It’s time for Hollywood to change its attitude… | Little White Lies

Queer Cinema

It’s time for Hol­ly­wood to change its atti­tude towards LGBTQ+ characters

08 Jun 2016

Words by Victoria Luxford

Individuals in military uniform and civilian clothing, with a man in the foreground looking troubled.
Individuals in military uniform and civilian clothing, with a man in the foreground looking troubled.
Social media cam­paigns like #LGBT­Su­per­heroes are expos­ing the movie industry’s wor­ry­ing lack of diversity.

Why are LGBT Super­heroes miss­ing or desex­u­alised in hol­ly­wood block­busters? That’s the ques­tion being posed by #LGBT­Su­per­heroes. The project, start­ed in con­junc­tion with MCM Com­ic Con, aims to high­light the lack of LGBTQ+ char­ac­ters in the Mar­vel and DC Uni­vers­es, point­ing out that cer­tain char­ac­ters who are gay or bisex­u­al in the com­ic books are de-sex­u­alised’ by the time they make it to the big screen.

The trail­er for#LGBTSuperheroes comes hot off the heels of anoth­er hash­tag cam­paign, #Give­Cap­tainAmer­i­caABoyfriend. Some­thing of a hot top­ic among fans on Twit­ter, the title relates to Steve Rogers’ intense­ly close rela­tion­ship with Bucky Barnes, one of the key rea­sons Rogers turns on his fel­low Avengers in the recent Cap­tain Amer­i­ca: Civ­il War. Many have applaud­ed such a promi­nent char­ac­ter in the MCU hav­ing some sex­u­al flu­id­i­ty, while oth­ers have expressed out­rage at the very idea.

What­ev­er the out­come of this ide­o­log­i­cal clash, it does at least point out a star­tling dearth of sex­u­al diver­si­ty in big bud­get stu­dio films. In the first half of 2016 we’ve been intro­duced to over 20 new or reboot­ed char­ac­ters in com­ic book movies, none of whom are acknowl­edged as LGBTQ+. Fur­ther­more, of the major stu­dio releas­es of last year, only Pitch Per­fect 2 fea­tured a gay char­ac­ter of any con­se­quence, while fan the­o­ries sur­round­ing The Force Awak­ens’ Poe Dameron appear to be just that at the moment. As far as we’ve come, films fea­tur­ing mean­ing­ful LGBTQ+ char­ac­ters are still the pre­serve of inde­pen­dent productions.

Are cin­e­ma audi­ences homo­pho­bic? Does the mere pres­ence of a non-straight’ enti­ty send peo­ple run­ning from the mul­ti­plex? Of course not. You only need only to look at The Imi­ta­tion Game to see that a film with a gay char­ac­ter in the lead can be suc­cess­ful. The issue comes down to Hollywood’s dis­com­fort with – and fun­da­men­tal lack of under­stand­ing of – LGBTQ+ issues as a whole. It’s worth men­tion­ing that while there was no con­fu­sion over the sex­u­al­i­ty of Bene­dict Cumberbatch’s Alan Tur­ing, The Imi­ta­tion Game was wide­ly crit­i­cised for play­ing down his homo­sex­u­al­i­ty, instead roman­ti­cis­ing his friend­ship with Kiera Knightley’s Joan Clarke to the point that it took the form of a chaste relationship.

A film can fea­ture a gay char­ac­ter, as long as no one talks about it too much. That’s the mes­sage Hol­ly­wood is con­sis­tent­ly send­ing out. And those that do talk about it tend to incite fear in stu­dios, par­tic­u­lar­ly in Amer­i­ca where the Blu-ray release of Pride failed to fea­ture the words gay” or les­bian” any­where on the box. Then there’s I Love You Phillip Mor­ris. Back in 2008 Jim Car­rey was rid­ing high on the box office suc­cess of Yes Man and Hor­ton Hears a Who!. Phillip Mor­ris saw him play one of America’s most noto­ri­ous con artists, Steven Jay Rus­sell – an inter­est­ing sto­ry with proven direc­tors in Glenn Ficar­ra and John Requa and a bank­able star.

Yet despite pos­i­tive reviews the film’s US release was post­poned indef­i­nite­ly” by the dis­trib­u­tor. While no offi­cial rea­son was ever giv­en, many com­men­ta­tors point­ed to one aspect – Carrey’s char­ac­ter was open­ly gay, and (as the title sug­gests) cen­tral to the film was a love sto­ry between two men. Head­lines even­tu­al­ly prompt­ed a small release in 2010, start­ing on just sev­en screens – by some dis­tance Carrey’s small­est release. In a career that has seen him play a vio­lent schiz­o­phrenic, a bank rob­ber and a gun-tot­ing vig­i­lante, evi­dent­ly play­ing a gay man was a step too far.

Sim­i­lar­ly, films deal­ing with LGBTQ+ issues often suf­fer at awards sea­son. Car­ol notably missed out on a Best Pic­ture nom­i­na­tion at the Acad­e­my Awards (despite fel­low peri­od love sto­ry Brook­lyn mak­ing the cut) and lost out in all six of its nom­i­na­tions, Sean Baker’s Tan­ger­ine missed out on any major award nods despite rave reviews and a high­ly pub­li­cised awards campaign.

All this sug­gests that despite the progress that has undoubt­ed­ly been made, those who hold the pow­er in Hol­ly­wood are still uncom­fort­able with LGBTQ+ sto­ries and char­ac­ters. It is encour­ag­ing, how­ev­er, to learn that audi­ences don’t feel the same way. Over the past few years films like Pride, Love Is Strange and Car­ol have become mod­est suc­cess­es, and while they are unlike­ly to enforce change on their own #LGBT­Su­per­heroes and #Give­Cap­tainAmer­i­caABoyfriend are clear sig­nals that there is an appetite for greater diver­si­ty in main­stream cin­e­ma. It may not arrive as quick­ly as we’d hope, but like all good super­hero movies, there is at least rea­son to hope.

You might like