How capitalism breeds blue-collar burnout in Thief | Little White Lies

In Praise Of

How cap­i­tal­ism breeds blue-col­lar burnout in Thief

27 Mar 2021

Words by Blaise Radley

Man wearing sunglasses in dark setting
Man wearing sunglasses in dark setting
In Michael Mann’s scorch­ing debut, James Caan chas­es a dream he knows he can nev­er achieve.

Ten min­utes before the end of Thief, Frank (James Caan), the tit­u­lar safe­crack­er extra­or­di­naire, leaves his new fam­i­ly home on the out­skirts of Chica­go and dri­ves away – but the cam­era lingers on the house. Sec­onds lat­er it’s reduced to a smoul­der­ing heap, torn apart by two rag­ing fireballs.

At this point, Frank’s luck has long since run out. What was sup­posed to be one big score for Chica­go crime boss Leo (Robert Prosky) has turned into ongo­ing employ­ment. With one friend already dead, Frank’s new wife Jessie (Tues­day Weld) and their adopt­ed son are now under threat. But it wasn’t Leo that rigged those charges. No, Frank set those explo­sives him­self – the same explo­sives he uses to blow up his down­town dive bar, before torch­ing every last motor at his used car deal­er­ship. As an ex-con­vict fac­ing a return to enforced servi­tude, Frank instead razes his entire life to the ground. Or rather, his life as cap­i­tal­ism has defined it.

In his 1981 debut nar­ra­tive fea­ture, direc­tor Michael Mann scru­ti­nis­es the Amer­i­can Dream as it is sold to blue-col­lar work­ers. Played with an apa­thet­ic swag­ger by James Caan, Frank is the log­i­cal end point of a cap­i­tal­ist soci­ety that exploits man­u­al labour­ers, sell­ing them a white pick­et-fence fan­ta­sy they’re ulti­mate­ly exclud­ed from. It’s telling that the anni­hi­la­tion of the house’s pic­ture-per­fect façade is the film’s cli­mac­tic sequence, Mann shoot­ing each cathar­tic explo­sion from mul­ti­ple angles.

Pri­or to the events of the film, Frank was incar­cer­at­ed for pet­ty theft – sen­tenced to two years but serv­ing 11, trapped in a cycle of vio­lence per­pe­trat­ed by the guards. Worse than that, he was fed a boot­strap-pulling nar­ra­tive: that if he worked hard enough on the out­side, he’d make enough mon­ey to make up for lost time. Mann frames this log­ic as intense­ly trag­ic; the bel­liger­ent crook try­ing to steal sand back from the hourglass.

Mann shoots the Windy City as Frank expe­ri­ences it: dingy blues clubs, neon-stripped liquor stores and rain-soaked streets. He may own two respectable” work­ing class busi­ness­es, but he works most­ly at night – typ­i­cal­ly deemed a sign of crim­i­nal­i­ty or unso­cia­ble fac­to­ry work. At each stage, Mann ties Frank’s crim­i­nal process back to blue-col­lar man­u­fac­tur­ing, lux­u­ri­at­ing in the nuts and bolts mechan­ics of Frank’s moon­lit rob­beries by hold­ing on tight close-ups of bor­ing drills and shorn rounds of met­al from the vault door. Frank might not be steal­ing from the rich to give to the poor, but there’s shades of Robin Hood about the way he seizes the means of production.

Cars parked at a drive-in cinema with glowing lights overhead, a person silhouetted against a bonfire.

Like­wise, all of Frank’s crim­i­nal col­leagues have a back­ground in man­u­al labour, from elec­tri­cian Bar­ry (Jim Belushi) to men­tor Okla (played by work­ing-class coun­try music icon Willie Nel­son). When Frank needs sophis­ti­cat­ed safe­crack­ing equip­ment for the big heist, he doesn’t turn to a hi-tech lab­o­ra­to­ry à la James Bond – he goes to a met­al­work­ing fac­to­ry, where the faces and hands are the same dusky blue as the over­alls and the machin­ery, and the lone white suit is sin­gled out for mockery.

Things start to go south when Frank is drawn in by the promise of steady employ­ment and easy mon­ey. Intro­duc­ing him­self as The Bank”, Leo is the embod­i­ment of America’s cap­i­tal­ist ills: glut­to­nous, rapa­cious, and with no moral code to speak of. He gives Frank a nice, clean heist and finds him an off-the-books adop­tive son. But once you’re part of the sys­tem, you have to play by the rules; some­thing Leo reminds Frank of with increas­ing venom.

Mann per­son­i­fies these rules quite lit­er­al­ly though the police. Much like the guards Frank faced in prison, the offi­cers in Thief are cor­rupt to the core, shak­ing him down for their 10 points”. They bug his house and his car, and before Frank knows it he’s impris­oned again – work­ing to line some­one else’s wal­let and fac­ing beat­ings if he falls out of line. His response when Leo asks why he doesn’t abide is prac­ti­cal­ly Marx­ist: I can see my mon­ey is still in your pock­et, which is from the yield of my labour.”

Ear­li­er, Mann has Frank and Jessie hash out their roman­tic prospects in that most true-blue of set­tings, the Amer­i­can din­er. Frank lays out his past, his philoso­phies and, most can­did­ly, his desires, visu­alised in a dream board col­lage assem­bled from news­pa­per clip­pings. That sim­ple card, with its cob­bled-togeth­er vision of a hap­py fam­i­ly, was fun­da­men­tal­ly mis-sold. Lat­er, as Frank spurns Jessie pri­or to blow­ing their house sky high, he can’t explain him­self prop­er­ly. It’s not what was sup­posed to be,” he says sim­ply, palm­ing her off with the last of his cash. It’s not what was sup­posed to be.”

Buried in that bemused dec­la­ra­tion is the real­i­sa­tion that this ide­alised life hasn’t been lost – it was nev­er attain­able in the first place. When it comes time for Frank to burn it all down – free­ing him­self from Leo and the bonds of cap­i­tal­ism – Mann uses the glow of the flam­ing cars to illu­mi­nate a scrunched-up card Frank has dis­card­ed from his wal­let. With­out the mean­ing afford­ed to it by Frank, it’s just trash, bare­ly dis­tin­guish­able from any oth­er scrap of paper. Anoth­er lost dream for the blue-col­lar work­er, turned to kin­dling for the fire.

You might like