Thirty years on, the defiant desert dweller can teach us how to kick back against dystopia.
AI overlords, environmental deadlock, obscene wealth inequality, and emergent authoritarianism – it all reads like the opening crawl of some cult-classic dystopian flick, but unfortunately for us, it’s just the state of things in 2025. Dystopia looms. How is one to manage? One suggestion: Fight fiction with fiction and cope like a main character.
For inspiration, look no further than the petulant, performative, and perpetually horny protagonist of Rachel Talalay’s Tank Girl (1995). Sure, Tank Girl is raunchy and ridiculous (and that’s what makes it wonderful) but look closer. Beneath the absurdity lies a playbook for protest and defiance that (also unfortunately for us) feels disconcertingly relevant. Although every third country or so seems to be making a hard turn right, there’s still time to course correct – time to push back against the fledgling dystopias.
Get more Little White Lies
And Tank Girl tells us how.
It’s 2033. Eleven years previous, a comet crashed into Earth and destroyed the climate. The resulting drought led to the creation of Water & Power (W&P), a corrupt corporation led by the comically depraved Kesslee, who “control[s] most of the water and got all the power.”
Enter Tank Girl, played by Lori Petty: A water-stealing, tank-obsessed wastelander living it up in the desert until a W&P raid destroys her happy-go-lucky life and launches her into a kink-coded bid for revenge.
Let’s be clear: There are a lot of differences between a bad dom with a poor grasp of kink essentials and an authoritarian régime like W&P (and its non-fictional equivalents)…but there are also quite a few similarities.
In her dalliances with W&P, Tank Girl illustrates an ethos most in the kink community will recognize. Control is achieved consensually, or not at all. It exists only when given, and can be revoked at any time. In this equation, submission is an informed, freely-made choice, and defiance is always an option. For Tank Girl, defiance is just a way of life – she’s a quintessential brat and recognizes power struggles for the poorly disguised game that they are.
These moments of defiance often hinge on Tank Girl’s understanding that her appearance and mannerisms create a set of assumptions about her strength and intelligence. She uses these assumptions as ammunition, transforming them into a weapon rather than a tool of her own subjugation.
During the W&P raid, for instance, Tank Girl unknowingly performs a strip tease for a W&P guard she incorrectly assumed to be her boyfriend. As the barrel of a gun intrudes upon the scene, the dynamic changes: The guard nods for her to continue, and she does, leaning into his (false) assumption that she is a sexual, submissive creature for the taking.
That assumption is his undoing. She knows the role expected of her and plays it well. The illusion of control lasts until the very moment she decides to revoke it – the very moment the guard meets his fate at the end of his own grenades. The strip show turns into a murder scene. Conventional power dynamics turn on their head. And Tank Girl emerges on top.
Whether facing imprisonment in a claustrophobia-inducing torture device aptly named “The Pipe” or shivering after a night spent in a freezer, Tank Girl defies fear. She elects not to give her captors the response they expect. In doing so, she disarms them.
This philosophy is implicit throughout the film, but is at its most overt while Tank Girl is imprisoned in a W&P labor camp. There, she meets Jet Girl (Naomi Watts), a beaten-down prisoner. After Tank Girl saves her from yet an obsessed prison guard who doesn’t know how to take “no” for an answer, Jet Girl explains her ethos for surviving under W&P’s thumb: “The better you behave, the more they leave you alone.”
Yet audiences of 1995, 2025, and 2033 all know this to be patently untrue. In restrictive environments such as these, no one is safe, no matter how meekly they submit to the shackles. Tank Girl knows it too.

She takes Jet Girl on as something of a personal project, spending the entire movie teaching her (and the audience) how to enact through playful protest and determined defiance. Through torture and torment at the hands of W&P, Tank Girl shows us how to play the brat – to laugh through pain and transform conventional power dynamics into a tangled, unintelligible mess.
Every bad euphemism and ‘consequences be damned’ decision is a radical, revolutionary act. It’s a break from convention that disrupts the status quo and gradually destabilizes W&P’s seemingly limitless control. Tank Girl’s acts of defiance confuse and confound; they leave W&P flat-footed.
After all, W&P expects violence and cruelty to inspire fear and to spark a wavering of conviction. In their view, that’s just how it should work. Yet, at no point does Tank Girl consent to this expectation of control. Time and again, she chooses humor and ridicule – she chooses not to submit to the power dynamic placed before her, even in the face of extreme physical violence.
For instance, as part of a tactic to break Tank Girl’s spirit and coerce her into working for him, Kesslee leaves her in a freezer overnight, strapped in a straightjacket and immobilized in the cold. The next morning, he confidently returns, saying: “I’m going to ask you just one more time. Do you want to work for Water and Power?” Looking at her bloodshot eyes and lank hair, he expects immediate acquiescence. Instead, she replies: “Yeah! That sounds groovy. Do I get to wear a cute little outfit like yours?”
Her response cuts through the illusion of power. His uniform – a signal of his authority – is reduced to a fashion choice. His torture tactics are framed as a minor inconvenience. She reduces everything he does to validate his control over the world and its water into a joke and, in doing so, undercuts his authority.
Each display of defiance (and there are many) showcases the fragility of Kesslee and W&P, whose tenuous control hinges on the presumption of power and the individual’s submission to it. Break that compact, and you break the régime. Everyone, Tank Girl tells us, has the ability to choose their own attitude. Even in the direst of circumstances, this freedom remains.
Now extend that choice beyond the individual – when defiance is a collective choice and protest a recurring theme, destabilization is inevitable. Without the willing submission of the masses, no régime (or fictional corporation) can maintain the illusion of totalitarian power.
Conformity and submission, then, are the only things that sustain the dystopias we fear. Sometimes, unconventional existence is protest enough. And boy howdy is Tank Girl good at that. Her behavior may seem frivolous and flippant, but it’s intensely calculated. Together with Jet Girl (and a crew of genetically engineered kangaroo men including one played by Ice T), she overthrows Kesslee and rewrites the power dynamic of post-apocalyptic Earth.
It’s radical social change, achieved one mini-skirt and dick joke at a time, and it’s not entirely unrealistic.
Yes, the daily newsfeed is bleak, each breaking story feels more and more fictional than the last, and in the 30 years since Tank Girl’s release, we’ve veered ever closer toward classic dystopian tropes without a single kangaroo man in sight. But it isn’t an environment we’re resigned to; it’s a landscape we can change. Tank Girl reminds us that we have agency. It tells us that dystopian power depends on willing submission – something no brat worth their salt gives up easily.
As you face up against the morning news, consider taking a leaf from Tank Girl’s book: Love your whips and chains. Live kinky. Make out with a kangaroo man. Be whoever the fuck you want to be. Just don’t lick the boot. That’s the only kink she’ll shame.