Andrea Arnold: ‘I’m very interested in the… | Little White Lies

Interviews

Andrea Arnold: I’m very inter­est­ed in the sen­su­al world’

04 Nov 2024

Words by Nia Childs

A young woman with curly red hair, wearing a red shirt and leather jacket, stands in a city environment with birds flying around her. In the background, buildings and a cow can be seen.
A young woman with curly red hair, wearing a red shirt and leather jacket, stands in a city environment with birds flying around her. In the background, buildings and a cow can be seen.
One of Britain’s fore­most chron­i­clers of life in the eco­nom­ic mar­gins opens up about the pres­sures of mod­ern film­mak­ing and her desire to let audi­ences take what they want from her films.

Andrea Arnold’s sixth fea­ture, Bird, fol­lows Bai­ley (Nykiya Adams) as she nav­i­gates life in a squat in Kent with her father Bug (Bar­ry Keoghan) and her broth­er Hunter (Jason Buda). Her rela­tion­ship with her father is volatile, and her broth­er and his friends are pre­oc­cu­pied with mak­ing and watch­ing YouTube videos of peo­ple get­ting beat­en up. Bai­ley cuts a lone­ly fig­ure, until she meets the mys­te­ri­ous Bird (Franz Rogows­ki) who seems to be the hero that she is look­ing for.

Arnold’s debut fea­ture, Red Road, was released while I was study­ing film at Kent Uni­ver­si­ty in 2006. I was encour­aged by a tutor to sup­port a local film­mak­er” by going to see it at the Gul­benkian Cin­e­ma on cam­pus, and so here began per­haps the most for­ma­tive cin­e­mat­ic rela­tion­ship of my life. I’d been deeply moved by the depth of Kate Dickie’s per­for­mance in that film, how Arnold draws out her yearn­ing and sad­ness. I’ve always had the impres­sion that there’s a real mater­nal kind­ness that Arnold offers her char­ac­ters, a fierce duty of pro­tec­tion and a refusal to place judge­ment on them despite their some­times-anti­so­cial behaviour.

When watch­ing Bird, I found myself won­der­ing if Franz Rogowski’s char­ac­ter was in fact how Arnold saw her­self – an ethe­re­al being who has the wis­dom to know the impor­tance of ten­der­ness where there is chaos, and who embraces the heal­ing qual­i­ties of giv­ing love to oth­ers, despite hav­ing so many unan­swered ques­tions of her own. This idea that kind­ness and love are as sort of super­pow­er may sound trite, but they are essen­tial com­po­nents that are miss­ing in the lives of so many of Arnold’s char­ac­ters; and, of course, in real peo­ple who live in the sorts of worlds that her char­ac­ters inhab­it. I actu­al­ly think there’s some­thing quite rad­i­cal about that.

It’s hard not to feel nos­tal­gic watch­ing the film; whether it be the sound­track full of sur­pris­ing nee­dle drops (Cold­play, The Verve, Blur), a score by Bur­ial whose work notably invokes themes of cross­ing time and space, or its dream­like qual­i­ty, some­thing mag­i­cal that is famil­iar in Arnold’s work but that is cranked up more than ever to deliv­er some­thing of an urban fairy tale. Bird is a film full of the ghosts of Arnold’s past; cer­tain moments that feel like a revis­it­ing of her pre­vi­ous films: a woman stomp­ing along a road push­ing a pram (Wasp); a stone tur­tle orna­ment in a gar­den (Amer­i­can Hon­ey); or some trav­eller boys trot­ting by on hors­es (Fish Tank).

Bird pre­miered this year at the Cannes Film Fes­ti­val, where Arnold was award­ed the Gold­en Coach Award in recog­ni­tion of her work as a direc­tor, and it feels like exact­ly the right moment to pause and reflect on the work of one of the most cel­e­brat­ed British film­mak­ers of her generation.

Two vibrant red parrots in flight, with outstretched wings against a pale background.

It feels strange to be open­ing an inter­view by talk­ing about con­clu­sions. But I real­ly got the sense from watch­ing Bird that it has cul­mi­nat­ed from so many themes and ideas that you explore a lot in your work. What made you go back to Kent where you did Fish Tank? Why this moment in your career?

I nev­er feel that I make that sort of tan­gi­ble choice real­ly. The things that appear just appear, and then I just have to go and dis­cov­er them. The idea for this film came to me a very long time ago, and it was just an image at that point. I had to then go on that jour­ney. And the thing about the film is that it stopped-start­ed a lot because I did oth­er things. I can usu­al­ly tell when some­thing needs me to keep on at it, because it won’t leave me alone, so I can’t drop it. And I find it so fas­ci­nat­ing, because it’s out of my hands – almost like it just kind of nig­gles at me, or sort of keeps on at me until I deal with it.

