Macbeth – first look review | Little White Lies

Festivals

Mac­beth – first look review

23 May 2015

Words by David Jenkins

Man with red beard wearing ornate crown and robes, seated on throne
Man with red beard wearing ornate crown and robes, seated on throne
The stun­ning pros and unfor­tu­nate cons in Justin Kurzel’s take on the Bard just about bal­ance out.

Behold vile por­tents! A sign of things to come can be spied in the typog­ra­phy to the open­ing cred­its of Justin Kurzel’s his­tor­i­cal real­ist, Rid­ley Scot­ti­fied big screen punt at The Scot­tish Play, with small red serif char­ac­ters clus­tered tight­ly on to a black back­drop. You know just from the impact with which those let­ters abrupt­ly emerge onto the screen that happy/​fun times do not lay ahead. It’s a hor­ror­show invite, make no mis­take. And yet, per­haps the main prob­lem with this new adap­ta­tion is that it’s nev­er as nasty, ago­nis­ing, blood-flecked and oper­at­i­cal­ly despair­ing as this macabre open­ing gam­bit might suggest.

Nor, indeed, does it hold a gore torch to Roman Polanski’s 1971 take with Jon Finch, a film for which its pro­duc­er Hugh Hefn­er clear­ly encour­aged tor­rid excess at every gris­ly turn. And Kurzel does have form in this area: his pre­vi­ous fea­ture, Snow­town, boast­ed scenes of smashed kan­ga­roo entrails being dumped on front porch­es as a neat way to ter­rorise the neigh­bours. And like this film, this is anoth­er exam­i­na­tion into the mag­net­ic lure of vio­lence as a way to tran­scend ones’s mea­gre social standing.

His new Mac­beth, though, is some­thing of a pre-water­shed deal. Sure there’s vio­lence, but its impact has been mut­ed, hid­den, tucked under the seams. We won’t state exact­ly, but a major amend­ment has been made to the play’s cli­max, and it won’t only cause Shake­speare schol­ars to gag on their Merlot.

Kurzel’s strat­e­gy for this film is strip­ping the sto­ry of any pre­tence of the­atri­cal­i­ty, and retool­ing it as a bleak, kitchen-sink vision of a paranoiac’s bun­gled regal pow­er-grab. When we first see the Weird Sis­ters on the field of bat­tle, they intone their lines in a haunt­ing ama­teur­ish monot­o­ne, like they’re toy­ing with the icon­ic poet­ics of the words.

You don’t, how­ev­er, hire Michael Fass­ben­der and Mar­i­on Cotil­lard in the slen­der hope they’ll dial things back at the ser­vice of some half-heart­ed post-mod­ern vision. They duly gnaw the scenery hard, their per­for­mances arriv­ing wreathed in cos­met­ic blood and spit­tle. High­lights include Fassbender’s reg­u­lar gut­tur­al addi­tions to the text, includ­ing a giant woop!” when return­ing from his sec­ond vis­it to the sisters.

You get the sense that – aside from the nat­u­ral­is­tic per­for­mances – Kurzel want­ed to make some­thing that was a tad more expres­sion­is­tic, but even­tu­al­ly felt behold­en to the hal­lowed text. As such, the dynamism and the poet­ry of the dia­logue nev­er tru­ly seeps from the screen, and you’re left with a bunch of actors inton­ing lines you don’t real­ly believe they under­stand, which in turn under­mines the over­tures towards this mud-caked real­ism. Two lengthy solil­o­quies are filmed in long takes which ends up being a tri­umph of hol­low tech­ni­cal bravu­ra over actu­al trans­mit­ting of the meaty ideas that unequiv­o­cal­ly jut out from this most ripe of texts.

Anoth­er strange and pos­si­bly fool­hardy tac­tic is that Kurzel, by adding a brief pro­logue, has attempt­ed to sup­ply a ratio­nal con­text to the severe actions of Mac­beth and his Lady. As they stand weep­ing by the par­tial­ly-decay­ing corpse of a child (assumed to be theirs), the infer­ence is that the mad­ness to come is the result of grief and a fur­ther affront to Macbeth’s man­li­ness. It also serves to soft­en them as char­ac­ters, and why any­one would ever want to do that defies all log­ic. Deduc­ing the mys­te­ri­ous root cause of their unal­loyed luna­cy is all part of the fun.

Final­ly, what pre­vents Mac­beth from head­ing direct­ly into the pan­theon of great Shake­speare adap­ta­tions is the feel­ing that it has been too abridged. It’s so beau­ti­ful­ly put togeth­er, its themes so ter­ri­fy­ing­ly grandiose, its world so painstak­ing­ly sculpt­ed, that it’s a film you could eas­i­ly – eas­i­ly! – have sat with for anoth­er hour at the very least. There are no beats between the plot points. There’s no sense of a devel­op­ing mania. The con­nect­ing tis­sue between the moments of high import have been sliced back until all you have is a tight­ly-packed pro­ces­sion of famous set-pieces. Only in the final moments does Kurzel allow him­self a lit­tle room to play, though it’s too lit­tle, too late.

You might like