In defence of Rollerball – the capitalist satire… | Little White Lies

In Praise Of

In defence of Roller­ball – the cap­i­tal­ist satire come good

04 Mar 2017

Words by Nadine Smith

Three firefighters in red helmets and protective gear, one holding a breathing apparatus.
Three firefighters in red helmets and protective gear, one holding a breathing apparatus.
John McTiernan’s maligned 2002 remake is one of the sharp­er anti-cap­i­tal­ist films of mod­ern times.

Few direc­tors have con­tributed as much to the canon of Amer­i­can mus­cle cin­e­ma as John McTier­nan, the force of nature behind such mas­ter­works as Die Hard and Preda­tor. But no mat­ter how great an artist’s track record is, there will invari­ably be the occa­sion­al dud. In McTiernan’s case, that is wide­ly con­sid­ered to be Roller­ball, his ill-fat­ed 2002 remake of Nor­man Jewison’s 1975 film of the same name.

Not only was Roller­ball a crit­i­cal non-starter and mas­sive com­mer­cial flop, it’s also the film that sent McTier­nan to prison: in 2013, he was incar­cer­at­ed for lying to an FBI inves­ti­ga­tor about hir­ing a pri­vate detec­tive to wire­tap Roller­ball pro­duc­er Charles Roven, with whom he’d had dis­agree­ments about the film’s direction.

Roller­ball has few staunch defend­ers and is hope­less­ly tied to the era in which it was made, but while it is easy to dis­miss the film is not with­out mer­it. McTier­nan may seem like a polit­i­cal­ly shal­low film­mak­er – even though there are under­cur­rents of ner­vous­ness about impe­ri­al­ism and glob­al­i­sa­tion in both Die Hard and Preda­tor – but Roller­ball deserves con­sid­er­a­tion as a sly polemic against cap­i­tal­ism, one that uses a fic­tion­al form of sports enter­tain­ment to stand up to oppres­sive eco­nom­ic systems.

Not that it meets the typ­i­cal require­ments for anti-cap­i­tal­ist film­mak­ing: it’s loud, with a non-stop nu-met­al sound­track and a brash visu­al style, and crass­ly com­mer­cial, with celebri­ty cameos from every­one from P!nk to Slip­knot. The orig­i­nal screen­play alleged­ly retained more of the original’s sharp social com­men­tary, which McTier­nan dulled in favour of more Roller­ball sequences. But by push­ing polit­i­cal and social con­tent to the mar­gins, McTier­nan actu­al­ly makes a more effec­tive direc­to­r­i­al state­ment, not so much about the alleged evils of the sports enter­tain­ment indus­try or the preva­lence of vio­lence in media, but about cap­i­tal­ism itself.

Roller­ball is set in a con­tem­po­rary dystopia that is much clos­er to our own than that of the future-set 1975 film, a place where the lega­cies of crum­bled regimes are still felt. The sto­ry fol­lows Jonathan Cross (Chris Klein), the poster boy for Roller­ball, a vicious team sport played in Cen­tral Asia and broad­cast across the world. We nev­er quite learn the rules of Roller­ball – the film’s Greek cho­rus by way of sports broad­cast­er (played by WWE icon Paul Hey­man) informs us that the rules are very Russ­ian and com­pli­cat­ed” – but it’s clear that cor­po­rate spon­sors dic­tate the game more than match offi­cials, and Jonathan soon learns that blood dri­ves up rat­ings bet­ter than any­thing else.

The league’s own­er, Alexi Petro­vich (Jean Reno), a for­mer KGB agent with sig­nif­i­cant polit­i­cal sway through­out Cen­tral Asia, has set up cer­tain play­ers for vio­lent down­falls in order to dri­ve up view­er­ship and fuel the gam­bling cir­cuit. Thanks to Roller­ball, so-called Atlantic City syn­drome” has tak­en hold of Eura­sia, and a region already strug­gling to find its eco­nom­ic legs after the col­lapse of the Sovi­et Union is dri­ven fur­ther into ruin.

The play­ers of Roller­ball are divid­ed into class­es: the head­lin­ers, who have devot­ed fan fol­low­ings and live a pam­pered life, and the team play­ers, many of whom are from Cen­tral Asia and fight for peanuts.” Jonathan and the oth­er Roller­ball poster boys care lit­tle about the sit­u­a­tion of the coun­tries they com­pete in, which have been turned into play­grounds for their own plea­sure; though Jonathan wit­ness­es riots over worker’s rights, he’s con­tent to speed down the emp­ty free­ways in his sport car. But for the ordi­nary team play­ers, Roller­ball is a job per­formed under threat, as Alexi has been known to dis­ap­pear” the fam­i­lies of rogue roller-skaters.

As a sign of their servi­tude, play­ers have their team num­bers tat­tooed on their faces, a mark that the more priv­i­leged Jonathan and Mar­cus (LL Cool J) forego. Alexi, an ex-com­mu­nist who has tak­en nice­ly to the oppor­tu­ni­ties for exploita­tion afford­ed by cap­i­tal­ism, has pit the two groups against each oth­er to dis­tract from his own tyran­ni­cal reign, not just over the Roller­ball cir­cuit, but over a grow­ing swath of ter­ri­to­ry and indus­try in the Eurasian region.

Through­out the film char­ac­ters observe that they lack own­er­ship over their own bod­ies. Mar­cus says that Jonathan is Alexi’s boy” and com­pares their sta­tus to that of ele­phants in a cir­cus. In a mono­logue just before the final show­down between Jonathan and his cor­rupt taskmas­ters, Alexi makes this same point: he has no need to hold polit­i­cal office or run busi­ness­es if he owns the men who do. Here­in lies the film’s true mes­sage about cap­i­tal­ism: it is not the accu­mu­la­tion and pro­duc­tion of goods that makes a cap­i­tal­ist pow­er­ful, but the com­mod­i­fi­ca­tion and own­er­ship of bod­ies. If you con­trol human beings, you con­trol everything.

In the film’s final moments, we see the pen­ny drop not only for the Roller­ballers but the view­ing pub­lic too, as both groups col­lec­tive­ly rise up against their exploiters. For Jonathan, this means strik­ing back against Alexi and his cronies. For those inspired by Jonathan, it means going out into the streets and build­ing new sys­tems and ways of being in the wake of old, oppres­sive ones.

You might like