Masters of Suspense: On Park Chan-wook’s love of… | Little White Lies

Sponsored

Mas­ters of Sus­pense: On Park Chan-wook’s love of Alfred Hitchcock

10 Oct 2022

Words by David Jenkins

Two individuals sitting in a dark room, one looking at a screen, the other sitting pensively.
Two individuals sitting in a dark room, one looking at a screen, the other sitting pensively.
Deci­sion to Leave reframes the blue­print of Hitchcock’s Ver­ti­go, but it’s not the first time Park Chan-wook has looked back to this clas­sic-era muse.

Artists tend to face the con­stant scourge of being asked by jour­nal­ists to list their influ­ences. What was your influ­ence behind that scene? Did you ref­er­ence this in the mak­ing of that? What were you watch­ing or read­ing or lis­ten­ing to in the process of cre­at­ing this new piece of art? Some­times, the artist might demure, not want­i­ng to be per­ceived as hav­ing ripped off some­one else. Or worse, being seen as hav­ing pro­duced some­thing that might be deemed infe­ri­or to the work that may have direct­ly inspired it. 

South Kore­an film­mak­er Park Chan-wook has, through the years, been diplo­mat­ic about dis­cussing his own influ­ences, per­haps redo­lent of his trade­mark pre­ci­sion, but also a need to keep the con­ver­sa­tion focused on the text rather than the text behind the text. But one thing has become abun­dant­ly clear with the release of his award-win­ning lat­est fea­ture, Deci­sion to Leave: Park Chan-wook is a big fan of the late British film­mak­er Alfred Hitch­cock. And big fan” may be some­thing of an understatement.

Park has talked open­ly about how Hitchcock’s more-than-sem­i­nal 1958 fea­ture Ver­ti­go became a gate­way film in prompt­ing him to become a direc­tor. And that admis­sion has risen to the fore once more as, from cer­tain oblique angles, Deci­sion to Leave offers a unique riff on Vertigo’s inno­v­a­tive dip­tych struc­ture, as well as its depic­tion of human desire as some­thing that tra­vers­es a broad spec­trum between the vio­lent­ly destruc­tive and the roman­ti­cal­ly transcendent. 

Three smiling men in military uniforms, one wearing a peaked cap, standing in front of portraits on a wall.

As with Ver­ti­go, Deci­sion to Leave is a film whose ellipses and blank spaces – the things it point­ed­ly doesn’t say rather than the things it does – are vital to how it oper­ates. That it revolves around a dizzy­ing­ly com­plex mur­der mys­tery is also more than a coin­ci­dence, as well as the fact that it takes us to a place where the ulti­mate ques­tion of who­dunit? is mere bagatelle when com­pared to the tumul­tuous cen­tral rela­tion­ship between a cop and his suspect.

It’s fun to place these two films side by side, but it’s also ener­gis­ing to see a mod­ern film­mak­er pro­duce an homage to a great film and actu­al­ly retain a detailed under­stand­ing of what it is about the film that makes it great. Deci­sion to Leave is no mere pho­to­copy; it’s tak­ing the pro­found and often ambigu­ous insights of Ver­ti­go, and chan­nelling them into some­thing new. 

Yet look­ing back over his career, it’s only recent­ly that this love of Hitch­cock has seemed so fun­da­men­tal to Park’s cin­e­mat­ic project. He worked as a crit­ic pri­or to his shift into film­mak­ing, and it’s clear from inter­views that his cinephile cre­den­tials have been spot­less, but how far back is this love of Hitch­cock detectable in the films he has made?

If we trav­el back right to the begin­ning, to his debut fea­ture film The Moon Is… The Sun’s Dream from 1992, we might sug­gest there are hints of Hitchcock’s sun­ny Riv­iera caper To Catch a Thief in its blus­tery tale of a gang­ster and his moll run­ning off with a stash of com­pa­ny cash. Yet the tone is all wrong, and the main crossover – a film­mak­er ask­ing us to over­look the moral short­falls of the film’s lead pro­tag­o­nist – doesn’t real­ly con­firm the link. 

Two Asian people, a man and a woman, standing in front of a large red sun-like shape against a dark, cloudy background.

