Family fragments and domestic disruptions at… | Little White Lies

Festivals

Fam­i­ly frag­ments and domes­tic dis­rup­tions at Glas­gow FrightFest

29 Feb 2016

Words by Anton Bitel

A person in a purple jacket hugs another person tightly as they stand outdoors at night surrounded by other people.
A person in a purple jacket hugs another person tightly as they stand outdoors at night surrounded by other people.
Nor­we­gian dis­as­ter movie The Wave was among the high­lights of Scotland’s annu­al car­ni­val of genre.

When Sis­ter Sledge sang we are fam­i­ly” in 1979, they were refer­ring to the fact that their four mem­bers were actu­al sib­lings. Since then those three words have been adopt­ed as a catch­cry by Fright­Fest to cap­ture the sense of close com­mu­ni­ty among genre fans – relat­ed if not by genes, then cer­tain­ly by blood. Fright­Festers are indeed fam­i­ly, just not of the nuclear vari­ety (unless Jupiter’s irra­di­at­ed clan in 2006 remake of The Hills Have Eyes counts).

As the unit of human cur­ren­cy upon which soci­eties (and their many taboos) are found­ed, fam­i­ly is also, unsur­pris­ing­ly, a fre­quent pre­oc­cu­pa­tion of hor­ror – and at this year’s Glas­gow Fright­Fest, the fam­i­ly theme kept reecho­ing, as both mir­ror and coun­ter­point to the audience.

Take Roar Uthaug’s The Wave, which human­is­es its geo­log­i­cal dis­as­ter sce­nario with a par­al­lel domes­tic dra­ma. We’re not split­ting up,” geol­o­gist Kris­t­ian Eikjord (Kristof­fer Jon­er) reas­sures his young daugh­ter after he has has a minor argu­ment with his wife, Every­thing will be fine again.” Yet split­ting and upheaval of anoth­er kind threat­en this family’s core integri­ty, as a mas­sive tee­ter­ing rock sep­a­rates itself from a cliff face into the fjord below, send­ing a tow­er of water towards the Eikjords’ pic­turesque vil­lage of Geiranger.

Sep­a­rat­ed – at least phys­i­cal­ly – from his wife and son, Kris­t­ian must fight through over­whelm­ing dev­as­ta­tion to bring his fam­i­ly back togeth­er, and so a high­ly plau­si­ble future dis­as­ter sce­nario is exploit­ed for cat­a­clysmic spec­ta­cle, while simul­ta­ne­ous­ly used as a metaphor for under­ly­ing ten­sions in the fam­i­ly struc­ture. What Kris­t­ian and his loved ones learn is that while nature can­not be reversed, fam­i­ly – and soci­ety – can always be rebuilt.

Yet as Uthaug once again brings genre to Nor­way (as he did with his 2006 slash­er Cold Prey, glimpsed briefly on a character’s tele­vi­sion set here), there is lit­tle doubt, amid all the mass destruc­tion and death, that the nice Eikjords will weath­er the storm and resume their dis­rupt­ed lives of bour­geois con­tent­ment. In this respect, Kevin and Michael Goetz’s Mar­tyrs proved more appeal­ing – although in every oth­er respect this remake of Pas­cal Laugier’s 2008 shock­er is an infe­ri­or prod­uct. For its first half slav­ish­ly imi­tates the orig­i­nal, its sec­ond half unnec­es­sar­i­ly alters it, both to equal­ly point­less effect.

The icky messi­ness that gave Laugier’s film its vis­cer­al impact has been watered down and sani­tised here, while the gen­uine­ly tran­scen­dent end­ing of the orig­i­nal is banal­ly reduced to a eulo­gy for friend­ship. Yet what has been retained, and becomes wel­come­ly sub­ver­sive in this new transat­lantic con­text, is the corn­fed, thor­ough­ly mid­dle-class nuclear fam­i­ly at the film’s core. It is the kind of fam­i­ly that embod­ies the very val­ues of the Amer­i­can dream – and yet here, that family’s afflu­ence and suc­cess, indeed its whole way of life, has been built upon the suf­fer­ing of the mar­gin­alised and the mis­for­tu­nate that it places quite lit­er­al­ly beneath itself. Sig­nif­i­cant­ly, the hero­ines are both orphans, lib­er­at­ed from the norms of fam­i­ly struc­ture that are here exposed as so vicious­ly exploitative.

The Devil’s Can­dy, Sean Byrne’s long-await­ed fol­low-up to 2009’s The Loved Ones, opens in a Tex­an farm­house, with track-suit­ed man-child Ray (Pruitt Vince Tay­lor) play­ing pow­er chords on his amped-up Gib­son Fly­ing V to drown out the demon­ic voic­es in his head. When Ray’s par­ents get in the way of his throb­bing noise, he mur­ders them. The focus then shifts to the Hell­man fam­i­ly, who move into this home with a gris­ly his­to­ry – and who are the kind of alter­na­tive fam­i­ly with whom Fright­Festers will eas­i­ly identify.

With his tat­toos, his Man­son-esque groom­ing and his love of the demon weed and the devil’s music, painter Jesse may look the part of Satan­ic ves­sel, but is in fact (like so many hor­ror fans whose appear­ance he repli­cates), a sweet-natured pussy­cat. He is also caught in a Faus­t­ian predica­ment, hav­ing to com­pro­mise him­self on art com­mis­sions from banks to pay the mort­gage, or to exag­ger­ate his bad­boy image for hip­ster gal­leries. The farm­house awak­ens in Jesse a new, sin­is­ter dri­ve, even as Ray returns with dev­il­ish designs on Jesse’s teen daugh­ter Zooey (Kiera Glasco).

Byrne’s film plays upon the dynam­ic con­trast between these two fam­i­ly men’, often cross-cut­ting between their actions: Ray enact­ing his dark­er urges in unspeak­able out­rages against the inno­cent, Jesse sub­li­mat­ing them in his won­der­ful­ly dis­turb­ing’ art. Yet while The Devil’s Can­dy presents itself as an arche­typ­al clash of good and evil, and wraps itself in Chris­t­ian iconog­ra­phy and ide­ol­o­gy, its con­flict takes place as much with­in as between Jesse and Ray, so that its dra­ma of errant mas­culin­i­ty comes with a decid­ed­ly psy­cho­log­i­cal edge.

Mean­while the audi­ence is wrenched this way and that in try­ing to deter­mine whether, as his fam­i­ly life keeps get­ting in the way of his call­ing, the sym­pa­thet­i­cal­ly pre­sent­ed Jesse might just pos­si­bly be a Ray in the mak­ing. No doubt Byrne is here work­ing through some of his own feel­ings as an artist and fam­i­ly man – and his great restraint in let­ting the film’s most mon­strous acts take place in our heads rather than on screen pays hor­rif­ic div­i­dends, plac­ing The Devil’s Can­dy in the same genet­ic line of dys­func­tion­al South­ern house­holds that includes The Texas Chain Saw Massacre.

Spe­cial men­tion should also go to Johannes Roberts’ The Oth­er Side of the Door and Son­ny Mallhi’s Anguish, both of which use the genre frame of ghost­ly pos­ses­sion to limn the trau­mat­ic impact of a child’s death on a family’s make­up, and both of which, in focus­ing on iso­lat­ed moth­ers whose hus­bands are large­ly absent, eas­i­ly pass the Bechdel test. What is more both, impor­tant­ly, show that a fam­i­ly dis­rupt­ed once may well be dis­rupt­ed for­ev­er – which can only be good news when it comes to fuelling the fucked-up fan­tasies of FrightFest’s freak­ish if friend­ly extend­ed family.

You might like