Carol Morley: “I could tell straight away that… | Little White Lies

Interviews

Car­ol Mor­ley: I could tell straight away that Audrey Amiss was a com­plete­ly fas­ci­nat­ing person”

27 Oct 2023

Words by David Jenkins

Stylised portrait of a blonde woman with glasses, surrounded by colourful graphics and text.
Stylised portrait of a blonde woman with glasses, surrounded by colourful graphics and text.
The intre­pid British direc­tor on being one of the first peo­ple to lay their eyes on the archives of the late artist Audrey Amiss – sub­ject of Typ­ist, Artist, Pirate, King.

Con­vic­tion is some­thing the British writer/​director Car­ol Mor­ley pos­sess­es in abun­dance – cer­tain­ly on the evi­dence of her wild fil­mog­ra­phy. Deter­mined to use film to redis­cov­er or revis­it lost places, or to cre­ate a sort of cine-shrine to those she feels have fall­en through the cracks, hers is an excit­ing­ly idio­syn­crat­ic oeu­vre. From laud­ed, con­fes­sion­al debut The Alco­hol Years, to the haunt­ing Dreams of a Life and The Falling, and the plain barmy mys­tic polici­er, Out of Blue, she returns with one of her finest films, pos­si­bly a qua­si-auto­bi­og­ra­phy which explores the lat­ter years of the lit­tle-known north­ern artist, Audrey Amiss.

LWLies: How did you thread the nee­dle between get­ting this screen­writ­ing bur­sary from the Well­come Col­lec­tion to dis­cov­er­ing Audrey Amiss? 

Mor­ley: I got the Well­come screen­writ­ing fel­low­ship. First year it was Jonathan Glaz­er. Then it was Clio Barnard. It was a very open thing. They were encour­ag­ing peo­ple to go in and you didn’t have to have a result. You got mon­ey and you got time and you got access to peo­ple affil­i­at­ed with Well­come as well as the peo­ple at Well­come. In the ini­tial stages, they set up meet­ings with a few peo­ple who were in my area of interest.

And how did you describe that interest? 

Well, I met a psy­chi­a­trist who is based in Cam­bridge, Paul Fletch­er, who spe­cialis­es in Huntington’s Dis­ease but also what the mind is. I found it all very inter­est­ing. He’s actu­al­ly a con­sul­tant on the film. At that point, all I knew when I went into Well­come was that I want­ed to look at stuff. I was attend­ing gov­ern­ment things on facial recog­ni­tion and DNA and all that stuff. Prob­a­bly at some point in my film­mak­ing life, that will all emerge.

You feel you got mate­r­i­al enough for mul­ti­ple films? 

So much. Very lit­tle is known about the mind. Less that the uni­verse in fact. It’s real­ly that whole idea of who we are and what we are. At the time, Well­come said they were about bio­med­ical sci­ence, which I didn’t know what that was. But now they say health and every­thing that affects that. Any­way, what I real­ly want­ed was a first-per­son account of an expe­ri­ence with­in their archive. There was some­one there at the time called Gillian Scoth­ern, who’s now at the BFI, and she was some­one who would link film and TV mak­ers with what Well­come housed. It’s such a vast organ­i­sa­tion, with archive and so much. At one point she was just fir­ing pitch­es at me, and it was over­whelm­ing. And then sud­den­ly, she said, They have an archive here of a per­son who col­lect­ed the wrap­pers of every­thing she ate every day,’ and I was like, Hold on…’. She didn’t know her name, so she went to find out. Then, I went into the library and asked them, and they said it was Audrey Amiss. And I just said I would love to look at the scrap book with wrappers.

What did the archive look like when they first brought it to you? 

At that point, all the mate­ri­als were uncat­a­logued. It was all housed in deep stor­age in Cheshire. They bought two box­es of stuff and gave me two hours in a room. I was there all day. In the scrap­book, Audrey had anno­tat­ed the wrap­pers with details of her life and what had hap­pened that day.

Two women in colourful patterned jackets and scarves, standing together near a building.

How quick­ly did you get a sense that her work was actu­al­ly biographical? 

Straight away. I knew I want­ed to look at more. And I could tell she was com­plete­ly fas­ci­nat­ing as a per­son. So they brought me more stuff. I began to get very acquaint­ed with her and the mate­r­i­al. And at that point I said I’d like to meet the sur­viv­ing mem­bers of her fam­i­ly. I met her nephew and niece in King’s Cross. Those moments are so incred­i­ble, as you feel you’re get­ting clos­er to the per­son. And they were like, You prob­a­bly know more about Audrey than we do,’ because I’d read so much from a first-per­son account and looked at her paint­ings and pictures.

How did the Well­come come to Audrey’s archive? 

Her niece and nephew inher­it­ed Audrey’s flat in Clapham where she lived for 30 years. When they arrived to take a look, they dis­cov­ered the 50,000 sketch­es, the diaries, the paint­ings, every­thing. They had no idea how much she’d accu­mu­lat­ed or even what she did.

