When CGI went bad: revisiting the original Power… | Little White Lies

When CGI went bad: revis­it­ing the orig­i­nal Pow­er Rangers movie

23 Mar 2017

Words by David Jenkins

Group of colourful costumed characters striking heroic poses in a theatrical setting.
Group of colourful costumed characters striking heroic poses in a theatrical setting.
The spe­cial effects in this 1995 fol­ly have to be seen to be believed.

We some­times take for grant­ed how far main­stream movies have come over the last 20 or so years. The half-life of CG tech­nol­o­gy is now so swift that watch­ing a film made just a sin­gle cal­en­dar year pri­or is like see­ing some laugh­able, fusty rel­ic of a bygone era. Old main­stream movies are the brick-sized car­phones, the tube tele­vi­sion-VCR com­bos, or the home perm kits – the objects we’d now only expect to see scat­tered across gap­ing landfills.

A thirst for new, orig­i­nal cin­e­mat­ic spec­ta­cle has super­seded a desire to con­tem­plate the vast offer­ings avail­able in the present, or even those from the very recent past. Call it the speed of cin­e­ma if you like – the rate at which images don’t just fade from our col­lec­tive con­scious, but die an embar­rass­ing, pub­lic death. See­ing these movies on cin­e­ma screens is like see­ing a mod­el with­out make-up. All of which brings us to those high-kick­ing teen tear­aways, the Pow­er Rangers.

In case you’ve been liv­ing under a pur­ple sty­ro­foam rock for the past six months, you’ll know that a new, reboot­ed Pow­er Rangers movie has thud­ded from the Hol­ly­wood pro­duc­tion line. In antic­i­pa­tion of this glossy, fam­i­ly-friend­ly fight em up, we went back to the cin­e­mat­ic source mate­r­i­al: 1995’s Mighty Mor­phin Pow­er Rangers: The Movie from direc­tor Bri­an Spicer. The expe­ri­ence was breath­tak­ing, in a good and a bad way. It now looks as if the film has arrived in a sealed cap­sule, sent from an unchart­ed solar sys­tem. It throws up some con­found­ing pre-Y2K ques­tions like, how did peo­ple reheat soup before microwaves, and, how did peo­ple make movies before com­put­ers could essen­tial­ly do the job for them?

It’s pos­si­ble to see Spicer’s mul­ti­coloured dream opus as a tran­si­tion­al film. It almost sig­nals the point where organ­ic visu­al effects were no longer cut­ting the mus­tard, and the need for the grand­ness of scale ush­ered in by dig­i­tal effects was to become the new norm. Angel Grove’s dead-eyed finest are charged with defeat­ing an ancient enti­ty called Ivan Ooze who, for some rea­son, has devel­oped the pun-heavy pat­ter of a day­time tele­vi­sion quiz host. His arrival on Earth is sig­nalled by the dis­cov­ery of a giant egg on a build­ing site which, once cracked, seeps out an oleagi­nous gel which trans­forms nor­mal work­ing folks into zom­bie-like drones.

What’s fas­ci­nat­ing is that the Pow­er Rangers them­selves are a vac­u­um of human­i­ty. They don’t have per­son­al inter­ac­tions or any lives out­side of their plan­et-pro­tect­ing day jobs. It’s like their souls have been extract­ed from their ripped bod­ies and blast­ed into the sun. It’s strange because, with such an obvi­ous dearth of resource, you’d half expect there to be more idle chat­ter to fill in the gaps. Even icon­ic klutz two­some Bulk and Skull are cast aside from the action after an ear­ly sketch in which they com­i­cal­ly muff up a skydive.

For the first half of the film, every­thing is tan­gi­ble. All props are phys­i­cal objects, and the antag­o­nist min­ions are decked out in real cos­tumes rather than being scanned and repli­cat­ed with the help of a com­put­er. As crum­my as some of the ene­my fight­ers look – often as if they’ve escaped from the grounds of a fail­ing ex-Sovi­et theme park – there’s some­thing heart­en­ing about the idea that some­one was charged with hack­ing at some ply­wood for an after­noon and it would even­tu­al­ly end up in a movie. A movie that made over $60m at the box office.

The orig­i­nal Pow­er Rangers in no way ascribes to any con­ven­tion­al def­i­n­i­tion of the term good”, appear­ing as if it mere­ly crush­es togeth­er three or four of the bet­ter TV episodes and recy­cles all the clas­sic catch­phras­es and music cues. But there is some­thing about it that tran­scends sim­ple bina­ry read­ings of qual­i­ty. The fact that you can see it was a film made by fal­li­ble humans who were mas­sive­ly lim­it­ed in what they could achieve give it an almost heart­break­ing edge. The fol­ly has evolved into whimsy.

And then to the film’s pièce de résis­tance: a cli­mac­tic show­down in ani­mal-inspired robot mechs which allows for some very, very ear­ly com­put­er graph­ics to be splat­ted onto the screen. A moment in which Ivan Ooze trans­ports from the top of a towerblock and into the body of his own giant mon­ster appears as if ani­ma­tors are push­ing restrict­ed tech­nol­o­gy to its very out­er limits.

A sat­u­ra­tion of slick com­put­er effects that can lit­er­al­ly fool the eye – such as in Gareth Edwards’ Rogue One: A Star Wars Sto­ry and its digi-res­ur­rec­tion of a long-dead actor – leads audi­ences to for­get the hum­ble roots of this cre­ative form. But the effects in the final reel of Mighty Mor­phin Pow­er Rangers: The Movie have to be seen to be believed. Words lack the essen­tial capac­i­ty to describe them. The pas­sage of time has made the film feel like an avant garde work that almost acts as a com­men­tary on the mod­ern block­buster. Maybe we’ll be say­ing the same about Kong: Skull Island in 2037?

You might like