Films to last a lifetime – RIP Jean-Luc Godard | Little White Lies

In Praise Of

Films to last a life­time – RIP Jean-Luc Godard

13 Sep 2022

Words by David Jenkins

A man in a suit holding a vintage movie camera on a busy city street.
A man in a suit holding a vintage movie camera on a busy city street.
In mem­o­ry of one of cinema’s most for­mi­da­ble and pathfind­ing tal­ents, who has died at the age of 91.

Every­one assumed that he would go on liv­ing for­ev­er: puff­ing on his giant sto­gies; wear­ing his shades; insou­ciant­ly shap­ing and re-shap­ing the bounds of image cul­ture from his lit­tle hidey-hole in Rolle, Switzer­land. Yet that does not make news of Jean-Luc Godard’s death at the age of 91 any less seismic.

Its impli­ca­tions speak to both the loss of a dyed-in-the-wool inno­va­tor and thinker, as well as the loss of a glob­al fig­ure­head – some­one whose very exis­tence forced the most pathfind­ing young film­mak­ers to try hard­er, work smarter, explore a world beyond convention.

To the very last, he was cre­at­ing new work, teas­ing fes­ti­vals with his pres­ence, and drilling down – often with out­spo­ken vigour – to the dis­qui­et­ing essence of where art, his­to­ry and pol­i­tics col­lide. His daz­zling visu­al polemic The Image Book, from 2018, has become his fea­ture swan­song, and it’s as chal­leng­ing and provoca­tive as any­thing he’s put his name to in the pre­vi­ous sev­en decades of work.

We all remem­ber our first time, and mine was at the Screen at Bel­size Park for a late-’90s re-release of À Bout de Souf­flé. I was young, a dilet­tante, mouthy, knew lit­tle of the film medi­um from a his­tor­i­cal per­spec­tive (a pro­to film bro, per­haps?), so the film’s rad­i­cal mise-en-scène and its mod­ernist retool­ing of pulp genre film­mak­ing was large­ly lost on me. Though I did shine to the sul­try, sexy depic­tion of a romance between a mur­der­ous but charm­ing street tough (Jean-Paul Bel­mon­do) and a pix­ie-bobbed news­pa­per sell­er (Jean Seberg) in a grub­by but resplen­dent Paris ripped straight from a ver­ité newsreel.

And that was enough to lay the bread­crumb trail through an oeu­vre which does not allow for binge­ing or cram­ming. With Godard you there are stages you must pass through to accrue enough knowl­edge to then move onto the next one. As a film­mak­er and artist, he is per­haps the embod­i­ment of some­one refus­ing to rest on cre­ative lau­rels. The for­mal and tonal shifts between phas­es was some­times seen as the imp­ish direc­tor show­ing con­tempt towards his fol­low­ers and acolytes, always refus­ing to give them what they want­ed in the name of fol­low­ing an almost pre­or­dained path that served his idio­syn­crat­ic and often naked­ly per­son­al choice of sub­ject matter.

If that makes Godard sound dif­fi­cult” or obtuse”, then that’s absolute­ly the case. A lot of peo­ple hate a lot of his movies, and that’s absolute­ly fair enough. He is cinema’s James Joyce in many ways, and his films tend to require painstak­ing con­sid­er­a­tion and some­times the help of copi­ous foot­notes in order to see the del­i­cate beau­ty through the mias­ma of form.

Even though both films fall in what’s usu­al­ly coined as his for­ma­tive phase, À Bout de Souf­flé (1959) and Pier­rot le Fou (1965) present an artist who, in just over half a decade, is able to decon­struct the film medi­um to its con­stituent ele­ments, and then rebuild it as a gor­geous and thrilling but dis­tinc­tive and even alien­at­ing cine-struc­ture that forces the view­er to ques­tion their own desires and needs when it comes to how they con­sume art.

Such an arc might seem like the sort of thing that would encom­pass a life’s work for any film­mak­er worth their salt: yet the 70-plus years he spent mak­ing films, Godard would com­plete this same arc maybe four or five times. There is some­thing alchem­i­cal about his cin­e­ma, and Godard him­self is the impa­tient bio­chemist, seen in his stag­ger­ing essay work Histoire(s) du ciné­ma (made dur­ing the late 80s and ear­ly 90s) sat behind a word proces­sor and a video edit­ing machine, cig­ar in mouth, pok­er visor on, mesh­ing togeth­er the work of intel­lec­tu­al heavy­weights through­out his­to­ry with the flighty poet­i­cism of a hummingbird.

Some­times, death can bring with it renew­al, and allow peo­ple to look at an artist’s work with a lit­tle more dis­tance and per­spec­tive. The sense with Godard is that, even when he was alive and pro­duc­ing new work, we bare­ly even scratched the sur­face. He leaves us with a repos­i­to­ry of his vast intel­lect, a body of work so grand, so for­mi­da­ble in terms of its artis­tic mag­ni­tude, that it can and should be seen from space.

For young, curi­ous cinephiles read­ing this piece, per­haps feel­ing as if this would be a giant peak to climb on anoth­er day, start at the begin­ning with À Bout de Souf­flé, and give your­self the oppor­tu­ni­ty to grow and expand in tan­dem with Godard. And if you feel like you need to stop, catch your breath and come back in a few years, a decade even, so be it. These are films that last a lifetime.

You might like