Ava DuVernay rallies against criminal injustice… | Little White Lies

Not Movies

Ava DuVer­nay ral­lies against crim­i­nal injus­tice in When They See Us

31 May 2019

Words by Roxanne Sancto

Two people, a man and a woman, sitting together in a classroom setting, with a serious expression on their faces.
Two people, a man and a woman, sitting together in a classroom setting, with a serious expression on their faces.
The director’s drama­ti­sa­tion of the Cen­tral Park jog­ger case is a vital true crime chronicle.

True to her jour­nal­is­tic back­ground – the same that saw her cov­er­ing the OJ Simp­son tri­al for CBS News back in the day – Ava DuVer­nay con­tin­ues to delve deep into America’s Crim­i­nal Jus­tice Sys­tem. Fol­low­ing her 2016 doc­u­men­tary, 13th, which exam­ined the inter­sec­tion of race and mass incar­cer­a­tion in the US, the Net­flix minis­eries When They See Us feels like a nat­ur­al evo­lu­tion of the director’s work, one that is marked by the urgency she feels sur­round­ing the sub­ject of racial dis­par­i­ties, wrong­ful con­vic­tions and the land of the free” being home to 25 per cent of the world’s prison population.

As DuVer­nay explained in an inter­view with Oprah Win­frey, “[In 13th] I want­ed to explore the prison indus­tri­al com­plex – prison as indus­try, prison as busi­ness, peo­ple prof­it­ing off pun­ish­ment. That’s what I thought this whole thing would be about. So, as I was try­ing to explain what was hap­pen­ing now, it became unrea­son­able and incom­plete to try to tell the sto­ry of now, with­out telling the sto­ry of the past.” Hence, in order to get a clear sense of how cas­es such as that of the Cen­tral Park Five con­tin­ue to hap­pen, one must first under­stand the spine around which the Amer­i­can prison sys­tem was formed: name­ly, African-Amer­i­cans and Latinos.

The way that we appeal to vot­ers’ sense of fear and anx­i­ety in our nation runs through black bod­ies,” Khalil Gibran Muham­mad, Har­vard Ken­ny School pro­fes­sor and author of The Con­dem­na­tion of Black­ness: Race, Crime and the Mak­ing of Mod­ern Urban Amer­i­ca’, explains in 13th. When They See Us dri­ves this fact home by pre­sent­ing a sad­ly typ­i­cal case of African-Amer­i­can fam­i­lies being torn apart and young lives for­ev­er destroyed over wrong­ful con­vic­tions that have shaped entire, mar­gin­alised communities.

In Part I’, the boys appre­hend­ed at Cen­tral Park – ini­tial­ly as wit­ness­es – are imme­di­ate­ly referred to as ani­mals” by the police, and it is this racial prej­u­dice that caus­es minor­i­ty par­ents to drill safe­ty tac­tics into their chil­dren, prepar­ing them for prop­er con­duct” in the evi­dent of them com­ing in con­tact with the law. This form of con­duct, how­ev­er, does not guar­an­tee safe­ty; whether you run from the police or throw your hands up in sur­ren­der, as a minor­i­ty fig­ure, your safe­ty in the hands of the law is nev­er cer­tain. It wasn’t in the 60s, not in the 80s, and def­i­nite­ly not today.

A group of people protesting, holding signs saying "Stop racism" and "Justice for us all". The protesters are diverse, with both men and women of different ethnicities participating in the demonstration.

The same focus on minor­i­ty slang” was evi­denced in the Cather­ine Fuller case from 1984, where law offi­cials chose to fab­ri­cate a crim­i­nal gang based on the dis­trict com­mu­ni­ty refer­ring to the H on 8th Crew” dur­ing live musi­cal events. As we learn in When They See Us, the var­i­ous groups of youths who took to Cen­tral Park on the night Trisha Meili was assault­ed and raped used the term wild­ing”, some­thing that can only be described as inno­cent, albeit some­what unruly, teenage fun.

This term was imme­di­ate­ly pounced upon by the head of the DA’s sex crime unit, Lin­da Fairstein (played by Felic­i­ty Hoff­man in the show) and her col­leagues, who were intent on paint­ing an entire­ly crim­i­nal­is­ing and daunt­ing image of what wild­ing” con­sti­tutes. Add to that the merg­ing of the words, ani­mals”, wolf pack” and wild­ing”, and soon the pub­lic had the fod­der need­ed to buy into a nar­ra­tive based on fab­ri­cat­ed state­ments and prej­u­dice rather than sol­id evidence.