It’s crazy to think that if the wrong per­son had entered that flat, it could’ve all end­ed up in landfill. 

That might have hap­pened even with them who cared. They real­ly didn’t know what to do with all this stuff. At one point it was in a shed. They thought they’d have to throw it away. But then Kate, her niece, was at the school gates pick­ing up her kids, and she men­tioned to anoth­er par­ent about her aunt. And the per­son she was talk­ing to worked at Well­come. Not in any depart­ment that could take on the mate­r­i­al, but she said she’d have a word with a col­league. An archivist went to sur­vey the work to see if it was deemed impor­tant enough to take on. When I saw it in 2015, 2016, every­thing was in box­es and jum­bled up. I remem­ber one box was just every­thing tak­en off of Audrey’s cof­fee table. Her old pass­port was in there, and where you were sup­posed to put occu­pa­tion, she had writ­ten Typ­ist Artist Pirate King’. As soon as I saw it, I knew that was going to be the title.

Was there any video or film footage of her? 

Not real­ly. Even­tu­al­ly, I got hold of a reel of Super 8 from her sis­ter which was the wed­ding of her broth­er-in-law, John, and there was Audrey on the edge in a dress and a hat. It would have been about eight months after her first break­down, when she was diag­nosed with para­noid schizophrenia.

Middle-aged woman with brown hair smiling and holding a strip of photos.

What about audio?

No audio. But Audrey had left so much of her per­son­al­i­ty behind in her scrap­books and diaries. When her fam­i­ly saw the film, they said it’s uncan­ny how much Mon­i­ca Dolan sounds like Audrey con­sid­er­ing she’d nev­er heard her.

Do you think that maybe this was free­ing for Mon­i­ca? It allowed her to build more of a char­ac­ter than she oth­er­wise would have.

A bit like Joyce Vin­cent from Dreams of a Life, we’ll nev­er know who they real­ly were. It is an inter­pre­ta­tion. But Audrey left so much behind. She was some­one peo­ple would lit­er­al­ly cross the road to avoid – her neigh­bours told me that. But she was also eru­dite, poet­ic and had a vast knowl­edge of things going on in the world. I want­ed to cap­ture that, as well as the per­son you would cross the road to avoid.

It’s refresh­ing to see a film about an artist which doesn’t fol­low the arche­typ­al nar­ra­tive arc.

That took time. I wrote a draft and my agent went, Car­ol, that’s unfi­nance­able.’ And that wasn’t because Audrey was unknown, it was because of the script. The first draft was where it entire­ly took place inside her flat and the walls would move and you would enter the stu­dio, and there would be these re-enact­ments. This was an idea where Audrey was very aware she was part of a film. That was the unfi­nance­able one. The sec­ond one was more about the process that I’d gone through, but also of the archivists that I was meet­ing. It was par­al­lel sto­ries, where on one side you have an archivist putting togeth­er Audrey’s life, and then Audrey liv­ing her life but being aware there’s some­thing going on. No one felt we could take that one the whole way, but for me, both treat­ments were ways to accom­mo­date Audrey’s mind and the way she saw the world.

When did you jump on this idea of Audrey’s love of travel?

I met a woman named Joyce, the wife of her broth­er-in-law John. She was 90 and has died since. She was like, err art were bloody awful!’ – from Red­car like. She said, We ad the Mor­ris Minor and we’d go to the Lake Dis­trict togeth­er and Audrey would make me climb all these hills in this old car.’ I start­ed to envis­age this excite­ment she had for explor­ing the world, because she did go to Chi­na and South Amer­i­ca. She was very intre­pid. I began to exam­ine the notion of return and thought it would be inter­est­ing to con­struct some­thing around a know­able genre, as well as mess­ing with that genre.

The oth­er key role in the film is Kel­ly Mac­don­ald as Audrey’s psy­chi­atric nurse, San­dra. How did she fac­tor in? 

Audrey wrote a lot about her psy­chi­atric nurse. Over time, she had dif­fer­ent ones. Because I’d met the peo­ple around Audrey, I thought it was impor­tant to have that bat­tle that she had and that they had with her. Nurs­es, psy­chi­a­trists, psy­chol­o­gists, have such a dif­fi­cult time, because they’re often despised by the men­tal health user. But they also get very lit­tle fund­ing and sup­port. So I want­ed to make this a por­trait of Audrey, but con­nect­ed to the per­son who sup­port­ed her.

Typ­ist, Artist, Pirate, King opens in cin­e­mas on 27 October

You might like

Accessibility Settings

Text

Applies the Open Dyslexic font, designed to improve readability for individuals with dyslexia.

Applies a more readable font throughout the website, improving readability.

Underlines links throughout the website, making them easier to distinguish.

Adjusts the font size for improved readability.

Visuals

Reduces animations and disables autoplaying videos across the website, reducing distractions and improving focus.

Reduces the colour saturation throughout the website to create a more soothing visual experience.

Increases the contrast of elements on the website, making text and interface elements easier to distinguish.