Why I love Joan Crawford’s performance in Daisy… | Little White Lies

In Praise Of

Why I love Joan Crawford’s per­for­mance in Daisy Kenyon

23 Mar 2020

Words by Justine Smith

A woman with dark curly hair wearing a black dress, smiling as she holds a telephone receiver.
A woman with dark curly hair wearing a black dress, smiling as she holds a telephone receiver.
Otto Preminger’s 1947 love tri­an­gle with a post­war twist sees the Hol­ly­wood star at her bristling best.

Joan Craw­ford moves into the light, just bare­ly. Her eyes are boxed in by the sur­round­ing dark­ness and her face framed by the shoul­ders of a man. What seems like a sin­gle light source reflects on her misty eyes as her late-light lover offers her, on a sil­ver plate, every­thing she’s been wait­ing for. Come live with me and be my love,” he tells her.

Torn between two men; a mar­ried big shot lawyer, Dan O’Mara (Dana Andrews) and an emo­tion­al­ly dis­tant recent­ly wid­owed vet­er­an, Peter Lapham (Hen­ry Fon­da). With an estab­lished career and her own apart­ment, it’s not that she needs to find a hus­band, but it’s some­thing she wants. Daisy Keny­on wants some­one to choose her and love her above any­one else. Would she give it all up though, to make the world a bet­ter place?

Otto Preminger’s film embod­ies near­ly all the aes­thet­ic trap­pings of the then-emerg­ing film noir genre. Pho­tographed in high-con­trast black-and-white, a rain­storm is ever-threat­en­ing, and the locales, stripped of glam­our, almost seem real. It’s a film about the moral­ly ambigu­ous, but unlike most films of the genre, there is no mur­der or heist, the only crime is an out in the open adultery.

The dra­ma, rather than mined from back-alleys and gin-joints, emerges from the prob­lems fac­ing adults in a world that seems to have lost its moral ground­ing. In a world of lost souls, the choice between right and wrong becomes more dif­fi­cult to parse; the deci­sion between the indi­vid­ual ver­sus the col­lec­tive not quite so obvious.

Forty-two at the time she agreed to star in Premingers film, Crawford was old by Hollywoods standards.

In many ways, Daisy Keny­on feels like an anom­aly, a movie that skirts between noir and melo­dra­ma – all the while anchored by Crawford’s per­for­mance. Not long after the suc­cess of Mil­dred Pierce, she had entered a new stage of her career. While she main­tained her ele­gance, the roles she took on reflect­ed her age; she was old­er and more estab­lished. Out of the shad­ow of the War, Crawford’s char­ac­ters sud­den­ly had careers and ambi­tions. Cru­cial­ly, Craw­ford nev­er entire­ly shed her work­ing-class edge.

Her large eyes and mys­te­ri­ous smile suit­ed char­ac­ters who sought to main­tain a deter­mined façade while reveal­ing their true desires through the small­est ges­tures. Forty-two at the time she agreed to star in Preminger’s film, Craw­ford was old by Hollywood’s stan­dards, yet no one was going to tell her she could no longer play ingenues. Women no longer felt as though they were mere­ly wives or moth­ers, want­ed to see their work and desires reflect­ed on the big screen, and Craw­ford leaned into this grow­ing demand.

A life­time since it pre­miered, Daisy Keny­on still res­onates in large part due to Craw­ford. Here is a woman who had it all but yearned to have more; in the process, find­ing her­self torn between her own free­dom and a strug­gle for what is right. Craw­ford ele­vates the film’s rel­a­tive­ly low stakes by embody­ing a woman who is will­ing to give up her small dreams to make the world bet­ter, even as that bat­tle for good increas­ing­ly seemed like a dis­tant or impos­si­ble reality.

You might like