In praise of Daisies | Little White Lies

In Praise Of

In praise of Daisies

05 Dec 2017

Woman with a flower crown holding a frame with two butterflies.
Woman with a flower crown holding a frame with two butterflies.
Don’t miss this explo­sion of fem­i­nist mer­ry-mak­ing in Věra Chytilová’s 1966 clas­sic, screen­ing with ICA and MUBI.

Two young women – one blonde and one brunette – sit on the floor in swim­suits, with their limbs askew. They are pas­sive, doll-like. They even­tu­al­ly rise, lift­ed up on invis­i­ble pup­pet strings with an added wood­en creak to indi­cate their every move­ment. So begins Vera Chytilova’s 1996 film Daisies (1966), a play­ful­ly sub­ver­sive take on women’s roles as seen through a jar­ring, anar­chic lens.

Chytilo­va, often con­sid­ered a key part of the Czech New Wave, grew up under strict Sovi­et rule in Czecho­slo­va­kia and was raised as a Catholic. This gave her an exhaus­tive edu­ca­tion in the lay­ers of pow­er and patri­archy. She worked var­i­ous jobs before she forced her way into the Prague Film School, becom­ing the only female stu­dent there. Through most of her life, Chytilo­va avoid­ed being labeled a fem­i­nist’, but make no mis­take: Daisies, her imp­ish sec­ond fea­ture, is a ripe com­men­tary on gen­der and hier­ar­chy in her nation.

If that sounds extreme­ly self-seri­ous and aca­d­e­m­ic, Daisies is far from it. The char­ac­ters run around Prague, prank­ing old­er men on dates, get­ting fall-down drunk, heck­ling peo­ple, and gen­er­al­ly laugh­ing at the chaos of the world around them. In a pre-’68 soci­ety, where art was dom­i­nat­ed by depic­tions of drudgery, or social­ist real­ism’ as it was termed, this film was an aggres­sive rejoin­der. It cul­mi­nates in a food fight of epic pro­por­tions, and the film was prompt­ly banned for food wastage’, among oth­er things.

In Daisies, form under­lines con­tent in a rad­i­cal man­ner. Ran­dom jump-cuts trans­port the view­er across time and space. There are abrupt switch­es from colour to black and white, and the oblique dia­logue helps make the pro­ceed­ings nar­ra­tive­ly unhinged. But this chop­py, expres­sive approach is riv­et­ing. It’s a world away from the pre­dictable stylings of main­stream cin­e­ma from the era. The two stars, Jit­ka Cer­ho­va and Ivana Kar­bano­va, were non-pro­fes­sion­als, but lit­tle else in Daisies could be said to con­form to the verite’ approach. It’s too eccen­tric; a slice of Dadaist insan­i­ty dressed up in girly clothes.

As a film­mak­er, Chytilo­va was infa­mous­ly demand­ing – she even admit­ted to phys­i­cal­ly attack­ing her cam­era­men when they got some­thing wrong. But she also had good rea­son for exac­ti­tude in her work. Liv­ing under a total­i­tar­i­an Sovi­et régime meant mak­ing her films with pre­cise, point­ed tar­gets and, with each new project, she placed her career on the line.

Daisies was banned for sev­er­al years after a Sovi­et clam­p­down in 1968, and author­i­ties were prob­a­bly right to be sus­pi­cious. The anar­chic spir­it of the film – par­tic­u­lar­ly its pre-punk mid­dle fin­ger to the estab­lish­ment – was summed up by the final ded­i­ca­tion in the film: Ded­i­cat­ed to those who get upset only over a stomped-upon bed of let­tuce.’ The response was painful: Chytilo­va was not per­mit­ted to make anoth­er film in her native coun­try until 1975.

Marie I and Marie II are hard­ly exem­plary. Their excess – clothes in bold colours, extrav­a­gant steak din­ners, etc – is the point­ed antithe­sis of the ide­al Sovi­et woman. The sar­to­r­i­al ele­ments of the film are strik­ing­ly con­tem­po­rary – tiny baby­doll dress­es, flower crowns, and thick black eye­lin­er. The overt girl­ish­ness would have seemed strange and slat­tern­ly in 60s Czecho­slo­va­kia. And as if this wasn’t bad enough, there are the dark­ly com­ic sex­u­al ele­ments at play: the girls cut up food items that are bla­tant phal­lic sym­bols: sausages, bananas. It’s no won­der the cen­sors were uncomfortable.

Even the char­ac­ters’ names offer a hint at the arche­typ­al dis­missal with which women are treat­ed. Marie I and Marie II are viewed as inter­change­able play­things by the old­er men they date – and annoy. Chytilo­va under­stands the fem­i­nine deco­rum expect­ed of women in Czech soci­ety, and she under­mines it at every turn. The girls laugh loud­ly, slurp their soup, lick their fin­gers and mis­be­have as a way of life. They act child­ish­ly, they’re irrev­er­ent and wild. Per­haps, most notably, they have enor­mous appetites for food and for adven­ture. They take up space and make noise in a soci­ety which has for­bid­den them from doing so.

Irre­spec­tive of the film’s polit­i­cal specifics, it’s this rebel­lious spir­it that feels so fresh. In an inter­view from 1967 with writer Antonin J Liehm, Chytilo­va said: We are still liv­ing as guests in a man’s world.” If this is so, the two women of Daisies are the world’s worst guests. They jump on the fur­ni­ture and swing from the chan­de­liers. A half cen­tu­ry lat­er, it’s still invig­o­rat­ing to see them do so.

Daisies plays as part of Light Show #1 – a sea­son of films on 35mm curat­ed by MUBI, the ICA and Lit­tle White Lies. The film screens on Sat­ur­day 9 Decem­ber at 2pm. Book tick­ets here.

You might like