If you’re some­body who writes or if you’re a painter or a sculp­tor, or if you’re a poet, or some­body who does what­ev­er, you have some artis­tic expres­sion. I think that each work is an explo­ration of your own psy­che on some lev­el, and I think it’s some­thing you don’t under­stand about your­self, or that you haven’t worked out. It’s some­thing that is impor­tant for you to deal with. That’s how it is for me any­way. Every film feels a bit like that. So, in that way, I don’t have a choice. I think some­body like [Robert] Bres­son said that some­times you have an idea for some­thing, and it’s like you’re pulling at a bit of string. And some­times you pull the string, it doesn’t go very far. It just goes there [ges­tures a short dis­tance with hands]. And some­times you pull at a bit of string, and it goes on and on and it unrav­els and unrav­els and doesn’t stop unravelling.

I think that cer­tain ideas that I have, or cer­tain things that come to me, are like that. They just keep on. I keep on. It did seem odd to me that I would go back to some­thing that is set around my child­hood, where I grew up. I don’t know, it just kind of took me there. I think I won’t again, though, actu­al­ly. I think it’s inter­est­ing what you said, because maybe Bird might be some kind of some sort of cul­mi­na­tion of something.

While watch­ing Bird, I noticed so many moments where small inter­ac­tions or cer­tain motifs were sig­nalling to some­thing from your pre­vi­ous films, almost like a ghost from the past. I got the impres­sion you’re think­ing a lot about cin­e­ma, and about how we are con­sum­ing images, maybe how that’s changing.

I don’t feel that our worlds have changed mas­sive­ly with the fact that we are all view­ing so many visu­al, two-dimen­sion­al images. And I think that I def­i­nite­ly incor­po­rat­ed that into the film. I think about it a lot, because I’m very inter­est­ed in the sen­su­al world, the world that we can see and feel and touch and hear and smell as I feel our lives are becom­ing increas­ing­ly two dimen­sion­al through images. And I know that’s what film is as well. I’m always a lit­tle bit frus­trat­ed with film in that [sense]. I always wish you could touch it and feel it and smell it. And maybe that’s the future, who knows? Or maybe that’s the­atre… I don’t know.

But I do feel there’s a lim­i­ta­tion to what we under­stand about the world through the two-dimen­sion­al image. A lot of us are con­sum­ing the world in this way, with­out real­ly get­ting out there and expe­ri­enc­ing it. You know, we are all now con­sum­ing the world through the screen. And my younger friends, or chil­dren of my friends, tell me that they don’t go out any­more very much. They do every­thing on their social media. They hard­ly meet up. That’s because they feel they can con­trol the way they look, the way they are, the way they come across, the way they present themselves.

I’ve got that sort of curios­i­ty about all that going on all the time. And when I start­ed to make Bird, I didn’t real­ly have so much. I had Bai­ley film­ing things, because I realised that for a teenag­er like Bai­ley, how do I show her emo­tion­al inte­ri­or? How do I show what she might be feel­ing? I do real­ly believe in cin­e­ma, and that how you put images togeth­er can man­age to con­vey someone’s inte­ri­or self. But I also thought it’s kind of inter­est­ing that she expe­ri­ences the world through her phone, through these images, and that says a lot about what’s going on with her. So, in the very begin­ning, when we start­ed, I realised that was quite a pow­er­ful thing, and so I start­ed film­ing more with the phone.

Two red and black birds with outstretched wings in flight.

Youth and youth cul­ture is some­thing that you come to time and time again. What we often see pre­sent­ed is a young per­son who wants to grow up. They always want to get away, to be an adult. Bai­ley feels dif­fer­ent, in that her wom­an­hood is being thrust upon her in a way that she maybe doesn’t want.

What I find real­ly inter­est­ing is when I’ve writ­ten some­thing, and I’ve got cer­tain ideas about how I want it to be, I then go on a jour­ney with the mak­ing of it. The inter­est­ing jug­gling act you have to do is when you bring togeth­er all the ele­ments. such as the loca­tions or the peo­ple. (and) they all then bring some­thing dif­fer­ent or new or some­thing per­haps you weren’t expect­ing or weren’t plan­ning on. I know some direc­tors, they’ll have an idea in their mind, and they go out to get (it) exact­ly, they’ll want exact­ly what they had in their mind. And they will go off and try to do that. Where­as I always like to write a script, and although I have an emo­tion­al place I want to reach with­in that, I’ll look for peo­ple that I just feel fas­ci­nat­ed by, and Nykiya was one of those people. 

The char­ac­ter writ­ten was more of a jok­er, a bit more expres­sive and out there’. And Nykiya wasn’t real­ly like that. She was a bit more… I wouldn’t say reserved, but she was just a dif­fer­ent kind of girl. It’s fun­ny, this thing about when you’re cast­ing, because some peo­ple just rouse your life force or some­thing, you sort of… come alive when you meet them. And she did that when she came in the room. I was like, Oh!’ I sat up, you know, and there was some­thing about her very being, when she walked in the room. I just felt very curi­ous. The main rea­son I cast (her) was because of that feel­ing I had that I can’t put into words or explain, but (she) was dif­fer­ent to what was writ­ten. So then I had to find anoth­er way of express­ing this char­ac­ter which wasn’t quite what I’d writ­ten in the script. But the resis­tance was always there, the defi­ance – all that was always in the script, the world around her being chaot­ic. How do you nav­i­gate when you’re in the world where every­thing around you is so com­plete­ly chaot­ic? How do you do that?

