How Nobuhiko Obayashi’s Anti-War Trilogy bridges… | Little White Lies

Home Ents

How Nobuhiko Obayashi’s Anti-War Tril­o­gy bridges gen­er­a­tional trauma

13 Dec 2021

Words by Alicia Haddick

Processional line of individuals in dark clothing walking through a grassy field.
Processional line of individuals in dark clothing walking through a grassy field.
The late Japan­ese direc­tor explores the twin nation­al dis­as­ters of 3.11 and World War Two in an epic series of films.

The last decade of Japan­ese cin­e­ma have been defined by the spec­tre of 3 March, 2011, when 20,000 peo­ple died and hun­dreds of thou­sands more lost their homes fol­low­ing a major earth­quake and tsuna­mi that hit the east coast of Japan. In an attempt to under­stand the dis­as­ter, var­i­ous films have addressed the tragedy either direct­ly or indi­rect­ly, from Hidea­ki Anno’s big-bud­get rein­ter­pre­ta­tion of an icon in Shin Godzil­la, to the qui­eter explo­ration of grief in Ryû­suke Hamaguchi’s Haru­ki Muraka­mi adap­ta­tion Dri­ve My Car.

Nobuhiko Obayashi’s Anti-War Tril­o­gy, a series of films cre­at­ed by the direc­tor best known for the cult hor­ror Hausu, is sim­i­lar­ly impos­si­ble to dis­as­so­ci­ate from the events of that day. To call it an anti-war tril­o­gy may seem an odd choice con­sid­er­ing the direc­tor has explic­it­ly stat­ed I am not mak­ing anti-war films, I just do not like war”. Yet they exist as anti-war films because they attempt to remem­ber the effects of war when its lessons are need­ed now more than ever.

The earth­quake was a reset point for mod­ern Japan, as polit­i­cal pow­er shift­ed to the right amid anger at the government’s response to the dis­as­ter. Attempts to rebuild the imme­di­ate dis­as­ter area pro­voked a nation­al debate on what a 21st-cen­tu­ry Japan should even look like. Mov­ing on from 3.11 required Japan to not only fix the dam­age caused by the earth­quake but rebuild its nation­al char­ac­ter, just as it had after the atom­ic bomb­ings of Hiroshi­ma and Nagasa­ki. It raised the ques­tion: what should Japan learn from past mistakes?

Cloudy sky with yellow taxi, two people standing on field.

Start­ing in 2012 with Cast­ing Blos­soms to the Sky, released just one year after the events of 3.11, and con­tin­u­ing through 2014’s Sev­en Weeks and 2017’s Hana­gata­mi, Obayashi’s Anti-War Tril­o­gy explores the twin dis­as­ters of 3.11 and World War Two through tales of romance, war, joy and death, issu­ing a pow­er­ful rebuke to the pos­si­bil­i­ty of embrac­ing mil­i­tan­cy over the desire for peace.

This is most appar­ent in Cast­ing Blos­soms to the Sky, which tells the dual sto­ries of a jour­nal­ist vis­it­ing Nagao­ka for an arti­cle about the 3.11 dis­as­ter as she also watch­es a play per­formed by the stu­dents of her ex-part­ner about the voic­es lost amid the bomb­ings of Japan­ese cities in World War Two.

It’s a decid­ed­ly more hope­ful film than those that fol­lowed, depict­ing a younger gen­er­a­tion that grew up in peace and crav­ing that sta­tus quo while shar­ing the real sto­ries of vet­er­ans of war and dis­as­ter from the area in a blend of fic­tion and doc­u­men­tary. Impor­tant­ly, it com­pares the human atroc­i­ties of war with the indif­fer­ence of pow­er to act. Ulti­mate­ly it is a sto­ry about gen­er­a­tional trau­ma, the sto­ries passed on, and an impas­sioned plea to come togeth­er as a nation to rebuild.

These films are less about war, instead serving as lessons for how to fix a broken world.

