Shirley – first look review | Little White Lies

Festivals

Shirley – first look review

26 Jan 2020

Words by Hannah Strong

Woman with glasses, blonde hair, and surprised expression.
Woman with glasses, blonde hair, and surprised expression.
Josephine Decker’s biog­ra­phy of famed goth­ic nov­el­ist Shirley Jack­son is a sump­tu­ous peri­od psychodrama.

Since her 2014 debut Thou Wast Mild and Love­ly, Josephine Deck­er has become a lead­ing light of Amer­i­can inde­pen­dent cin­e­ma, chal­leng­ing both sto­ry­telling and styl­is­tic con­ven­tions across a trio of bold, divi­sive films.

Her fourth fea­ture, Shirley, is her biggest to date; exec­u­tive pro­duced by Mar­tin Scors­ese and star­ring Elis­a­beth Moss and Michael Stuhlbarg. It’s also the first time Deck­er has direct­ed some­one else’s script, Sarah Gub­bins adapt­ing Susan Scarf Merrell’s nov­el of the same name into a sump­tu­ous peri­od psychodrama.

Inspired by the life of America’s first lady of goth­ic fic­tion, Shirley Jack­son, the film cen­tres on Fred Nemser (Logan Ler­man) and his wife Rose (Odessa Young), a sweet young cou­ple who move in with Jack­son (Moss) and her pro­fes­sor hus­band Stan­ley Hyman (Stuhlbarg) after Fred moves to Ver­mont to assist Hyman in teach­ing at the near­by women’s college.

Their rur­al home has become Shirley’s self-imposed prison, as she shrinks from pub­lic view and rumours about her men­tal state swirl around the locals and Stanley’s col­leagues. Rose – a fan of Jackson’s work – is instant­ly repelled by Jackson’s acid tongue and lack of hos­pi­tal­i­ty, but dis­gust soon turns to intrigue as the pair spend time togeth­er, and their com­plex rela­tion­ship inspires Jack­son to begin work on a new novel.

As with Decker’s pre­vi­ous fea­tures, But­ter on the Latch and Madeline’s Made­line, Shirley pri­mar­i­ly explores the intri­ca­cies of female rela­tion­ships, as the two cen­tral female char­ac­ters devel­op an infat­u­a­tion with each oth­er. Women’s desire – be it sex­u­al or pro­fes­sion­al – lies at the heart of this beguil­ing work, as women are cowed into sub­mis­sion lest they show up the men in their lives, while men are allowed to phi­lan­der and behave how­ev­er they want in the name of genius.

Two individuals, a man with a beard and glasses and a woman with glasses, both wearing casual clothing and sitting in a dimly lit room.

This dou­ble stan­dard still exists; to be a woman with any sort of tal­ent still feels like a threat, and is often greet­ed with sus­pi­cion. Jack­son is brand­ed a witch, and so per­haps makes her­self one: a mon­ster from her own ghost sto­ries. Her will­ing­ness to embrace the per­sona of the dif­fi­cult woman’ is matched by Rose’s desire to break free from the life set out for her; she has no desire to be a dot­ing, smil­ing-while-suf­fer­ing housewife.

Shirley and Rose are drawn to one anoth­er out of lone­li­ness but also under­stand­ing; the men who sur­round­ed them seem obsessed by pos­ses­sion, with no com­pre­hen­sion of how sub­mis­sion can be a form of get­ting what you want as well. Moss and Young are per­fect­ly matched, and while the for­mer is often at her best when play­ing out­landish, unlik­able women, Young is a rev­e­la­tion as the ingénue Rose. Also delight­ful: Michael Stuhlbarg’s smil­ing, deli­cious­ly odi­ous Stan­ley Hyman, who is not quite a vil­lain, though per­haps the clos­est thing in the film to one.

It helps that Gub­bins’ script sparkles with wit, wry­ly reflect­ing on aspects of wom­an­hood as well as the knot­ty cre­ative process. This is Decker’s fun­ni­est film to date, yet also her most inti­mate and erot­ic. Mush­rooms shared in a lush for­est clear­ing could invoke instant death; an evening din­ner invites an oppor­tu­ni­ty for hid­den flir­ta­tion. Rarely is female desire shown as some­thing mon­strous and invit­ing; usu­al­ly, it’s one or the other.

You might like