The Tragedy of Macbeth – first-look review | Little White Lies

Festivals

The Tragedy of Mac­beth – first-look review

25 Sep 2021

Words by Charles Bramesco

Two silhouetted figures embracing, in close intimate contact, black and white image.
Two silhouetted figures embracing, in close intimate contact, black and white image.
Some­thing Coen this way comes… Den­zel Wash­ing­ton and Frances McDor­mand star in this inno­v­a­tive take on the Bard.

Homage has always been the lin­gua fran­ca of the Coen broth­ers, and though Joel and Ethan have part­ed ways with prospects of anoth­er joint fea­ture look­ing dim, that much hasn’t changed. Their films append scare quotes to hide­bound Amer­i­can gen­res like the west­ern, screw­ball com­e­dy, noir, or musi­cal, a prac­tice that Joel applies to the con­cept of the filmed play through less overt and less iron­ic means in his solo direc­to­r­i­al debut.

His mag­nif­i­cent­ly mount­ed The Tragedy of Mac­beth finds a fresh angle on an Eng­lish 101 sta­ple by peer­ing into the past for aes­thet­ic cues and tap­ping into its lin­eage of gor­geous arti­fice. As the direc­tor admit­ted in a Q&A ses­sion fol­low­ing the pre­mière at the New York Film Fes­ti­val, he drew inspi­ra­tion from Orson Welles, pre­sum­ably mean­ing both his 1948 screen adap­ta­tion as well as his ear­li­er all-Black stage pro­duc­tion dubbed Voodoo Macbeth.

The ground­break­ing lat­ter work must nec­es­sar­i­ly be in con­ver­sa­tion with the first motion pic­ture to cast an African-Amer­i­can per­former as the Thane of Caw­dor, but Welles’ influ­ence can be felt most per­cep­ti­bly in the pro­duc­tion design that evokes a rich the­atri­cal lega­cy through its graphite-coloured sparse­ness and containment.

The stark black-and-white pho­tog­ra­phy and boxy Acad­e­my ratio fos­ter an aura of the old world. Not the medieval era in which Mac­beth (Den­zel Wash­ing­ton, at the height of his pow­ers) jock­eyed for the throne of Scot­land, how­ev­er, instead trans­port­ing us to the first half of the 20th cen­tu­ry, when the mem­brane between Tin­sel­town and the most high­brow halls of Broad­way was more porous and per­mis­sive. Coen eschewed loca­tion shoot­ing for the most breath­tak­ing sound­stage sets since Allied, anoth­er for­mal nod to clas­si­cal Hol­ly­wood cin­e­ma, in order to sim­u­late the raw­ness of the the­atre with­out get­ting penned in by the shape of the proscenium.

While his script remains faith­ful to the text, Frances McDor­mand finds new shades of defi­ance in Lady Mac­beth and Kathryn Hunter’s gur­gling inter­pre­ta­tion of the Weird Sis­ters sug­gests that Gol­lum might be their broth­er. In a role done so many times that its dia­logue has begun to sound like incan­ta­tion, Wash­ing­ton rein­vig­o­rates the appre­hen­sion and even­tu­al pow­er-hunger of Big Mac with unex­pect­ed read­ings, under­play­ing big moments and loos­ing his full grav­i­tas in qui­eter scenes. He prac­ti­cal­ly toss­es off the tomor­row and tomor­row” solil­o­quy, and it works because by that point, he’s already demon­strat­ed how much he’s hold­ing in.

The cre­ative depar­tures – the word revi­sion­ist’ has no place here, Coen’s his­tor­i­cal rev­er­ence every bit as dis­tinct as the trans­posed milieu the term usu­al­ly con­notes — come through in the spar­tan sets and how cin­e­matog­ra­ph­er Bruno Del­bon­nel shoots them. Indoors, Coen gives his cast lit­tle more to work with than walls and large stone blocks swathed in frame-whiten­ing fog; a cli­mac­tic con­flict takes place in a cramped rock cor­ri­dor, and the cin­e­mat­ic medi­um affords us the added ben­e­fit of a bird’s‑eye view. The faux-out­doors will daz­zle any­one with an attach­ment to the look of ear­ly stu­dio releas­es, the fake trees and ground and sky a direct link to a life­time of nos­tal­gia. (Join­ing Leos Carax’s sim­i­lar­ly stage-mind­ed Annette, Coen also named FW Murnau’s Sun­rise as a ref­er­ence point.)

When paired with a sto­ry so set­tled in cen­turies of enshrine­ment, the metic­u­lous­ness of Coen’s craft can some­times slip into for­mal­ism for its own sake, as if Shakespeare’s words func­tion as scaf­fold­ing on which to hang the painter­ly com­po­si­tions. Dur­ing what we may have to sad­ly refer to as the broth­ers era,” their typ­i­cal project would be packed with com­men­tary, sym­bol­ism, and philo­soph­i­cal tan­gents. How­ev­er ele­vat­ed by style, this one is what it is, its nar­ra­tive self-evi­dent and unaltered.

Even if the dry wit and cher­ryp­ick­able allu­sions may be absent, the tech­ni­cal vir­tu­os­i­ty on dis­play marks this as the work of a mas­ter. Vis­cer­al, haunt­ed and severe, Coen’s vision coax­es out not just the inten­si­ty in the play – every grit­ty” take has done this, from Roman Polan­s­ki to Justin Kurzel – but its old­er ren­der­ings too. New­ly sin­gle, he’s in the process of redis­cov­er­ing what it means to make a film his own. And that won’t stop him from mak­ing em like they used to.

You might like