Why Barefoot in the Park is the perfect example… | Little White Lies

In Praise Of

Why Bare­foot in the Park is the per­fect exam­ple of on-screen chemistry

02 Oct 2017

Words by Louise Busfield

Two people conversing indoors, a man and a woman, both wearing winter clothing.
Two people conversing indoors, a man and a woman, both wearing winter clothing.
Robert Red­ford and Jane Fon­da play young new­ly­weds to uplift­ing effect in this light­heart­ed comedy.

On-screen chem­istry: you either have it or you don’t. Either way it’s an impor­tant fac­tor in any movie romance. Emma Stone and Ryan Gosling had it in Crazy, Stu­pid Love, as did Katharine Hep­burn and Cary Grant in Bring­ing Up Baby, but it’s Jane Fon­da and Robert Red­ford in Gene Saks 1967 film Bare­foot in the Park who real­ly stand out from the pack.

Fresh from get­ting mar­ried, we meet Corie (Jane Fon­da) and Paul Brat­ter (Robert Red­ford) kiss­ing while sat in the back of a horse-drawn car­riage on their way to The Plaza Hotel in New York City. It’s the open­ing scene of the film and the pair are instant­ly believ­able as a cou­ple who are head-over-heels in love. They are so infat­u­at­ed with one anoth­er that they don’t even realise they’ve reached their des­ti­na­tion. It is then that a bar­rage quick comedic wit com­mences, with the two ban­ter­ing back and forth in between kisses.

But it is when the cou­ple check into the hotel that their on-screen flir­ta­tion attains peak ten­der­ness. The concierge asks: “…and will Mrs Brat­ter be stay­ing with you?” Tem­porar­i­ly for­get­ting they are now hus­band and wife Paul replies: My Moth­er?” Real­is­ing what he’s said Paul affec­tion­ate­ly bumps Corie’s head with his and laughs. The action appears so real and so dot­ing it’s hard to believe that the two are are just acting.

It would seem that there may have actu­al­ly been some real­i­ty to the infat­u­a­tion, par­tic­u­lar­ly on Fonda’s part. As she told Ellen DeGeneres: I realise that I’ve grown up, because in the three pre­vi­ous movies, I was always in love with him. The only prob­lem with work­ing with Bob is that I just look into his… I kind of fall into his eyes and for­get my dia­logue. God, so good looking.”

This sense of ado­ra­tion is mir­rored in the duo’s fourth film togeth­er, Our Souls At Night. In one scene, the cou­ple Addie and Louis are shown sit­ting in a car while Louis dri­ves. Slow­ly, Addie scoots her way clos­er to Louis and ten­der­ly places her head on his shoul­der. Louis’ facial expres­sions as he sneaks a few glances at Addie while dri­ving, and her besot­ted looks back at him, prove that the mag­ic remains between Fon­da and Redford.

What’s spe­cial about Bare­foot in the Park is that it draws togeth­er two very dif­fer­ent per­son­al­i­ty types. The viva­cious and adven­tur­ous Corie and the con­ser­v­a­tive and dig­ni­fied Paul. Almost echo­ing this is the rela­tion­ship that forms between Corie’s moth­er Ethel (Mil­dred Natwick) and the couple’s neigh­bour Mr Vic­tor Velas­co (Charles Boy­er). The film is about the strug­gles and sac­ri­fices of mar­ried life. It looks at these polar oppo­sites and asks the ques­tion: can love real­ly con­quer all? If the nat­ur­al affec­tion between Fon­da and Red­ford didn’t exist, would the film have endured the way it has? They are so adorable togeth­er and their love is so con­vinc­ing, so the film is a tri­umph. You’re made to care for the char­ac­ters and you will them to work out their problems.

Based on a play of the same name, the film was large­ly shot with­in the inti­mate con­fines of a sin­gle small room. This fac­tor is sig­nif­i­cant to the com­e­dy aspect of the film, and reflects the close­ness we feel for the pro­tag­o­nists. Direc­tor Saks makes excep­tion­al use of the space, using it to accom­plish some of film’s most hilar­i­ous moments. Five flights up (with a stoop, count­ed or not count­ed depend­ing on your per­son­al­i­ty), a hole in the sky­light, no bath­tub, no heat­ing and a bed­room the size of a clos­et, it’s no won­der the sar­cas­tic one-lin­ers fly high. These prob­lems, com­bined with the couple’s con­trast­ing per­son­al­i­ties, become the ulti­mate test for their mar­riage. It is fas­ci­nat­ing to observe how these char­ac­ters change through­out the film, slow­ly real­is­ing that to make things work they have to rec­on­cile their differences.

In the clos­ing scenes we see Paul get­ting lousy’ drunk while walk­ing bare­foot in Wash­ing­ton Square park. It’s a response to Corie’s repeat­ed com­plaints about his sober and square demeanour. After Corie gets him home, Paul walks up onto the sky­light, copy­ing his odd­ball neigh­bour Mr Velas­co who uses the roof to access his apart­ment above.

In an attempt to emu­late some of Velasco’s adven­tur­ous qual­i­ties that Corie adores so much, a com­plete­ly sloshed Paul slips and near­ly falls. This in turn draws the cou­ple back to one anoth­er – a brush with death helps to nur­ture the sense of romance and belong­ing fur­ther and deep­er. The moment is dra­mat­ic, but also very fun­ny and sur­pris­ing­ly sen­ti­men­tal. It serves as a final cat­a­lyst to knock some sense into the cou­ple. It proves that while mar­riage is hard work, some­times, it’s worth it.

You might like

Accessibility Settings

Text

Applies the Open Dyslexic font, designed to improve readability for individuals with dyslexia.

Applies a more readable font throughout the website, improving readability.

Underlines links throughout the website, making them easier to distinguish.

Adjusts the font size for improved readability.

Visuals

Reduces animations and disables autoplaying videos across the website, reducing distractions and improving focus.

Reduces the colour saturation throughout the website to create a more soothing visual experience.

Increases the contrast of elements on the website, making text and interface elements easier to distinguish.