The tragic life and death of Yukio Mishima | Little White Lies

In Praise Of

The trag­ic life and death of Yukio Mishima

25 May 2016

Words by Tom Graham

Intense-looking man wearing headband with Japanese text, shouting with a serious expression.
Intense-looking man wearing headband with Japanese text, shouting with a serious expression.
How Paul Schrad­er rein­ter­pret­ed the fas­ci­nat­ing sto­ry of the revered Japan­ese author.

Yukio Mishi­ma was among Japan’s most cel­e­brat­ed post-war authors. His per­son­al life and his art were fol­lowed by the whole coun­try, right up to 25 Novem­ber, 1970, when he and four of his fol­low­ers entered an army head­quar­ters in Tokyo and took the com­man­der hostage. Mishi­ma demand­ed the gar­ri­son be assem­bled, then stepped out onto the bal­cony. Stand­ing over the crowd, he was the very fig­ure of Japan­ese mas­culin­i­ty, dressed in immac­u­late, fit­ted mil­i­tary wear with the tra­di­tion­al white and red hachi­ma­ki tied around his fore­head. He addressed the sol­diers and tried to start a coup, exhort­ing them to swear their alle­giance to the emper­or and rein­stall a pre­war soci­ety. At first they lis­tened, then they mocked and jeered. Mishi­ma stepped back inside and com­mit­ted sep­puku, thrust­ing a short blade into his bel­ly and yank­ing it from left to right, dis­em­bow­elling himself.

In his biopic Mishi­ma: A Life in Four Chap­ters, Paul Schrad­er found his ide­al sub­ject. Although a suc­cess­ful direc­tor in his own right, Schrad­er is best known for his screen­plays. He wrote Scorsese’s Taxi Dri­ver, in which he explored mas­culin­i­ty in the mod­ern world, and how men riv­en by van­i­ty and inse­cu­ri­ty can snap into vio­lence. The pro­tag­o­nist of that film, Travis Bick­le, is an exis­ten­tial out­sider who finds mean­ing for his life in prepar­ing for a fatal goal. As soon as he sets his mis­sion, his life crys­tallis­es. He nar­rates his trans­for­ma­tion in the drea­ry monot­o­ne of a sociopath. Junk food is out; press-ups are in; he will wash the scum off the streets”. His mis­sion cli­max­es in a shootout far messier and real­er than he had imag­ined. At the end he tries to cap his sto­ry with a bul­let through his head, but the cham­ber clicks empty.

The par­al­lels between Mishi­ma and Bick­le are strik­ing. But Mishi­ma, who was repeat­ed­ly tipped for the Nobel Prize for Lit­er­a­ture, was much more besides. He was a sick­ly child who became a ded­i­cat­ed body­builder. He was an ardent tra­di­tion­al­ist and a bisex­u­al masochist. He was a man of words des­per­ate to be a man of action, and for whom life was but a pre­lude to death. He was by nature intro­spec­tive, and his imag­i­na­tion shaped his real­i­ty just as much as the oppo­site was true. There was a Yukio Mishi­ma, but there was also a sus­tained fic­tion of Yukio Mishi­ma”. Both could have been cre­ations of Paul Schrad­er, but in this instance life was stranger than fiction.

A sub­ject as enig­mat­ic as Mishi­ma could not be fath­omed by a con­ven­tion­al biopic. Know­ing this, Schrad­er chose to inter­weave Mishima’s real­i­ty, mem­o­ry and imag­i­na­tion using three dis­tinct visu­al styles. The first is rel­a­tive­ly ordi­nary, fol­low­ing the events on the day of Mishima’s death. The sec­ond is shot in wist­ful black-and-white, evok­ing the gold­en age of Japan­ese cin­e­ma and delves into Mishima’s past, as record­ed by him­self. The third style is lit­er­al­ly the­atri­cal, shot on a stage with stylised, geo­met­ric sets sus­pend­ed in dark­ness. It is used to depict scenes from Mishima’s writ­ings, and is accom­pa­nied by a soar­ing, celes­tial score by Philip Glass. On paper Schrader’s struc­ture may seem com­plex, but in prac­tice it reveals a per­fect­ly clear thread run­ning through Mishima’s life and art.

What becomes clear is that Mishi­ma was a man whose life and art were indis­tin­guish­able. When he wrote, Mishi­ma wrote from him­self, as per­haps all writ­ers do. He cut sliv­ers of his psy­che and wrote sto­ries around them. Three of Mishima’s nov­els fea­ture in the film. In The Tem­ple of the Gold­en Pavil­ion’ a young acolyte with a stut­ter becomes oppressed by the over­whelm­ing beau­ty of the pavil­ion. After sleep­ing with a pros­ti­tute and los­ing his stut­ter, he burns it to the ground. In Kyoko’s House’, a young, body-build­ing actor signs his body over to a woman to pay his mother’s debt. Their affair becomes increas­ing­ly sado­masochis­tic, until they even­tu­al­ly com­mit sui­cide togeth­er. And in Run­away Hors­es’, a young cadet with a cell of com­rades attempts to purge Japan of its cor­rupt­ing moder­ni­ty. The plan fails, but the cadet man­ages to kill one busi­ness man and earns his sep­puku, his beau­ti­ful death. In one way or anoth­er, all three pre­fig­ure events in Mishima’s life, and help you under­stand what drove him to his death.

Mishima’s sui­cide was the final touch on his great­est work of art: him­self. He was obsessed with the artis­tic pos­si­bil­i­ties of dying young, beau­ti­ful and pure – at his peak. He under­stood that to destroy your­self before you fade is, in a way, to pre­serve your­self: per­fect puri­ty is pos­si­ble if you turn your life into a line of poet­ry writ­ten with a splash of blood.” The bizarre failed coup was notion­al­ly intend­ed to restore a pre­war soci­ety, but was real­ly a the­atri­cal flour­ish to frame the sui­cide he had been plan­ning all his life. It was the apoth­e­o­sis of his work, the moment Yukio Mishi­ma became Yukio Mishi­ma” – a per­fect eclipse: the instant that the blade tore open his flesh, the bright disk of the sun soared up and explod­ed behind his eyelids.”

You might like