­en time we’ll usu­al­ly have six or sev­en scripts on the go, but they’ll be first drafts and they’ll go in the draw­er and then you’ll come back to them. Or maybe you won’t. You can’t be pre­cious about this stuff.

So what’s on the back­burn­er right now?

Oh, tonnes of stuff. Some com­e­dy and about three sci-fi/­fan­ta­sy films – we’ve got a script which is an adap­ta­tion of Gaunt­let’, the 80s video game. And we’ve been try­ing to do a rom-com for a long time now.

What would a Ben Wheat­ley rom-com look like?

I dun­no yet, we haven’t writ­ten it. I think it will end up being more Amy’s film. We both real­ly love What’s Up, Doc? – if we could do a film that was vague­ly close to that world then we’d be hap­py. It’s charm­ing and hap­py but you’ve also got gang­sters in it. I’ve been try­ing a lot of dif­fer­ent writ­ing exer­cis­es recent­ly, like what if you write a sto­ry where no one dies or the con­flict doesn’t end in vio­lence? It keeps you fresh and it stops you from repeat­ing yourself.

Are you wary of burn­ing out?

Well, you wan­na keep mak­ing as many films as you can but last year was tough. To do two movies back to back was real­ly hard, espe­cial­ly when High-Rise was in post and the final bits of finance for Free Fire were being worked out. I kept diaries a bit dur­ing that time and read­ing some of them back now… it was just the stress of it, you know. I worked on those movies for almost three years solid­ly. That’s about as extreme as I’d like to get with it, but we’ve had a bit of a gap now in between shoot­ing Free Fire and the next one, so I’m ready to go again. It’s hard though, you want to keep work­ing but you do need to give your­self breath­ing space some­times. The prob­lem is there’s nev­er enough time. I don’t think I’ll ever get to make all the things I want to make.

Free Fire is in cin­e­mas 24 March. Read more in LWLies 69.

You might like

Accessibility Settings

Text

Applies the Open Dyslexic font, designed to improve readability for individuals with dyslexia.

Applies a more readable font throughout the website, improving readability.

Underlines links throughout the website, making them easier to distinguish.

Adjusts the font size for improved readability.

Visuals

Reduces animations and disables autoplaying videos across the website, reducing distractions and improving focus.

Reduces the colour saturation throughout the website to create a more soothing visual experience.

Increases the contrast of elements on the website, making text and interface elements easier to distinguish.