Crazy “lost” film unearthed at the 2016 American… | Little White Lies

Festivals

Crazy lost” film unearthed at the 2016 Amer­i­can Film Festival

07 Nov 2016

Words by Matt Thrift

Cluttered shelving unit with stacked plates, cups, and other kitchenware. A young child is visible in the foreground, looking at the items on the shelves.
Cluttered shelving unit with stacked plates, cups, and other kitchenware. A young child is visible in the foreground, looking at the items on the shelves.
This year’s AFF end­ed with an eye-pop­ping cin­e­mat­ic spec­ta­cle – a film unseen for 50 years.

On the penul­ti­mate night of this year’s Amer­i­can Film Fes­ti­val, a huge crowd thronged the foy­er of Wrocław’s Kino Nowe Hory­zon­ty await­ing the sold-out Pol­ish pre­mière of Jeff Nichols’ Lov­ing. Across the room, a hand­ful of peo­ple filed into a small­er screen for a curios­i­ty buried at the back of the fes­ti­val pro­gramme. With an unas­sum­ing image accom­pa­ny­ing the blurb, and an unheard-of direc­tor list­ed, these adven­tur­ous few didn’t have much to go on:

Escaped patients from a men­tal hos­pi­tal hold up in an aban­doned house where they per­form impro­vised rit­u­als. A visu­al­i­sa­tion of the sound, rhythm, and tem­po of the sound­track by Mar­i­anne Faith­full, Ramon Ybar­ra, and Nino Fer­rer, the film received the bless­ing of none oth­er than Sal­vador Dali.”

Lit­tle warn­ing then that we were about to spend 73 min­utes with one of the most eye-pop­ping cin­e­mat­ic spec­ta­cles to sur­face this year – with­out ques­tion the find of the festival.

Who’s Crazy? received its pre­mière at the Cannes Film Fes­ti­val in 1966. It had received a screen­ing the pre­vi­ous year in Locarno, pri­or to the addi­tion of a free­wheel­ing score by a cer­tain Ornette Cole­man. A 1967 screen­ing due to be held in Lon­don was can­celled as a result of the film’s report­ed atti­tude towards law enforce­ment. It remained unscreened for the next 50 years.

Enquiries into the where­abouts of the film had trou­bled jazz schol­ars and Cannes his­to­ri­ans alike. Accord­ing to Richard Brody, writ­ing in The New York­er ear­li­er this year, it took the enter­pris­ing efforts of Cole­man-enthu­si­ast Vanes­sa McDon­nell to track down the sole extant print of a film long-con­sid­ered lost. McDon­nell had called every Thomas White – the film’s cred­it­ed direc­tor – in the phone book, until she got lucky. The Thomas White in ques­tion hadn’t made a sec­ond fea­ture, retir­ing from film­mak­ing after a stint as a pro­duc­er and cam­era­man for indus­tri­al film com­pa­nies to breed Ara­bi­an hors­es in Con­necti­cut. He told McDon­nell he had a print of the film in his garage.

Culled from over 10 hours of footage shot in Bel­gium across 12 days in the win­ter of 1964 – 5, Who’s Crazy? defies nar­ra­tive syn­op­sis beyond that skele­tal­ly-sketched in the AFF pro­gramme. Liv­ing in Paris at the time, White had found him­self neigh­boured by mem­bers of the Liv­ing The­ater, an Amer­i­can impro­visato­ry troupe in Euro­pean exile while its found­ing mem­bers served prison terms for tax evasion.

There was a lot of smoke in the room,” said White of the pro­duc­tion in a recent inter­view with the New York Times. Not that it served to damp­en the high-octane ener­gies of those involved. One can imag­ine the director’s dis­ap­point­ment at the Locarno screen­ing, giv­en how impos­si­ble it is to imag­ine the film with­out Coleman’s score. Record­ed in a sin­gle, impro­vised ses­sion with his Gold­en Cir­cle’ trio of Charles Mof­fatt on drums and David Izen­zon on bass, Ornette plays as much trum­pet and vio­lin here as he does his alto sax. The band find their notes as the actors find their way through the space; as play­ful and exper­i­men­tal as it is melo­di­ous. It all makes for an intense syn­the­sis of sound and image, the film large­ly free from dia­logue, if far from silent.

