‘For some people, simulation theory is not a… | Little White Lies

Festivals

For some peo­ple, sim­u­la­tion the­o­ry is not a joke’ – Rod­ney Asch­er on A Glitch in the Matrix

01 Feb 2021

Words by Isaac Feldberg

A man with a beard, eyes closed, framed by translucent, flowing material.
A man with a beard, eyes closed, framed by translucent, flowing material.
The doc­u­men­tary mak­er on the deep exis­ten­tial con­cerns at the heart of his lat­est project.

Rod­ney Asch­er makes haunt­ed house movies inside the human mind. Play­ful and unset­tling, his hor­ror doc­u­men­taries fil­ter sub­jec­tive expe­ri­ence through pop-cul­ture psy­chol­o­gy, study­ing the art we con­sume and how it con­sumes us.

In Room 237, Asch­er spoke to obses­sive fans of Stan­ley Kubrick’s The Shin­ing, chart­ing the gulfs that can open up between artis­tic intent and indi­vid­ual inter­pre­ta­tion. The Night­mare exam­ined sleep paral­y­sis, restag­ing eight par­tic­i­pants’ dark­est dreams and doc­u­ment­ing their search for answers through cin­e­ma, faith, and sociology.

The LA-based filmmaker’s lat­est, A Glitch in the Matrix, which pre­miered at this year’s vir­tu­al Sun­dance Film Fes­ti­val and hits dig­i­tal plat­forms on 5 Feb­ru­ary, plunges us into an exis­ten­tial rab­bit hole of sim­u­la­tion the­o­ry’. It ques­tions whether we’re liv­ing inside some­one else’s com­put­er – by intro­duc­ing a group of experts and so-called eye­wit­ness­es” con­vinced we are.

When­ev­er some­thing crazy hap­pens in the world – and cra­zier things appear to be hap­pen­ing at an ever-increas­ing rate – some­one on Twit­ter is mak­ing the joke that the sim­u­la­tion is bug­gy,” says Asch­er. It’s becom­ing a short­hand to explain a com­mon feel­ing. But if a hun­dred peo­ple are mak­ing jokes about it, a thou­sand peo­ple are think­ing about it and not say­ing it out loud. For some of them, it’s not a joke.”

The film traces sim­u­la­tion theory’s exis­ten­tial con­cerns back to Plato’s cave and Descartes’ evil demon hypoth­e­sis, though it cred­its the Wachowskis’ Matrix tril­o­gy, lit­er­ary giant Philip K Dick, and Oxford phi­los­o­phy pro­fes­sor Nick Bostrom (who wrote the 2001 arti­cle Are You Liv­ing in a Com­put­er Sim­u­la­tion?’), as well as oth­er pub­lic fig­ures, with pop­u­lar­is­ing such notions in mod­ern times.

When Elon Musk talked about sim­u­la­tion the­o­ry dur­ing a press con­fer­ence,” adds Asch­er, that idea seemed to catch on in a way that was far beyond the train of peo­ple who spend too much time watch­ing sci­ence fic­tion movies or on the inter­net.’ One of the most suc­cess­ful peo­ple on the globe believed in it, or at least took it seriously.”

But Ascher’s film – com­pris­ing dig­i­tal reen­act­ments, footage from 90s sci-fi movies and video games, and Skype inter­views – spends less time with thought lead­ers than it does every­day peo­ple who sus­pect real­i­ty is less than real. Among the accounts: a pastor’s son, altered by a cri­sis of faith; a Har­vard-edu­cat­ed engi­neer, con­vinced the num­bers back up sim­u­la­tion the­o­ry after a string of unex­plain­able events; and a New York­er, track­ing syn­chronic­i­ties in his life, who utilis­es a sen­so­ry-depri­va­tion tank.

To offer such sub­jects anonymi­ty, 3D avatars are imposed over faces and upper bod­ies. Despite this arti­fice, Asch­er approach­es inter­vie­wees com­pas­sion­ate­ly. These projects are about let­ting an audi­ence look at the world through anoth­er person’s eyes,” he says. I remem­ber sit­ting on my parent’s car­pet in a sun­beam, look­ing at dust motes, strug­gling to under­stand some ele­ment of the world. I find those moments infi­nite­ly relatable.”

The film’s scari­est sto­ry fol­lows Joshua Cooke, who speaks from prison about the night his obses­sion with The Matrix crossed a hor­ri­fy­ing line. His tes­ti­mo­ny is accom­pa­nied by a haunt­ing walk­through of his house and base­ment that Asch­er height­ens using ani­mat­ed pho­togram­me­try. I’d be lying if I said I wasn’t solic­it­ing sto­ries that I hoped would have a cer­tain effect,” says Asch­er, who first approached Cooke after learn­ing his lawyers had con­sid­ered attempt­ing the Matrix defence’ at tri­al, argu­ing he hadn’t known what was real at the time of his crimes. I tried to be as true to his sto­ry, and to my reac­tion to hear­ing it, as possible.”

Might the Matrix defence have worked? Ascher’s films chal­lenge audi­ences not to dis­count the ways art shapes our psy­cholo­gies. Pre­vi­ous gen­er­a­tions that mem­o­rised the Bible would be able to com­pare their prob­lems to Job’s,” he notes. Now, [pop cul­ture] is the lan­guage we all speak fluently.”

Ascher’s direc­to­r­i­al choic­es dic­tate all his audi­ence sees. Mak­ing movies that inter­ro­gate per­cep­tion, the irony of that respon­si­bil­i­ty isn’t lost on him. He accounts for it by demol­ish­ing the wall between direc­tor and sub­ject, appear­ing on cam­era and employ­ing con­spic­u­ous edits to remind view­ers they’re watch­ing a movie. Shoot­ing a lit­tle off the edge of the sets, reveal­ing the arti­fice of the recre­ations, is impor­tant to me,” explains Asch­er. I want to show my hand, to show that there’s a man behind the curtain.”

By deal­ing in psy­cho­log­i­cal phe­nom­e­na, Asch­er steers away from objec­tive truths. And in the case of A Glitch in the Matrix, that’s like­ly wise. Giv­en that any evi­dence gath­ered in pur­suit of sim­u­la­tion the­o­ry could itself be sim­u­lat­ed, does he con­sid­er it pos­si­ble to prove either way? It’s an unan­swer­able ques­tion. But all these projects are much more about the ques­tions than they are about the answers. Room 237, for me, is ask­ing the ques­tion, Who decides what a piece of art means? The artist, the audi­ences, crit­ics, aca­d­e­mics?’ And sleep paral­y­sis in The Night­mare is ask­ing the ques­tion of, These things peo­ple see, these twi­light expe­ri­ences: do they come from inside, or do they come from outside?’”

A Glitch in the Matrix, mean­while, cap­tures peo­ple earnest­ly strug­gling with real­i­ty and their roles with­in it, sim­u­lat­ed or not. The ques­tion of Are we all liv­ing in the [same] world, or are we all liv­ing in indi­vid­ual worlds?’ might be one this film is pok­ing up against,” says Asch­er. Is there a way for us to find a con­sen­sus reality?”

You might like

Accessibility Settings

Text

Applies the Open Dyslexic font, designed to improve readability for individuals with dyslexia.

Applies a more readable font throughout the website, improving readability.

Underlines links throughout the website, making them easier to distinguish.

Adjusts the font size for improved readability.

Visuals

Reduces animations and disables autoplaying videos across the website, reducing distractions and improving focus.

Reduces the colour saturation throughout the website to create a more soothing visual experience.

Increases the contrast of elements on the website, making text and interface elements easier to distinguish.