In the pre­mière episode, we see law offi­cials try­ing to form a time­line of the crime that places their five main sus­pects on the scene – despite a 45-minute dis­crep­an­cy between the order of events, loca­tions and time­lines. Mean­while, the sus­pects – 14-year-old Kevin Richard­son (Asante Blackk), 15-year-olds Antron McCray (Caleel Har­ris), Yusef Salaam (Chris Chalk) and Ray­mond San­tana (Mar­quis Rodriguez) – are held in cus­tody for 18 hours straight, with­out food, rest and, in the case of Yusef, a legal guardian present. Par­ents arriv­ing at the precinct, such as Antron’s father, Bob­by McCray (Michael K Williams), are sub­tly threat­ened and advised to play along rather than plead their children’s inno­cence. And it is this grue­some, incom­pre­hen­si­ble, emo­tion­al and psy­cho­log­i­cal black­mail, that ends up destroy­ing families.

The minors are repeat­ed­ly made to feel alien­at­ed and crim­i­nalised mere­ly for their racial back­grounds, ter­rorised into a state of fear and final­ly forced into a series of false con­fes­sions, with each of the sus­pects con­firm­ing what offi­cials want to hear: that they were wit­ness to their friends beat­ing and rap­ing Meili. And so, Kevin places Antron at the scene of the crime and vice ver­sa. In a heart­break­ing scene, Bob­by des­per­ate­ly tries to con­vince his son Antron to admit to the crime. He has expe­ri­enced what it means to be a black man in the hands of the law and knows that, the con­clu­sions to cas­es like this typ­i­cal­ly end the same: “[The Police will] lie on us, they’ll lock us up and they will kill us.”

A person wearing a dark jacket sits at a desk, with a hand pointing at them from the side.

Korey Wise (Jhar­rel Jerome) wasn’t even on the list of sus­pects round­ed up by the police, but accom­pa­nied his friend Yusef to the sta­tion, believ­ing his moth­er would have want­ed him to. While his friends are inter­ro­gat­ed, Korey is left to sleep. It’s not until law offi­cials are called out for hav­ing col­lect­ed incon­sis­tent state­ments, that they decide to include Korey in the nar­ra­tive. They achieve this by beat­ing the boy and threat­en­ing to destroy his own life; when his state­ment is final­ly record­ed, he is the one to admit to the rape. Fol­low­ing the tri­al, he is the only one of the five to be tried as an adult.

Con­sist­ing of four episodes, DuVernay’s minis­eries explores the full 13-year time­line of this infa­mous case – from the events sur­round­ing the night of 19 April, 1989, to the first tri­al in August, 1990, to the respec­tive boys’ jour­neys through the prison sys­tem, to the after­math fol­low­ing the con­fes­sion of the real attack­er, Matias Reyes in 2002 – as well as Don­ald Trump’s involve­ment in feed­ing into the wolf pack” image of the boys through a series of full-page ads in pop­u­lar nation­al news­pa­pers: Bring Back The Death Penal­ty. Bring Back Our Police!’

This only fuelled the lynch mob rhetoric and soon despi­ca­ble char­ac­ters such as Pat Buchanan were chim­ing in with their own ideas of jus­tice. Fol­low­ing Trump’s approach to sys­tem­at­ic racism, Buchanan insist­ed that Wise should be hanged in Cen­tral Park”. In his opin­ion, the oth­er boys deserved noth­ing less than to be stripped, horse­whipped, and sent to prison.”

Suc­ceed­ing where The Con­fes­sion Tapes large­ly failed, When They See Us hits hard on a human lev­el, offer­ing an emo­tion­al­ly-charged recon­struc­tion of events, tak­ing us on a painstak­ing jour­ney through the prison sys­tem, and show­ing the wider impact on fam­i­lies and com­mu­ni­ties at large, thanks to an amaz­ing cast of actors and DuVernay’s skilled sto­ry­telling. Cru­cial­ly, the series leaves no room for view­ers to doubt the boys who became known as the Cen­tral Park Five. On the con­trary, it deft­ly expos­es the mis­in­for­ma­tion the pub­lic has been fed for decades, encour­ag­ing us all to ral­ly­ing against a sys­tem that can no longer be con­sid­ered lawful.

You might like