Image Book – first look review | Little White Lies

Festivals

Image Book – first look review

12 May 2018

Words by David Jenkins

Raised hand silhouette against black background.
Raised hand silhouette against black background.
Obscure doesn’t even begin to cov­er the intractable delights of the lat­est cine-sor­tie from Jean-Luc Godard.

Aban­don hope all ye who enter here. And log­ic, too. And any accept­ed wis­dom which might tell you that cin­e­ma is pri­mar­i­ly an enter­tain­ment medi­um (even though this is very enter­tain­ing in its own mis­chie­vous way). Image Book is the lat­est arcane and abstract work from Jean-Luc Godard – a direc­tor who chal­lenged the cosy pre­cepts of nar­ra­tive cin­e­ma back in the 60s and, on this evi­dence, is still doing it today.

Famil­iar­i­ty with the director’s gigan­tic, late-’80s video col­lage Histoire(s) du ciné­ma might act as a step­ping stone towards this baf­fling new work, as it offers a sim­i­lar onslaught of cap­tured frag­ments, manip­u­lat­ed news­reel footage, slo­gan-like inter-titles and much doomy neo-clas­si­cal music culled from the ECM catalogue.

Godard him­self pro­vides much of the nar­ra­tion, his voice so grav­el­ly it now makes Tom Waits sound like a Eng­lish choir­boy. The film casts a spell, and the dia­logue that we hear comes across as a sple­net­ic incan­ta­tion while the direc­tor stirs his caul­dron in the base­ment. Those not flu­ent in French will have to con­tend with the fact that only about half of the nar­ra­tion is sub­ti­tled – usu­al­ly the open­ing clause of a sen­tence is miss­ing, and then the remain­der is com­pact­ed into some­thing sim­pler. Yet, even if all the dia­logue were trans­lat­ed, it’s hard to believe that the film would sud­den­ly become a paragon of the­mat­ic clarity.

The idea, then, is that you sit back and allow the film to wash over you. Or steam­roller over you is prob­a­bly the bet­ter allu­sion. Godard’s ref­er­ence points are scraped from the pok­i­est cor­ners of phi­los­o­phy, art and lit­er­a­ture, and the job of deci­pher­ing the point he’s ulti­mate­ly dri­ving towards will be com­plet­ed not after a sin­gle screen­ing at a busy Euro­pean film fes­ti­val, but after much hard intel­lec­tu­al graft, mul­ti­ple rewatch­es and pos­si­bly a pause but­ton. It’s a per­cep­tion-warp­ing work which appears more inter­est­ed in for­mal manip­u­la­tion than deliv­er­ing a tidy polemic (although, the film does broad­ly look at the fraught polit­i­cal rela­tion­ships between the west and the east).

It’s a vio­lent film, both lit­er­al­ly and fig­u­ra­tive­ly. Godard casu­al­ly jux­ta­pos­es fic­tion and real­i­ty by skirt­ing between clas­sic movie clips and ama­teur doc­u­men­tary footage, all of which looks like it’s been bathed in acid. One haunt­ing moment sees a group of men, hood­ed and shack­led, being tossed off a boat into the sea. It looks like this sequence comes from the silent era and has been staged for a nar­ra­tive fea­ture. Then, we cut to grainy cam­corder footage of the exact same set up, this time with a crum­by dig­i­tal water­mark in on cor­ner of the frame.

What makes the film so inter­est­ing is that Godard lays nuggets of visu­al beau­ty among the detri­tus. For exam­ple, there’s one image which has been digi­tised, manip­u­lat­ed and colour-sat­u­rat­ed so it looks like one of those Mag­ic Eye puz­zles where you have to real­ly stare at the screen for the base image to even­tu­al­ly become clear. Maybe the film is a cri­tique less of film as an art form or a polit­i­cal tool, but of the tech­nol­o­gy that enables film and a sug­ges­tion that the puri­ty of cel­lu­loid, a bulb and a screen is now a dis­tant memory.

Most clips ini­tial­ly appear in mul­ti­ple aspect ratios, as if a smart TV is squash­ing or expand­ing the image as it sees fit. Image Book does much to cul­ti­vate the Godard faith­ful while flip­ping mul­ti­ple V‑signs towards the notion of art as an inclu­sive medi­um. All told, it’s a pret­ty great movie.

You might like