The first time in which Hitch­cock unequiv­o­cal­ly rears his bald pâté with­in the Park’s oeu­vre is in his break­through 2002 film, Joint Secu­ri­ty Area (aka JSA), which is pre­dom­i­nant­ly set in a small shack on the polit­i­cal­ly fraught bor­der of North and South Korea. There is a pro­ce­dur­al ele­ment at the cen­tre of the film, but its minute focus on the actions that occur in a sin­gle space (and are per­haps inspired by the claus­tro­pho­bic con­fines of that space), recalls Hitchcock’s one-take mur­der mys­tery, Rope, from 1948, or even his more polti­cial­ly and his­tor­i­cal­ly trechant sin­gle-set 1944 film, Lifeboat. Both works offer a tem­plate on how to cul­ti­vate a dra­ma in a sin­gle enclosed set­ting and to use the details of both sit­u­a­tion and archi­tec­ture to dri­ve the sto­ry and char­ac­ters, and that is more than evi­dent in how Park spins out the intri­cate plot of JSA.

Glanc­ing over the Hitch­cock back cat­a­logue, and one thing that doesn’t crop up very often is the theme of revenge. It’s per­haps too unre­fined, too messy for Hitch. And as any Park Chan-wook afi­ciona­do worth their salt would know, revenge is a theme that the direc­tor has served up mul­ti­ple times, in var­i­ous dif­fer­ent guis­es and on ever more ornate plat­ters. But look­ing again at 2002’s Old­boy, which still stands as the director’s most icon­ic ear­ly mis­sive, there are fun­da­men­tal ele­ments to the film which con­nect it to anoth­er key Hitich­cock­an pet theme: that of the wrong man”. 

Two Asian women, one in a dark kimono, the other in a green off-the-shoulder dress, sitting together.

If you tamp down the ret­ro­spec­tive knowl­edge we have about the film – that’s it’s an oper­at­ic revenge saga – Old­boy actu­al­ly plays quite clean­ly as a Hich­cock­ian wrong man” movie on sim­i­lar lines to 1959’s North by North­west, in which Cary Grants wise­crack­ing fop sud­den­ly becomes the tar­get of a mur­der­ous cadre of crim­i­nals. In both films, we are watch­ing a char­ac­ter method­i­cal­ly answer the ques­tion of why they have become embroiled in a world of violence.

Things may stray into con­spir­a­cy the­o­ry ter­ri­to­ry were we to match up every Park Chan-wook film with its Hitch­cock equiv­a­lent. Yet it’s worth dash­ing for­ward to Park’s 2016, fairy­tale-like Sarah Wal­ters adap­ta­tion, The Hand­maid­en, in which a clois­tered damsel is impris­oned in a palace-like home­stead, and it’s down to the wiles of anoth­er per­son – dri­ven by roman­tic affec­tion – to lib­er­ate the damsel. Which is almost iden­ti­cal to Hitchcock’s 1946 fea­ture Noto­ri­ous, which many con­nois­seurs (right­ly) con­sid­er to be one of his great­est works and a com­plex fore­run­ner to Vertigo.

And last but not least, it’s worth draw­ing atten­tion to the DNA crossover between Park’s only Eng­lish-lan­guage fea­ture to date, 2013’s Stok­er, to 1943’s Hitch­cock deep cut, Shad­ow of a Doubt. This was like­ly the point at which Park flaunts his affec­tion for Hitch the most direct­ly, as the two films even share a char­ac­ter in the omi­nous, malev­o­lent chis­el­er known as Uncle Char­lie – played by Joseph Cot­ten in 43 and a crafti­ly counter-cast Matthew Goode in 2013.

Maybe what we can take from this is that in future, when needling Park about his influ­ences, we can fast for­ward to the ques­tion of which Hitch­cock film he’s been watch­ing late­ly to acquire a true mea­sure of cin­e­mat­ic prove­nance. Let’s also hope he doesn’t devel­op a kink for Hitchcock’s sav­age­ly vio­lent 1972 film Fren­zy, as we could all be in for an extreme­ly dark time.

Deci­sion to Leave is released in cin­e­mas nation­wide from Octo­ber 21, with pre­views from Octo­ber 15. Book now at mubi​.com/​d​e​c​i​s​i​o​n​t​o​leave

Sym­pa­thy for the Dev­il: The Films of Park Chan-wook’ is now show­ing on MUBI, with new films being added through­out Octo­ber and Novem­ber. For more details head to mubi​.com/​s​p​e​c​i​a​l​s​/​p​a​r​k​-​c​h​a​n​-wook

You might like