I, Daniel Blake – first look review | Little White Lies

Festivals

I, Daniel Blake – first look review

13 May 2016

Words by David Jenkins

A group of people standing in an office environment, including a woman in a dark jacket holding a young child and a man in a suit next to them.
A group of people standing in an office environment, including a woman in a dark jacket holding a young child and a man in a suit next to them.
Ken Loach returns to Cannes with a ranty anti-gov­ern­ment, anti-bureau­cra­cy screed. Not all of it lands.

If this film didn’t have a title card stat­ing the name of its direc­tor, you’d still have no trou­ble iden­ti­fy­ing him before any images actu­al­ly appear on screen. Dur­ing the open­ing cred­its, arche­typ­al salt-of-the-earth work­ing class hero Daniel Blake (Dave Johns) is stul­ti­fied by the ques­tions he’s being asked in order to com­plete a health ben­e­fits form, a nec­es­sary pro­ce­dure to secure income after a recent heart attack has ren­dered him unable to work.

His joc­u­lar, unhelp­ful answers empha­sise not so much the idio­cy of the ques­tions, but how cold­ly demean­ing they are – can you raise your hands above your head, can you press the but­tons on a phone, etc. From then on it’s a tale of Daniel vs Goliath as he bat­tles with the twin bureau­cra­cies of a pri­vate health firm based in the US and oper­at­ed large­ly through face­less call cen­tres, and the Job Cen­tre, whose own staff are depict­ed as being one remove away from death camp foot sol­diers. Yes, we’re on a din­ner date of pease pud­ding and Mighty White with the people’s very own champ, Ken Loach.

In this real­ist melo­dra­ma, Loach and screen­writer Paul Laver­ty take great pains to paint Daniel as a hob­bled mar­tyr, lov­able in each and every way, a bloke you’d want to slap on the back and sink a few pints with. Where his blood may boil when deskbound automa­tons aggres­sive­ly ask if he under­stands the what they’re ask­ing him (prob­a­bly to be able to tick some damn box or oth­er), he’s a paragon of qui­et com­pas­sion when it comes to help­ing oth­ers. Name­ly Katie Mor­gan (Hay­ley Squires), who is anoth­er vic­tim of those heart­less gov­ern­ment job­sworths hav­ing been forcibly relo­cat­ed from Lon­don to New­cas­tle, away from her moth­er and the school of her two cheru­bic children.

There is lit­tle to no nuance in this film, or enough that con­vinces it should be a film rather than a long-read rant in the Social­ist Work­er, or a bull­horn protest in front of par­lia­ment. If any­thing, it would appear to be doing more harm than good, employ­ing hasti­ly drawn car­toons as its antag­o­nists and using cheap sen­ti­ment as polit­i­cal cap­i­tal. The Mephistophe­lean evil of The Sys­tem is ramped up at every oppor­tu­ni­ty, and Loach crude­ly co-opts Blake’s dodgy heart as the film’s tick­ing time bomb. There are instances when Blake’s down­fall is the result of his own stub­born­ness, yet it’s always per­mis­si­ble and often used as a cud­gel to attack his oppres­sors’ basic lack of humanism.

Blun­der­buss though it all may be, a major plus point is the nat­u­ral­is­tic, not over­ly feisty per­for­mance by young actress Hay­ley Squires who sub­tly chan­nels gen­uine dis­il­lu­sion­ment in her attempts to shield her chil­dren from the dark future they poten­tial­ly, prob­a­bly have ahead of them. Still in her ear­ly twen­ties, she bril­liant­ly paints a char­ac­ter who appears to have already con­sumed and sup­pressed many life­times worth of ago­nis­ing expe­ri­ence, but is only just com­ing to terms with much of its long term con­se­quence. There’s one tear-jerk­ing moment which, in less­er hands, could’ve nudged this to the gar­ish lev­els of mis­ery porn par­o­dy, but her com­mit­ment and poise save it.

But as usu­al for Loach, this is cin­e­ma as a blunt instru­ment, used to hit hard and with­out much grace or sense of direc­tion. It’s a large­ly art­less work which takes no risks with its visu­al lan­guage and nev­er thinks to show when it can tell. A sub­plot involv­ing a young neigh­bour sell­ing coun­ter­feit train­ers is entire­ly for­got­ten about, while Loach nev­er once seems to believe that less might just be more.

It’s also a polemic which is unin­ter­est­ed in solu­tions, in sug­gest­ing ways in which these prob­lems could be alle­vi­at­ed. It believes that argu­ments are won by focus­ing on neg­a­tives rather than out­class­ing your oppo­nent with a con­vinc­ing, pro­gres­sive alter­na­tive. It’s a film which talks exclu­sive­ly to the peo­ple who are already on side with every­thing it has to say.

You might like