The Unknown Girl – first look review | Little White Lies

Festivals

The Unknown Girl – first look review

18 May 2016

Words by David Jenkins

Lying woman in a blue shirt gazing at a male patient lying on a bed
Lying woman in a blue shirt gazing at a male patient lying on a bed
Adèle Haenel turns ama­teur sleuth as the Dar­d­enne broth­ers try their hand at the mur­der-mys­tery genre.

When the Dar­d­enne broth­ers casu­al­ly dropped a career best in 2014 with the tran­scen­dent Two Days, One Night, it offered hope that these film­mak­ers often chid­ed (albeit mild­ly) for their mil­i­tant­ly nar­row focus could still make the tried and test­ed for­mu­la bear glo­ri­ous riches.

With their lat­est, The Unknown Girl, we can see that even the tini­est devi­a­tion from their cin­e­mat­ic com­fort zone can add a note of pot luck sur­prise. Their films have often been laced with ref­er­ences to clas­si­cal genre – west­erns, thrillers, noir – but this one is an out-and-out mur­der mys­tery, pos­si­bly the first time that plot machi­na­tions have car­ried as much, if not more weight than the task of prob­ing their char­ac­ters inner and out­er lives.

Adèle Haenel shov­els on the grit in the role of Dr Jen­ny Davin, a metic­u­lous, cool-head­ed GP who is forced to ques­tion the nature of her career and her own sense of pro­fes­sion­al com­pas­sion when a woman is mur­dered close to her surgery. What’s more, this woman buzzes on the door pri­or to the inci­dent, and what with it being after hours, Jen­ny makes the call not to answer it. And so in search for spir­i­tu­al grace, she turns ama­teur sleuth.

Yet, it’s ques­tion­able just how com­mit­ted the Dar­d­ennes are to the who­dunit aspect of the sto­ry, their core inter­est appear­ing to reside more with ques­tions of why Jen­ny has to see this minia­ture odyssey through. Does she real­ly want to put a name to the face of this dead girl, or is she dri­ven by the self­ish desire to clear her own con­scious? It’s a melan­cholic film in that it offers con­fir­ma­tion that the breadth of our abil­i­ty to help those in need has its lim­its, and those lim­its are, in the grand scheme of things, extreme­ly mod­est. It also shows that we may nat­u­ral­ly under­val­ue the med­ical pro­fes­sion, as doc­tors must be empa­thet­ic by design and so instincts that exist out­side of that occu­pa­tion­al purview can slip by unno­ticed. Can a per­son real­ly be good who is paid to be good or has active­ly cho­sen to be good? And what does good” even mean?

Haenel’s per­for­mance is so scrupu­lous that she occa­sion­al­ly imbues Jen­ny with the per­fume of Hitch­cock­ian mania. Ver­ti­go and Rear Win­dow feel like touch­stones, the idea of unblink­ing obses­sion in the for­mer, and the sense of utter help­less­ness in the lat­ter. Jen­ny nev­er smiles and lives a spar­tan life. She appears to have no friends or fam­i­ly, only one set of clothes, and a coat which resem­bles a giant door­mat. She is always tol­er­ant and under­stand­ing, even though she sel­dom smiles. If any­thing, the Dar­d­ennes push her saint­li­ness a lit­tle too far, observ­ing her guilt in a social vac­u­um which has no real dra­mat­ic outlet.

Where this doesn’t quite reach the dizzy heights of top-tier Dar­d­ennes movies is in its hokey genre plot­ting. The sto­ry is pow­ered by a string of hap­py coin­ci­dences, with peo­ple bump­ing into one anoth­er or mere­ly spot­ting them in the street. The quest for the unknown girl’s iden­ti­ty is tough because the world is so big, and the themes cov­ered by the film are equal­ly expan­sive. But the sto­ry itself is too inti­mate, cleav­ing close­ly to a small ensem­ble of side-play­ers and find­ing res­o­lu­tion too quick­ly and com­fort­ably. And yet, this still has rich­ness and depth in abun­dance, prov­ing that even when the broth­ers’ are slight­ly off their game, they’re still supe­ri­or to most out there.

You might like