Masters of War: Martin McDonagh on Frances… | Little White Lies

Interviews

Mas­ters of War: Mar­tin McDon­agh on Frances McDormand

09 Jan 2018

Words by Adam Woodward

Illustration showing a quaint town with houses, trees, roads, and various other elements. Vibrant colours, including blues, reds, and neutrals, create a whimsical and charming composition.
Illustration showing a quaint town with houses, trees, roads, and various other elements. Vibrant colours, including blues, reds, and neutrals, create a whimsical and charming composition.
The British writer/​director extols the many virtues of the star of his new film, Three Bill­boards Out­side Ebbing, Missouri.

Think of the films of Mar­tin McDon­agh and the term strong women’ prob­a­bly doesn’t spring to mind. His third fea­ture, Three Bill­boards Out­side Ebbing, Mis­souri, could even be mis­con­strued as a box-tick­ing exer­cise, giv­en that it arrives off the back of two decid­ed­ly male-cen­tric movies, In Bruges and Sev­en Psy­chopaths, at a time when female nar­ra­tives are in high demand. And yet com­plex, com­pelling hero­ines have been a fix­ture of McDonagh’s work from the very start – his debut play from 1996, The Beau­ty Queen of Leenane’, cen­tres on the destruc­tive rela­tion­ship between a depres­sive fortysome­thing and her manip­u­la­tive elder­ly mother.

McDon­agh wrote Three Bill­boards eight years ago, and always had Frances McDor­mand in mind for the lead role. She was hes­i­tant at first, how­ev­er, if only because she thought it unlike­ly that a blue-col­lar mom in her late fifties from south­ern Mis­souri would have teenage kids. Here’s the thing about Mil­dred Hayes though: she’s not like oth­er peo­ple. As with McDor­mand her­self, she does things a lit­tle dif­fer­ent­ly, play­ing by her own rules and defy­ing any­one with the gall to try and sec­ond guess her next move. That’s how McDon­agh sees it, any­way, as LWLies found out when we spoke to him.

LWLies: This is the first female lead you’ve writ­ten in a while.

McDon­agh: Yeah. There’s this per­cep­tion that I only do bloke’ movies, but I nev­er felt that was fair. It just so hap­pened that the first two movies I made were very guy-ori­ent­ed. In fact, the script for Three Bill­boards was ready to go at the same time as Sev­en Psy­chos, but the ball was already rolling on that so we did that first. But it’s more than a strong female lead, I think. It feels like one of the strongest char­ac­ters I’ve writ­ten, because it doesn’t fol­low any kind of stereo­typ­i­cal pat­tern of a female lead or a male lead. There’s some­thing quite out­ra­geous­ly dif­fer­ent about her.

Was there any­thing dif­fer­ent about the way you approached writ­ing this character?

Not real­ly. You set her up as being very strong on the first page – the idea of putting those bill­boards up is such a strong action for a per­son any­way – and then you go, Well, what kind of per­son would have done that?’ and it kind of starts writ­ing itself. That force of will and that rage and that pain, they were there before I’d writ­ten the sec­ond page, or a line of dia­logue. Once you’ve start­ed with some­one who is strong and provoca­tive, every next scene they’re in becomes about how oth­er peo­ple react to that. So, if a priest comes into the room, what’s that going to be like? Or if she goes to the den­tist, what hap­pens there? I real­ly didn’t know what she was going to do from scene to scene. I didn’t plot any­thing out. I’m not sure if there real­ly is a struc­ture to the film. It feels like the char­ac­ters just react to each oth­er and that cre­ates the next scene. It’s like a pho­to of some­thing tak­en in between two vio­lent events… perhaps.

And Frances… you wrote the script with her in mind?

Yeah. It had to be some­one who was a num­ber of things: an intel­li­gent actor who wasn’t going to sen­ti­men­talise the part or make it Hol­ly­wood – because Fran’s nev­er been that – but also she’s a work­ing-class char­ac­ter and I didn’t want to patro­n­ise that. She’s a work­ing-class woman from quite a work­ing-class back­ground, so it was very impor­tant to the two of us that we wouldn’t lay it on thick about that stuff.

The joy for Fran was being able to do something that actresses just arent allowed to do

What did Frances bring to the role?

It’s more about what she didn’t bring. Sen­ti­men­tal­i­ty is one of the first things that an actor will want to add. Like, hav­ing the scene and show­ing a ten­der­ness out of a desire to be like­able. To show that maybe she’s not a hardass the whole time, that she’s a lov­ing moth­er real­ly and this is all about grief and pain. But we said that what­ev­er hap­pened in the year between the death of the daugh­ter and when we meet Mil­dred – which we thought was prob­a­bly depres­sion, not get­ting out of bed, all the stuff that can come about as a result of intense grief – we wouldn’t touch on that because the sto­ry we want­ed to tell is about the bill­boards and the anger and the war that she unleash­es. It’s war with­out ten­der­ness. We didn’t want to show the moth­er­ly side, we didn’t want her going to war each day and then when she’s back with her son it’s all lovey-dovey. I guess that’s part of what Fran brought to it – maybe Mil­dred always was a bit of a cow. She’s not nec­es­sar­i­ly a bad moth­er, but she’s a moth­er who fights, argues and is tough. But then maybe she wasn’t always this way…

When you under­stand where that tough­ness comes from, it’s almost out of necessity.

