God’s Creatures – first-look review | Little White Lies

Festivals

God’s Crea­tures – first-look review

19 May 2022

Words by David Jenkins

Two people, a man and a woman, standing outside a building. The man wears a khaki jacket, while the woman wears a black jumper. They appear to be in a rural or outdoor setting.
Two people, a man and a woman, standing outside a building. The man wears a khaki jacket, while the woman wears a black jumper. They appear to be in a rural or outdoor setting.
Emi­ly Wat­son and Paul Mescal enter into a bat­tle of moth­er-son wills in this gor­geous­ly-mount­ed but uno­rig­i­nal Irish thriller.

Sev­en years on from her feisty, call­ing-card debut fea­ture, The Fits, direc­tor Anna Rose Holmer returns with some­thing com­plete­ly dif­fer­ent. Gone is the per­cus­sive, hyp­not­ic style of that stel­lar first film, and in its place comes some­thing more serene, seri­ous and classically-minded.

Holmer co-directs God’s Crea­tures with Saela Davis, and brings her luxe visu­al sen­si­bil­i­ty to this age-old tale of a black sheep boy return­ing to the fam­i­ly nest and caus­ing all sorts of emo­tion­al bal­ly­hoo. Said son, Bri­an, is played by man-of-the-moment Paul Mescal, who slinks into the role of a dirty-rot­ten oys­ter farmer with a side­line in ille­gal salmon poach­ing, among oth­er nefar­i­ous bits involv­ing local song­bird Sarah, played by Ais­ling Franciosi.

The film sees him expert­ly play on the dot­ing affec­tions of his saint­ly, com­mu­ni­ty-mind­ed moth­er, Aileen, who is beau­ti­ful­ly realised by the always-great Emi­ly Wat­son. What ini­tial­ly plays out as a grim social real­ist por­trait of hard­scrab­ble lives in a tra­di­tion­al Irish fish­ing vil­lage, soon segues into a dis­turb­ing fem­i­nist thriller with a hint of the Mil­dred Pearces about it, con­cern­ing as it does the lim­its of mater­nal pro­tec­tion and the ignored abus­es of awful men.

There is some­thing a lit­tle boil­er­plate about how the film is struc­tured which per­haps pre­vents it from access­ing the upper ech­e­lons of qual­i­ty and inter­est. It’s what you might call over tight”, in that there is no detail for detail’s sake, and it quick­ly becomes a game of guess the fore­shad­ow­ing device. All the inter­lock­ing plot frag­ments are so per­fect­ly aligned that the film ends up feel­ing sti­fling, and also it goes too far out of its way to answer all the ques­tions it pos­es about the moral­i­ty of the sit­u­a­tion in which the char­ac­ters find them­selves. So not one to pon­der for very long once the cred­its have rolled.

Still, the cast ful­ly com­mit to their meaty roles, and the dark ener­gy between Mescal and Wat­son keeps things bob­bing above the tide nice­ly. What does nudge this above sim­i­lar­ly-inclined social-real­ist thrillers is Chayse Irvin’s atmos­pher­ic cin­e­matog­ra­phy, whose omi­nous blue-green vis­tas clev­er­ly imbues the mate­r­i­al with goth­ic ghost sto­ry trap­pings. Indeed, the film opens on a young fish­er­man falling to his per­il – appar­ent­ly they don’t learn to swim as a deter­rent for jump­ing out of the boat – and his spec­tral pres­ence returns to claim var­i­ous oth­er souls.

The sound design, too, is used to sharp effect, as Aileen is con­stant­ly tor­ment­ed by the pelt of dri­ving rain, or the con­tin­u­al loud clack­ing of oys­ter shells drop­ping off a con­vey­or-belt. These sud­den bursts of noise – which include a non-diegetic Irish drum sound that only Aileen seems to hear – are all the more effec­tive for being in such an oth­er­wise hushed film. Char­ac­ters talk in whis­pered tones, that is until they’re yelling at one anoth­er on the beer-soaked floor of the local dive bar. It’s a neat lit­tle manœu­vre that’s exe­cut­ed with admirable skill, but as with the tem­plat­ed plot­ting, it also comes across as the robust deploy­ment of a tried-and-test­ed move” rather than some­thing new and exciting.

You might like