22 July

Review by Hannah Strong @thethirdhan

Directed by

Paul Greengrass


Anders Danielsen Lie Jon Øigarden Øystein Martinsen


Another film about Anders Breivik?


Gratuitous, gaudy, grim.

In Retrospect.

What does Greengrass hope to achieve with a film like this?

Paul Greengrass shows the action and aftermath of the 2011 Norway attacks in his latest terrorism-driven drama.

Perhaps it’s just a case of poor timing that means we’ve received two feature films about Anders Breivik’s attack on Oslo and Utøya within the same year. These things do have a habit of coming in pairs – the summer of 2006 saw the release of Oliver Stone’s World Trade Center and Paul Greengrass’ United 93, both focusing on the events of 9/11. This autumn sees Erik Poppe’s U-July 22 and Greengrass’ 22 July both deal with the devastating slaughter of 77 people (primarily teenagers) at the hands of a far-right extremist.

Opening on the morning of 22 July, 2011, Greengrass focuses in on three individuals: teenager Viljar Hanssen (Jonas Strand Gravli), Norwegian Prime Minister Jens Stoltenberg (Ola G Furuseth) and Breivik himself (Anders Danielsen Lie). After showing Breivik carrying out the bomb attack on Oslo’s parliament building, the film continues to the social youth summer camp on Utøya Island. A harrowing sequence depicts Breivik hunting down and killing 69 teenagers, before showing the aftermath, in which Breivik stands trial and Viljar attempts to recover from the trauma he sustained on the day, both physical and mental.

The difficulty about making a film about recent traumatic incidents – particularly those that occurred in the Western world – comes in the fact it’s hard to tell audiences anything not gleaned from the news cycle. We’re exposed to shocking images, we see victims tearfully recounting details of their trauma on the witness stand. In the case of Breivik, his trial was widely covered by the media, and he did not shy away from making his intentions known. Greengrass’ film fails to really tell us anything new about the devastating impact of the Oslo and Utøya attack, and in splitting his film between three stories, never manages to really find a particularly compelling angle.

Although Strand Gravli gives a committed performance as teenage victim Viljar, his story of rehabilitation feels overfamiliar (bringing to mind David Gordon Green’s Stronger). It feels entirely inappropriate to juxtapose this with a narrative thread following Brevick’s imprisonment, particularly since he is unrepentant about his actions and steadfast in his abhorrent political beliefs. Greengrass clearly doesn’t want his audience to feel sympathy for Breivik, but what does it achieve in recreating his likeness, or to show a tearful Viljar confronting him in court?

The primary failure of 22 July is that it takes a three-prong approach to its subject material. Individually the stories are intriguing, particularly that of Geir Lippestad (Jon Øigarden), the defence lawyer assigned to Breivik. Wrestling with his personal feelings and professional duty, as well as the public perception of him (Lippestad’s family start receiving threatening phone calls after the trial begins), Lippestad’s narrative feels the most complex, but too quickly we’re pulled away from him to the concurrent plotlines, as if Greengrass has tried to merge three films into one.

The result feels like emotional battery, designed to evoke distress in its audience without having anything new or interesting to say. Films about recent acts of extreme violence can help us understand and make sense of the difficult world we live in, but 22 July feels like a cynical attempt to package trauma for mass consumption.

Published 10 Oct 2018

Tags: Anders Danielsen Lie Netflix Paul Greengrass


Another film about Anders Breivik?


Gratuitous, gaudy, grim.

In Retrospect.

What does Greengrass hope to achieve with a film like this?

Suggested For You

U-July 22 – first look review

By Hannah Strong

Esteemed Norwegian director Erik Poppe dramatises the real-life mass shooting on the island of Utoya in this problematic thriller.

Jason Bourne

By Manuela Lazic

Matt Damon’s black ops action man returns in a sequel primed for our social media-obsessed times. Uh-oh…



By Charles Bramesco

David Gordon Green teams up with Jake Gyllenhaal to bring us a biopic that’s harder, better, faster...

review LWLies Recommends

Little White Lies Logo

About Little White Lies

Little White Lies was established in 2005 as a bi-monthly print magazine committed to championing great movies and the talented people who make them. Combining cutting-edge design, illustration and journalism, we’ve been described as being “at the vanguard of the independent publishing movement.” Our reviews feature a unique tripartite ranking system that captures the different aspects of the movie-going experience. We believe in Truth & Movies.