Exact­ly. And with Fran there’s an intel­li­gence – just basic smart choic­es. The cos­tume was all her idea. The ban­dana, the whole out­fit, is like a uni­form. She gets up, puts it on and goes to war every morn­ing. And she nev­er changes, even when she goes on a date. I thought that maybe it could be kind of sweet if it’s the one time she doesn’t wear it, but Fran said, No, it’s war,’ and I’m glad she did because it’s kind of fun­ny that way. Also, there’s a lot of humour in the script, but she nev­er plays any­thing for laughs. She knows it’s fun­ny and I know it’s fun­ny, but there’s nev­er a wink to the audi­ence. Every­thing she does is dead­pan. I think some of the oth­er char­ac­ters are a bit more on the fun­ny side, but noth­ing about her plays up to the com­e­dy. The most impor­tant thing between us was to always remem­ber what hap­pened to the daugh­ter, and even in the edit I had to remem­ber it was a film about that rather than a quirky black com­e­dy. Weird­ly, the laughs almost work bet­ter that way because they’re born out of such hon­esty and tragedy.

Some of the encoun­ters she has with the towns­folk are great. How com­fort­able was Frances with some of those scenes?

She loved kick­ing those kids! She couldn’t get enough of it. I think a lot of the joy of it for Fran was being able to do some­thing that actress­es just aren’t allowed to do. In terms of kick­ing chil­dren, get­ting to do a one-page speech tak­ing apart a priest, and, you know, the den­tist thing, she was very joy­ful on those days I think. With the kids espe­cial­ly. The stunt guys put rub­berised pads on the actors, but it’s still get­ting quite close to the old dodgy areas – but she nev­er held back.

There are some real emo­tion­al moments too. How much do you need to direct an actor like Frances in those moments?

It’s all on the page in terms of dia­logue, but the deer scene, for instance, or the scene on the phone near the end, were the moments where I felt she’s allowed to be more emo­tion­al than any­where else in the film. I thought there could even be tears in those scenes, but Fran was quite adamant that even at those points she couldn’t, or wouldn’t break down. At the time I was think­ing that I’d rather have both options, but she was pret­ty deter­mined that tears weren’t part of it. In ret­ro­spect I think it’s per­fect the way it is.

It’s in the eyes…

You know, I haven’t made that many films, and you can for­get that with good actors there’s some­thing in the eyes. You might not see it on the day, but when you look back at the rush­es after­wards, it’s there, the cam­era gets it. With good actors the cam­era catch­es it – it catch­es some­thing you don’t nec­es­sar­i­ly see.

Was there ever any con­flict between you?

We did go back and forth a lit­tle bit. I like stick­ing com­plete­ly to the script, and she would do that but she would some­times want to cut lines or cut words, and I’m against that.

Who won the major­i­ty of those battles?

I would say I did, she would say she did. I think we were about a week in – it might have been the deer scene actu­al­ly – where I just thought, She’s so good’. There’s no need to fight about five per cent of the script when someone’s tal­ent is so self-evi­dent. But there was also a mutu­al respect there which I think came from our shared the­atre back­ground. I avoid work­ing with cunts any­way. Of course, you do your research into peo­ple or you meet them and you kind of know. I know the peo­ple to avoid. But then there are cer­tain actors who come with a rep­u­ta­tion of being tough, and that can mean any­thing. It can mean just pay­ing atten­tion to the details. I wor­ried that Ralph Fiennes might have been a bit tough to work with, and he wasn’t, he was just real­ly, real­ly spe­cif­ic, almost method about the char­ac­ter. And I love that stuff. I’d rather some­one say, No, I’m not walk­ing down the street unless I’ve got a pass­port in my pock­et because I’ve just come off the plane.’ That’s bril­liant, that’s what you want in an actor.

It’s dif­fer­ent for men and women. It will be eas­i­er for some­one like Col­in Far­rell to find roles in his late fifties.

Exact­ly, which is an issue with the film busi­ness of course. You would hope, though, that with some­thing like this you can break the door open a lit­tle bit. Obvi­ous­ly these things are depen­dent on mak­ing mon­ey, but if this made mon­ey with a 60-year-old woman in the lead you’d hope it could become a tem­plate for oth­ers to fol­low. But there’s no point in break­ing down bound­aries – fem­i­nist ones or gay ones or per­sons-of-colour ones – unless the films are good. The great thing about Moon­light wasn’t that it was an all-black cast, or the gay side of it, but that it was a bril­liant film. That’s what’s got to hap­pen, I think. There’s no point in us all being able to make shit films.

On the mon­ey point, if you’ve got a script with a 60-year-old female lead, is that an instant turn-off for cer­tain financiers?

Yeah, well, unless you stick Julia Roberts in it. Hol­ly­wood loves star­ry’ stars. That’s what ticks the finan­cial box. I’d be hap­py to not make films if I’m not going to get to make them the way I want to. It’s fine, I’ll slink back to the the­atre. I’ve nev­er had mon­ey peo­ple let me do exact­ly what I want­ed to do, and this time we did. Not a note, not even a set vis­it. It was insane. I’d heard that Fox espe­cial­ly had been quite inter­fer­ing in the past, but the peo­ple who are run­ning it now are com­plete­ly easy­go­ing. I guess it’s a bit eas­i­er for me now because they have the script, but they also have the evi­dence of In Bruges. So if they’re smart they’ll trust that it’ll come out okay. Some­times things don’t come out okay, even though you try to make them that way. Sev­en Psy­chos is prob­a­bly that way. I’m glad that this one fol­lowed a dif­fer­ent route.

Three Bill­boards Out­side Ebbing, Mis­souri is released 12 Jan­u­ary. Read more in LWLies 72.

You might like