In the Shadow of Women – first look review | Little White Lies

Festivals

In the Shad­ow of Women – first look review

14 May 2015

Words by David Jenkins

Two people, a man and a woman, in a serious conversation in front of a wire fence in a black and white image.
Two people, a man and a woman, in a serious conversation in front of a wire fence in a black and white image.
The 2015 Cannes Director’s Fort­night strand opens with a mag­nif­i­cent minia­ture from Philippe Garrel.

There’s a shot in Philippe Garrel’s casu­al­ly scin­til­lat­ing In The Shad­ow of Women (which opened the 2015 Director’s Fort­night strand at Cannes), in which a male and female char­ac­ter – played by Mounir Mar­goum and Clotilde Courau respec­tive­ly – meet in a Parisian café by way of an extra-mar­i­tal tryst. She strolls in pur­pose­ful­ly, he stands up from the table, clos­ing his notepad, wraps his arms around her, and smiles.

Cut­ting straight through what some might denote as Garrel’s iron­ic mis­an­thropy, this stir­ring take cap­tures with remark­able inten­si­ty and clar­i­ty the joy of bod­ies wrapped up in one anoth­er, the gid­dy antic­i­pa­tion of an illic­it sex­u­al rela­tion, and, more than any­thing, an unabashed­ly expressed feel­ing of warmth and appre­ci­a­tion. Maybe it’s not quite love, but it’ll do till love gets there. Margoum’s close-eyed smile, reveal­ing an almost pained sen­sa­tion of hap­pi­ness, states more about this minor character’s cur­rent state, where he’s come from and where he’s going, than all the reams of cod expo­si­tion­al dia­logue you could throw at him. Such off-hand empa­thy is what makes Gar­rel one of the greats.

Pos­si­bly the tounge-in-cheek yin to the Jealousy’s dis­creet­ly anguished yang, In The Shad­ow of Women is per­haps one of Garrel’s most amus­ing films, even though it sel­dom direct­ly shoots for laughs. Gar­rel Jr (Louis) intones a wry ana­lyt­i­cal nar­ra­tion which offers a psy­cho­log­i­cal com­men­tary on the char­ac­ters’ often vague­ly-defined deci­sions, the con­tent of which is fun­ny large­ly down to its utter earnestness.

The film looks at mod­ern infi­deli­ty, ini­tial­ly cat­e­goris­ing it as scourge, then as equi­lib­ri­um, and final­ly as revi­tal­is­ing roman­tic force. As glib as that might sound, it’s played out in what ini­tial­ly appears to be ultra-func­tion­al A‑to‑B sequences, but even­tu­al­ly boasts an unadorned nar­ra­tive, aes­thet­ic and emo­tion­al puri­ty that harks back to late Bres­son. This clas­si­cal, mil­i­tant­ly un-deco­rous form of film­mak­ing charges tiny adorn­ments with max­i­mum impact, such as numer­ous shots of a microwave oven (you’ll know when you see it). In the few moments when char­ac­ters inter­act with mod­ern tech­nol­o­gy, it’s just odd, and it’s because their hair-trig­ger emo­tion­al hon­esty seems sprung from anoth­er era. Oth­er touch­stones when it comes to form and con­tent include Manoel de Oliveira and Hong Sang-soo.

Garrel’s on-screen avatar, Pierre, is played by Stanis­las Mer­har, a dishev­elled and surly doc­u­men­tary film­mak­er who is assist­ed in all tiers of pro­duc­tion by his dot­ing and buoy­ant wife, Manon (Courau). Dri­ven by what he feels are innate­ly man­ly urges which come hard­wired into his (and his kind’s) DNA, Pierre starts sleep­ing with a woman he meets in a 35mm print archive. (On a side note, she’s shown clear­ing film cans out of what looks like a shed and dump­ing them into the back of a van, treat­ing them with the kind of rev­er­ence that one might a blown-out tube television).

This sce­nario plays out with var­i­ous twists along the way and Gar­rel toys with our affec­tions for the char­ac­ters with­out ever mak­ing his pres­ence felt, expert­ly tem­per­ing and recon­tex­tu­al­is­ing Pierre’s barefaced shit­bag­gery and nev­er pass­ing a moral judge­ment on his actions. Equal­ly, Manon isn’t the paragon of shin­ing virtue who stands in as a sim­ple coun­ter­point to her husband’s jad­ed dal­liances; she too is com­plex and strong and dri­ven by mys­te­ri­ous impuls­es which exist beyond the purview of being a maid to her man.

Maybe some might see the film as lack­ing in new insights on its sub­ject mat­ter or the plot too prim­i­tive to hit home as dra­ma. But its bril­liance derives most­ly from its naked con­fes­sion­al can­dour, that this is Gar­rel him­self, com­fort­able, and talk­ing open­ly about desires which most peo­ple would rather sup­press or maybe don’t even under­stand. By its clos­ing scenes, there’s the sug­ges­tion that the film is a pos­tu­la­tion on what it would mean if peo­ple start­ed only telling the truth to one anoth­er. It set­tles on say­ing that there’s no right way when it comes to love.

You might like