Why I love Katharine Hepburn’s performance in… | Little White Lies

In Praise Of

Why I love Katharine Hepburn’s per­for­mance in Summertime

01 Aug 2021

Words by Gabriela Almeida

A woman sitting at a table in a busy restaurant, smiling and holding a glass of wine. The restaurant appears to be bustling with other diners in the background.
A woman sitting at a table in a busy restaurant, smiling and holding a glass of wine. The restaurant appears to be bustling with other diners in the background.
In David Lean’s dreamy 1955 romance, the Hol­ly­wood icon sub­tly plays with her usu­al screen persona.

To be in Hol­ly­wood and uncom­pro­mis­ing was a rar­i­ty, and despite her unusu­al stead­fast­ness, Katharine Hep­burn was no stranger to the fact. The per­sona she would assid­u­ous­ly con­struct and play with through­out her career was ini­tial­ly one of free-wheel­ing spon­tane­ity. From her metal­lic and marked­ly cin­e­mat­ic Mid-Atlantic accent to the way she – some­times aggres­sive­ly – relat­ed to the men in her films, she brought a nat­ur­al spark that intro­duced Amer­i­can audi­ences to the pos­si­bil­i­ty of a new mod­ern woman.

But the very real details of her uncon­ven­tion­al life – includ­ing her tomboy atti­tude — quick­ly became a ruse, a way for stu­dios to blur the lines between her char­ac­ters and Hep­burn her­self, a tac­tic she accept­ed with enthu­si­asm. It was this that so alarmed audi­ences in the 1930s and 40s, and it’s what makes Hep­burn such an endur­ing icon today. If she want­ed to be a real movie star, one remem­bered by future gen­er­a­tions, she would need to com­pro­mise. And so, she made The Philadel­phia Story.

By the time David Lean’s Sum­mer­time rolled around, Hepburn’s haughty tomboy­ish­ness had been done away with almost entire­ly, and she entered what some schol­ars refer to as her spin­ster cycle” – a series of films that fea­tured Hep­burn as a lone­ly, repressed, mid­dle-aged woman. The film fol­lows Jane (Hep­burn) as a self-described fan­cy sec­re­tary” from Akron, Ohio, on her first trip to Europe, where she expects to find a won­der­ful, mys­ti­cal, mag­i­cal mir­a­cle… what she has been miss­ing all her life,” but can’t quite put a name to. Like Hepburn’s own life, her char­ac­ter is marked by com­pro­mise, a ten­sion between her desires and what she believes to be right, often to self-destruc­tive degrees.

Though friends often remarked on Hepburn’s lack of intro­spec­tion (“Fear is no builder of char­ac­ter”), Lean pushed her down emo­tion­al avenues she would not have cho­sen her­self. Hep­burn moves dif­fer­ent­ly here; although her spright­ly humour retains its mag­ic, it is dimmed by abstract wor­ries and inse­cu­ri­ties, and what remains quick­ly reveals itself a mask, pro­tec­tive gear for her shame­ful lone­li­ness brought on by spinsterhood.

Ear­ly on in the film, she is left alone in the back­yard of the Pen­sione Fior­i­ni by the trav­ellers’ she failed to befriend, and we get a glimpse of her buried melan­choly. She walks through the ter­race to and fro, hands clasped behind her back rigid­ly, as if hold­ing the con­tents of her body togeth­er. But she dis­tracts her­self, and mes­merised by the music and nois­es of the city, her face opens with won­der. When two lovers come into frame, tears swell in her eyes; her alone­ness sud­den­ly becom­ing more tan­gi­ble. Only Venice’s scenery, with its bright hues and shad­owy alley­ways, brings her back to her­self again.

Two people in conversation, a woman in a white sweater and a man in a brown jacket, looking intently at each other.

Sum­mer­time suc­ceeds in no small part thanks to Lean’s sen­si­tiv­i­ty, his mas­tery of the moment and the flow of time. The film moves at the pace of its sea­son, like days spent leisure­ly gaz­ing up at the inter­minable blue­ness of the sky. Actu­al­ly, it takes an hour for the film to become a romance. Hep­burn reacts accord­ing­ly, both spell­bound by this new­found beau­ty and obvi­ous­ly oppressed by the quick pass­ing of time.

And what bet­ter set­ting than mer­cu­r­ial Venice, a city of romance, but also one that drowns with a few drops of rain, where cob­bled grounds become slip­pery and dan­ger­ous with­out warn­ing. It’s here where Jane even­tu­al­ly meets Rena­to (Rossano Brazzi), the man who will even­tu­al­ly become her lover, and he brings with him the pos­si­bil­i­ty of the mir­a­cle. Though ini­tial­ly denied, Jane’s attrac­tion is obvi­ous. She scans for him in crowds, hop­ing he will save her when she slips into the canals; her eyes, shroud­ed in ecsta­sy when gaz­ing at St Mark’s Basil­i­ca, flut­ter and glint sim­i­lar­ly in his presence.

But her desire is not straight­for­ward, and Hepburn’s phys­i­cal pres­ence com­mu­ni­cates Jane’s inter­nal con­flict per­fect­ly, let­ting us in on Jane’s secret: she both flinch­es and leans into his touch, retract­ing her body until the ten­sion between them can no longer be sus­tained. Hav­ing accept­ed the truth of her lone­li­ness for so long, the pos­si­bil­i­ty of union only brings fear. Of inad­e­qua­cy, of loss, of future lone­li­ness. This time with no expi­ra­tion date.

Whether close to the cam­era or lost in a crowd, the film delights in Hepburn’s gaze, as it trans­forms from awe-struck and shy to care­less ado­ra­tion. But it’s her unique voice that becomes most reveal­ing; both brit­tle and force­ful, it’s anoth­er limb of her com­mand­ing pres­ence. Though Jane her­self appears unaware of its pow­er, unlike Hepburn’s pre­vi­ous hero­ines, Hep­burn tuned it with pre­ci­sion to build and unmask Jane.

In the com­pa­ny of oth­er trav­ellers, Jane’s voice turns sol­id, cheer­ful – one could almost mis­take it for con­fi­dence. But in Renato’s pres­ence, it crum­bles. Imbued with a vul­ner­a­bil­i­ty unseen in most of her fil­mog­ra­phy, words fail and sen­tences fall apart. There’s a moment before she rejects sleep­ing with him when, her body pulled tight against his under the shad­ows of the night, when her voice cracks.

Towards the end of the film, Jane gives in and sleeps with Rena­to. Soon after, she admits that she’s leav­ing for Amer­i­ca. I’ve stayed at par­ties way too long because I didn’t know when to go. Now with you I’ve grown up; I think I do know when to,” Jane explains tear­ful­ly, know­ing full-well that their romance wouldn’t sur­vive real-world com­pli­ca­tions, like his marriage.

The warm, idyl­lic joy of sum­mer ends and so must their romance. But Jane has changed. In the final scenes, she glides com­fort­ably among the crowds, hands loose at her sides – no longer a soli­tary fig­ure. As the train pre­pares to leave, Rena­to runs after it, offer­ing Jane a gar­de­nia. His pace is too slow, and they nev­er meet – but an unguard­ed smile lights up Jane’s face, encap­su­lat­ing the film’s heart with remark­able sim­plic­i­ty and con­vinc­ing us that if we are ever to expe­ri­ence mir­a­cles, we must give in, com­plete­ly and uncon­di­tion­al­ly. As Rena­to says: We saw each oth­er. We liked each oth­er. This is so nice.”

Final­ly, body open to the world, Jane waves back at Rena­to from the train car­riage. And, once again, she becomes Katharine Hepburn.

You might like