When dia­logue does come, it’s large­ly non­sen­si­cal; almost pri­mal­ly impul­sive. What is man? What is life? What is the pur­pose of exis­tence?” shrieks one woman to no one in par­tic­u­lar. Hav­ing raid­ed a dress­ing-up box in the dilap­i­dat­ed farm­house the escaped patients find them­selves inhab­it­ing, a man in a din­ner jack­et fields dead­pan obser­va­tions from anoth­er dressed in a tril­by and over­coat, The milk­man says inde­cent things to me too.”

Non-sequitur fol­lows non-sequitur, recall­ing the vast impro­vi­sa­tion scenes from Jacques Rivette’s TV opus, Out 1 – unsur­pris­ing per­haps giv­en the two works share a mag­nif­i­cent edi­tor in Denise de Casabi­an­ca. The games of chil­dren, pure and free like the wind,” states one char­ac­ter in the film’s sin­gle intel­li­gi­ble mono­logue. All the male­dic­tions, the out­casts, the scum final­ly meet,” he cries, That man is sleep­ing… He’s danc­ing, like all of you are danc­ing.” So fused to the onscreen rhythm – or polyrhythms – is the aston­ish­ing sound­track, that it appears to be pro­pelling and dic­tat­ing the onscreen action, despite its post-record­ing mean­ing the oppo­site to be true. The notion of the film as dance takes hold, not least in the cli­mac­tic wed­ding cer­e­mo­ny; an esca­lat­ing shaman­ic rit­u­al scored by walk­ing organ dirge, pound­ing drums and impos­si­bly funky bass.

Ear­li­er in the fes­ti­val, Antonioni’s Zabriskie Point had screened as part of a sep­a­rate strand. It was hard not to think of that film’s explo­sive end­ing, blow­ing every­thing to hell while blar­ing Pink Floyd. The anar­chism embed­ded in Who’s Crazy? felt way more sub­ver­sive – more aggres­sive­ly mod­ern – than the sociopo­lit­i­cal speci­fici­ty of the lat­er film; its dis­re­gard for the niceties of nar­ra­tive or cin­e­mat­ic con­ven­tion unteth­ered from counter-cul­tur­al contemporaneity.

As Cole­man explores the dynam­ic pos­si­bil­i­ties of free-jazz, so White applies a sim­i­lar method­ol­o­gy to notions of cin­e­mat­ic form. Jump-cuts and sped-up action destroy any notion of the pass­ing of time – we’ve lit­tle sense of how long these peo­ple are holed up in the farm­house – while open­ing and clos­ing chase sequences with bum­bling author­i­ties con­jure Key­stone runarounds from a play­ful visu­al style. It’s impos­si­ble to tell what one man is try­ing to do with an open stove at one point, as he stokes it, tries to open it, gobs in it. Not that it ulti­mate­ly mat­ters. As Ornette honks away and White ramps the frame-rate, the final effect is sheer sen­so­ry wonder.

If the film says lit­tle more about crazi­ness’ beyond point­ing out its inher­ent con­nec­tion to the bonds of imposed social order, it does so in pure­ly cin­e­mat­ic terms. An arte­fact from a bygone era, not in the sense of the film’s con­tent, but in respect of a time in which such fear­less­ly avant-garde work was get­ting made. Jeff Nichols’ film was prob­a­bly fine and every­thing, but that audi­ence have no idea what they missed in the next room.

For more on the Amer­i­can Film Fes­ti­val vis­it amer​i​can​film​fes​ti​val​.pl

You might like