Why Les Rendez-vous d’Anna is one of the great… | Little White Lies

In Praise Of

Why Les Ren­dez-vous d’Anna is one of the great films about loneliness

13 Jan 2019

Words by Gus Edgar-Chan

Young woman in rust-coloured jacket, sitting pensively with hand on chin.
Young woman in rust-coloured jacket, sitting pensively with hand on chin.
A young woman search­es for con­nec­tion in Chan­tal Akerman’s melan­choly trav­el­ogue from 1978.

I’ve expe­ri­enced lone­li­ness before. So have you. Every­one has at some point or oth­er. For some, it’s the inabil­i­ty to find inter­ac­tions mean­ing­ful; for oth­ers, inter­ac­tion itself is the obsta­cle. It can stem from anx­i­ety, expe­ri­ence and peri­patet­ic neces­si­ty. It can be roman­tic, famil­ial or sex­u­al in nature. In Chan­tal Akerman’s 1978 dra­ma Les Ren­dez-vous d’Anna (Anna’s Meet­ing), the tit­u­lar char­ac­ter embod­ies all this and more.

Aurore Clé­ment por­trays Anna, a Bel­gian direc­tor with an unspec­i­fied sex­u­al­i­ty and an extra­or­di­nar­i­ly pow­er­ful rela­tion­ship with her moth­er. To sug­gest the film is per­son­al to Aker­man would be an under­state­ment; this is as much of a semi-auto­bi­o­graph­i­cal solil­o­quy as it is an invi­ta­tion into the tur­bu­lent head­space of a great director.

For­mal­ly, how­ev­er, the film is mea­sured. The cam­era is con­stant­ly anchored to a sin­gle point, its sub­ject direct­ly in the cen­tre of frame. This can give the impres­sion of a long­ing stare – in one swoon­ing moment, the cam­era is fixed to the win­dow of a mov­ing train, scan­ning the emp­ty sta­tions it pass­es. It can also fore­warn of what Anna will be drawn to, demon­strat­ed in the film’s open­ing shot, which sees her pull away from a crowd and set­tle alone in a tele­phone box. The film is sat­u­rat­ed in this wist­ful and con­tem­pla­tive atmos­phere – lone­li­ness isn’t just iso­la­tion for the sake of it. Aker­man knows that. The steady rhythm of a train’s win­dow-side view can be a relief, the four walls of a tele­phone box a safe haven.

Anna is the type of per­son who’s fig­ur­ing out how con­tent she is with her posi­tion in life. Her actions can be con­tra­dic­to­ry: order­ing a hotel room for her­self with twin beds; putting on per­fume and cov­er­ing it up with a turtle­neck. Clément’s expres­sion is often caught between indif­fer­ence and res­ig­na­tion. As she tra­vers­es Europe, a soul­less land­scape with a palette dull enough to wor­ry Roy Ander­s­son, Les Ren­dez-vous takes on the form of anthol­o­gy – one with a yearn­ing, rue­ful throughline.

A woman in red jacket and skirt walking through glass doors labelled "AUSGANG" in a modern building.

She meets a suc­ces­sion of equal­ly lost souls: an enam­oured man; the moth­er of a for­mer fiancé; a despon­dent train pas­sen­ger; Anna’s own moth­er; her lover in Paris. Most lament their strug­gles to Anna – post-war blues and nos­tal­gic remorse emerge as the­mat­ic strands. She nods and lis­tens, or gives a oui’ when need­ed. She doesn’t offer up any sto­ries of her own. Her input is reac­tionary – often it’s nonexistent.

Whether Anna is com­fort­able by her lone­some remains ambigu­ous for much of the film’s run­time. It’s nev­er clar­i­fied if she’s hap­py to stay silent in these one-sided con­ver­sa­tions, or if she’s sim­ply unable to do any­thing else. Small details in the nar­ra­tive allow you to infer mean­ing, but remain objec­tive in how that mean­ing should be per­ceived: peas plucked from an aban­doned din­ner plate, an enig­mat­ic car­riage-bound stare, the sta­t­ic of a faulty television.

Much like Akerman’s most cel­e­brat­ed film, Jeanne Diel­man, this rou­tine doesn’t last. Rup­tures appear in Anna’s pre­vi­ous­ly unwa­ver­ing gaze. Her coun­te­nance changes, and the objec­tiv­i­ty breaks down. She fights against tears when leav­ing her moth­er; they flood out lat­er in the back­seat of a taxi. A mourn­ful singsong shifts Anom­al­isas Girls Just Want to Have Fun’ moment, where mount­ing inse­cu­ri­ties are final­ly lib­er­at­ed, to the per­spec­tive of the woman. And the final scene dev­as­tat­ing­ly snuffs out any form of res­o­lu­tion. Lone­li­ness isn’t per­ma­nent, but it won’t leave if you just treat it with silence. In turn, Les Ren­dez-vous plays out as a plea for help.

That’s not to say that the film is entire­ly defeatist. Anna finds solace in her moth­er, a fig­ure who looms on the periph­ery before their ren­dezvous, and lingers well after. Their embrace is shot at a dis­tance; it belongs to them and not the audi­ence. When her moth­er talks of her father, Anna is with­drawn – this encounter threat­ens to play out like the rest. But something’s dif­fer­ent. She’s bear­ing a ten­ta­tive smile – the smile of a woman not used to one. Lat­er, she con­fides in her moth­er about a les­bian encounter. It’s the only tid­bit of per­son­al infor­ma­tion she divulges in the film. It’s also its most shat­ter­ing­ly inti­mate moment.

The disclosure’s sig­nif­i­cance is not nec­es­sar­i­ly how it’s being described, but that it’s being described. Lone­li­ness can ren­der some­one mute; a gen­uine con­nec­tion can give some­one back their voice. As Anna cries in the back of that taxi, she looks out to a road dot­ted with oth­er cabs. Each one may as well be car­ry­ing a sim­i­lar lost soul. Aker­man under­stands that lone­li­ness is a col­lec­tive issue, that ignor­ing it will only exac­er­bate it, and that con­fid­ing in some­one can be cathar­tic. We may have all expe­ri­enced lone­li­ness at some point in our lives, but noth­ing trans­lates it on to screen quite as accu­rate­ly and auda­cious­ly as this.

You might like