El Conde – first-look review | Little White Lies

Festivals

El Conde – first-look review

31 Aug 2023

Words by Hannah Strong

Man in fur-lined coat and naval cap, black and white image.
Man in fur-lined coat and naval cap, black and white image.
Pablo Lar­raín imag­ines Augus­to Pinochet as an aged vam­pire crav­ing death in his goth­ic satire, which marks his first for­ay into horror.

The shad­ow of Augus­to Pinochet looms large in Chile. The dic­ta­tor has now been dead for as long as he ruled the coun­try, but his lega­cy informs every aspect of Chilean cul­ture – a fact that film­mak­er Pablo Lar­raín (him­self the son of two politi­cians) has explored through­out his career, most explic­it­ly in his tril­o­gy of Tony Manero (2008), Post Mortem (2010) and No (2012).

Yet for the past few years, his inter­ests have skewed more West­ern, with heav­i­ly-laud­ed biopics of Jack­ie Kennedy and Princess Diana – though his under­rat­ed reg­gae­ton dra­ma Ema is worth a men­tion too. Still, Lar­raín returns to his home­land for his tenth fea­ture as direc­tor and revis­its Pinochet’s rule in a less-than-sub­tle polit­i­cal satire, which imag­ines the gen­er­al as an immor­tal vampire.

What if, Lar­raín and his co-writer Guiller­mo Calderón pro­pose, Pinochet was not a man, but a mon­ster? Born in France short­ly before the Rev­o­lu­tion of 1789, his per­verse appetites would even­tu­al­ly lead him to South Amer­i­ca, where he would adopt a new name and iden­ti­ty, ris­ing through the ranks to become a dec­o­rat­ed mil­i­tary leader. A rather famil­iar staid British voiceover lov­ing­ly recalls Pinochet’s rise to pow­er – and his sub­se­quent decline. The man’s greed and hubris have led him to fake his own death, and so he hides out on a remote island ranch with his wife Lucía (Glo­ria Münch­mey­er) and devot­ed but­ler Fyo­dor (Larraín’s fre­quent col­lab­o­ra­tor Alfre­do Cas­tro), await­ing the arrival of his five children.

These chil­dren, we are told, are noth­ing more than par­a­sites, feed­ing off the black blood of their father, and their arrival on the island is not out of con­cern but rather fuelled by impa­tience. They are hun­gry for their inher­i­tance, but due to Augus­to and Lucía’s cre­ative account­ing, can’t work out where it is. Mean­while, Car­men­si­ta (Paula Luchsinger) a devot­ed young nun and expert exor­cist, is also dis­patched to the man­sion, tasked with the respon­si­bil­i­ty of dri­ving out the demon that infests Pinochet’s soul. If, that is, there is such a beast. Per­haps Pinochet has no soul at all.

Lar­raín has nev­er been much for sub­tle­ty in his film­mak­ing, par­tic­u­lar­ly in his more recent work, and favours lav­ish iconog­ra­phy that suits the hor­ror genre. Shot in dra­mat­ic black and white (by Ed Lach­man no less) that recalls the likes of Nos­fer­atu and Tod Browning’s Drac­u­la, Lar­raín imag­ines a sham­bling Count (played by Chilean act­ing leg­end Jaime Vadell) holed up in his now decrepit ranch, rem­i­nisc­ing about his glo­ry days.

The affec­tion­ate voiceover lav­ish­es praise on him in a com­i­cal man­ner (the reveal behind the narrator’s con­nec­tion to Pinochet is one of the best gags in the film) while seem­ing­ly blam­ing every­one else in the coun­try for his faults and down­fall. In fact, that ire is par­tic­u­lar­ly present when it comes to women with­in the film, and the misog­y­ny that jumps out doesn’t real­ly suc­ceed as part of the satire. Women – notably Pinochet’s wife – seem to bear the brunt of the blame for Pinochet’s actions and evil, and the film even seems to sug­gest that behind every evil man, there’s an even more cor­rupt woman. While women are cer­tain­ly capa­ble of as much vil­lainy as men, it does some­what con­ve­nient­ly absolve Pinochet to repeat­ed­ly sug­gest he was act­ing at his wife’s whim.

It’s dif­fi­cult to speak to the specifics of El Conde’s gen­der pol­i­tics with­out spoil­ing the film’s third act sur­prise – per­haps Lar­raín and Calderon have a point when it comes to the par­tic­u­lar indi­vid­ual they hold up in par­al­lel to Pinochet, made palat­able to the glob­al pub­lic large­ly due to her gen­der. Nev­er­the­less, there’s a lot that is high­ly enjoy­able about this satire, despite its rather lit­er­al take on the politi­cian as super­nat­ur­al demon.

If any­thing, this allows the likes of Pinochet off the hook in too sim­ple a fash­ion – it’s much eas­i­er to imag­ine the peo­ple who com­mit evil acts are dis­tinct from us in some tan­gi­ble way, rather than as human as any­one else. But it’s hard to deny the styl­ish goth­ic stag­ing of Larraín’s first for­ay into genre cin­e­ma, which com­bines famil­ial melo­dra­ma with blood­shed effort­less­ly, cre­at­ing some­thing between The Tragedy of Mac­beth and Drac­u­la: Dead and Lov­ing It, that is undoubt­ed­ly enter­tain­ing even if its inter­nal pol­i­tics fall a lit­tle short.

You might like