I’d like to talk about Bar­ry Keoghan who plays Bug. In many ways he’s quite a men­ac­ing char­ac­ter, but there’s also a part of him that’s very child­like, and very sweet. You seem to be very com­fort­able with these men that have this hyper-mas­cu­line qual­i­ty, but who are search­ing for the com­pli­ca­tion inside themselves.

I met Bar­ry at some Hal­loween thing. I’d seen him in some oth­er things, only small things. And then The Ban­shees of Inish­erin came out. I just absolute­ly loved it. I just loved him straight away. You just go, Yeah, that feels total­ly right. He feels right.’ I feel if you cast some­body that feels very close to what you’ve writ­ten, there’s lots of work to do, but every­thing kind of falls into place, you know, in a very nat­ur­al way. You’re not try­ing to make some­thing that doesn’t exist, he just fell into that role very eas­i­ly. And he is not that per­son, but he knows how to be (that per­son). What I love about him as well – which is what I love about a lot of the actors I work with – he’s nev­er the same twice, he’s very much alive. Even though you’ve got a script, you’re hop­ing for them to find the life there. He brings the life to those moments.

He’s the antithe­sis to the char­ac­ter of Bird, who is so dif­fer­ent to a lot of the men that we’re used to see­ing in your films. I felt that what the film was say­ing – and what I felt Bird was try­ing to say – is that in the lives that these peo­ple live, actu­al­ly the only thing you real­ly need is basic kind­ness. I found that real­ly mov­ing, because a lot of what the char­ac­ters are lack­ing in Bird is any­one show­ing them that kind­ness. And he’s just this pure hero for doing that.

I feel like his char­ac­ter is there for you to find. It’s real­ly hard talk­ing about your work, because the whole point of mak­ing a film is to leave ques­tion marks, and not dot the i’s and cross the t’s. It’s to give some­thing for the audi­ence to put them­selves into and to have their own expe­ri­ence with. It’s hard not to give the things away that you feel are secrets. They’re like lit­tle sort of things you put in there that you want peo­ple to dis­cov­er and have their own rela­tion­ship with. So I hate to sort of explain it, you know. I don’t want to explain it. Some­times I don’t under­stand myself any­way, you know, like when I start­ed with his char­ac­ter, I wasn’t even sure what he was going to be, or how he was, or what it was. And then by going on the jour­ney, I found my own ver­sion of him. And I’ve got lots of feel­ings about Bird, but they’re mine. I know that peo­ple inter­pret the film in lots of ways, and I like to leave it that way. I feel like they’re (the char­ac­ters), they’re the meati­ness of the film. Any­thing you make, you want to leave things for peo­ple to dis­cov­er, and debate in the pub after­wards like, What did that mean?’ I think I had the same thing with Cow, and that got read by so many peo­ple like a big fem­i­nist thing, and all about slav­ery, or about the lack of con­trol over your body, and I found that absolute­ly fas­ci­nat­ing. So that’s one of the chal­lenges, to try and not say why. I also think it takes away from peo­ple when they go and see it.

When do you have that feel­ing that a film isn’t yours any­more? I think that must be so hard; I can tell you how I’ve read your film, but you might not have felt that way, and you sort of need to let that go.

I’m hap­py to put it out in the world. You know, I nev­er watch my films again after they play, nev­er. You put it into the world, then every­one has a rela­tion­ship with it, or not, or what­ev­er. And that feels very much like it’s its own thing now – it’s out there. I don’t want to watch it ever again. Every now and again, occa­sion­al­ly peo­ple will show me.

When was the last time?

When I was in Cannes this year and I got this Gold­en Coach award, they put togeth­er fan­tas­tic lit­tle clips, a selec­tion of things from my films. And I found it so mov­ing to see. They did it very beau­ti­ful­ly as well, they picked all my favourite things with­out me even know­ing, because they’re direc­tors and they know. And I sit there and I’m watch­ing this com­pi­la­tion of my work, and I haven’t watched some of it for years, and I found it so mov­ing. It’s like watch­ing my past flash before my eyes. And I got real­ly emo­tion­al, because it was such a beau­ti­ful thing that they gave to me. So, in that way, that was kind of nice, but I wouldn’t want to do it every day.

You might like

Accessibility Settings

Text

Applies the Open Dyslexic font, designed to improve readability for individuals with dyslexia.

Applies a more readable font throughout the website, improving readability.

Underlines links throughout the website, making them easier to distinguish.

Adjusts the font size for improved readability.

Visuals

Reduces animations and disables autoplaying videos across the website, reducing distractions and improving focus.

Reduces the colour saturation throughout the website to create a more soothing visual experience.

Increases the contrast of elements on the website, making text and interface elements easier to distinguish.