Velvet Buzzsaw

Review by Hannah Strong @thethirdhan

Directed by

Dan Gilroy


Jake Gyllenhaal Rene Russo Toni Collette


Gyllenhaal reunited with Gilroy sounds like a no-brainer.


A lot going on, but not a lot happening.

In Retrospect.

A rushed and scattershot affair.

Dan Gilroy, Jake Gyllenhaal and Rene Russo reunite for a bizarre mystery horror set in LA’s fine art scene.

It’s difficult to talk about Dan Gilroy’s Velvet Buzzsaw without making some sort of comparison to Ruben Ostlund’s 2017 Palme d’Or winner, The Square. Both films are imbued with surrealism, social commentary and a cast of bizarre characters inhabiting the upper echelons of the fine art world; and both satirise the pomposity of this particular form of high culture, with which most people will only ever have a passing association.

Perhaps it’s the inaccessibility of fine art that makes it such a playground for parody, but satire is only really success if it actually has some critical value. Velvet Buzzsaw is sorely lacking in that.

Where Ostlund has Claes Bang, Dominic West and Elisabeth Moss, Dan Gilroy has a considerably more stacked cast, comprised of key players Jake Gyllenhaal and Rene Russo (who last worked with Gilroy on Nightcrawler), Zawe Ashton, Toni Collette, Daveed Diggs, John Malkovich and Billy Magnussen. Gyllenhaal plays eccentric art critic Morf Vandewalt, a mainstay of the Los Angeles art scene, where he frequently works with gallery owner Rhodora Haze (Russo) and museum curator Gretchen (Collette).

Artists on the scene include Piers (Malkovich) and newcomer Damrish (Diggs), but when Haze’s assistant Josephina (Ashton) comes across a haunting collection of paintings created by a recently-deceased neighbour, her discovery turns their art scene upside down, and sinister events begin to unfold around them.

On the surface, Velvet Buzzsaw has so much going for it, which makes it all the more disappointing that Gilroy’s film never really manages to find its stride. With so many moving parts in the cast alone, it’s difficult for anyone to find breathing room, and most of the characters never transcend the stereotypes on which they are seemingly based – Gyllenhaal’s camp critic, Collette’s insufferable curator, even Malkovich’s austere artist.

The cartoonish violence that comes later wouldn’t pass muster in even the most recent Final Destination sequels (with one scene involving monkeys a notable exception) and flourishes such as the prevalence of vaping, hairless cats, and Airpods feel like nothing more than indicators of contempt for the nouveau-riche.

It’s not enough to just point out the inherent ridiculousness of the racket that is the fine art world, as many would see that as a given already. Gilroy does try to explore the idea of appropriated art and in turn how much one puts of themselves into their work, but it’s all painted with too broad a brush stroke to really pay off. As demonstrated with Nightcrawler and his follow-up Roman J Israel, Esq, Gilroy is at his best when focusing with laser-precision on one fascinating character.

Velvet Buzzsaw feels like a real missed opportunity for Gilroy to bring his acerbic wit to the art world, too polished to pass into B-movie territory but not interesting enough to be truly memorable. Ironically, perhaps he just needed to curate the whole show a little better.

Published 30 Jan 2019

Tags: Dan Gilroy Jake Gyllenhaal Rene Russo Toni Collette


Gyllenhaal reunited with Gilroy sounds like a no-brainer.


A lot going on, but not a lot happening.

In Retrospect.

A rushed and scattershot affair.

Suggested For You


By Adam Woodward

A bug-eyed Jake Gyllenhaal goes full Rupert Pupkin in this eminently creepy satire on the hysteria of rolling TV news.


An Artist’s Eyes

By David Jenkins

This stripped back profile of East London artist Chris Moon is leavened by a bizarre rock photographer cameo appearance.


David Lynch: The Art Life

By Anton Bitel

The cult filmmaker reflects on his remarkable career in this compelling docu-portrait.

review LWLies Recommends

Little White Lies Logo

About Little White Lies

Little White Lies was established in 2005 as a bi-monthly print magazine committed to championing great movies and the talented people who make them. Combining cutting-edge design, illustration and journalism, we’ve been described as being “at the vanguard of the independent publishing movement.” Our reviews feature a unique tripartite ranking system that captures the different aspects of the movie-going experience. We believe in Truth & Movies.