As time went on, the opti­mism of this film soon fad­ed. The nation-build­ing that took shape under the right-wing Lib­er­al Demo­c­ra­t­ic Par­ty dis­re­gard­ed lessons of peace and cama­raderie for an attempt to use their pow­er to push for con­sti­tu­tion­al amend­ments that would cod­i­fy a Japan­ese army for the first time since 1945. The idea of find­ing strength in adver­si­ty was appro­pri­at­ed for mil­i­tant ide­ol­o­gy, and con­tro­ver­sy over rewrit­ing his­to­ry books to glo­ri­fy acts of impe­ri­al­ism was reignit­ed. The baton was being passed to a post-war gen­er­a­tion that lacked lived expe­ri­ences of war, and their lessons threat­ened to be forgotten.

Sev­en Weeks arose from this uncer­tain­ty as a ground­ed fam­i­ly dra­ma set against the back­drop of the death of a fam­i­ly mem­ber. While Mit­suo grieves for her recent­ly-depart­ed grand­fa­ther, sto­ries of his life dur­ing World War Tw0 and relics of his past come to life as mem­o­ries that direct­ly chal­lenge the igno­rance of war amongst the younger adults, some of whom direct­ly debate the mer­its of chang­ing the con­sti­tu­tion. Far less dry than this syn­op­sis sug­gests, Sev­en Weeks mourns the fad­ing hope of a pos­i­tive future through the lens of death.

A person in a long, dark dress standing on a hilltop, silhouetted against a vivid sky with dramatic clouds in shades of orange, red, and purple.

By the time Hana­gata­mi was released, Obayashi had been diag­nosed with ter­mi­nal can­cer (he would make one more film, the mag­nif­i­cent Labyrinth of Cin­e­ma, which acts as a coda to this tril­o­gy, before pass­ing away in 2020). If hope had been lost to grief in Sev­en Weeks, this grief has grown into anger at the fail­ures of Japan to come togeth­er. The result is a cru­el tale of a gen­er­a­tion ripped apart by war as they sac­ri­fice their youth and their lives to a gov­ern­ment-man­dat­ed war, with clear com­par­isons made between the war gen­er­a­tion and those forced to come of age amidst eco­nom­ic stag­na­tion and the dis­place­ment of 3.11 survivors.

In spite of the anger that trans­formed it into what we see today, Hana­gata­mi was also a pas­sion project 40 years in the mak­ing, con­dens­ing the director’s phi­los­o­phy and out­look into a decades-span­ning mag­num opus about life, death and war. Ask­ing old­er actors to por­tray school chil­dren offers these char­ac­ters matu­ri­ty beyond their years, the faces of peo­ple whose child­hood and youth were snatched away by war. The film is book­end­ed by open­ing and clos­ing mono­logues that bring the 1937 source mate­r­i­al by Kazuo Dan and the 3.11 earth­quake into the text of the film itself, direct­ly ques­tion­ing if the sac­ri­fices made by the inno­cent for an uncar­ing elite were ever worth the cost.

In an inter­view with MUBI Note­book in 2017, Obayashi was blunt. For those who expe­ri­enced los­ing the war, 3.11 was a do-over… I thought we will learn to be com­pas­sion­ate and work togeth­er. I thought the Japan­ese will cast away nuclear pow­er plants and will move to a bet­ter direc­tion, but sad­ly the gov­ern­ment doesn’t move that way. And the one rea­son is because with­out war, they can’t feed themselves.”

Obayashi’s Anti-War Tril­o­gy is a blue­print. These films are less about war, instead serv­ing as lessons for how to fix a bro­ken world; view­ing them sole­ly as anti-war films ignores this. Divi­sion, dis­trust and despair fuel our eager will­ing­ness to believe fake news, anti-Covid con­spir­a­cies and take aim at our fel­low peo­ple. If 3.11 was a lost oppor­tu­ni­ty, Covid is a sec­ond chance. How­ev­er van­ish­ing it feels, maybe there are lessons to be learned from our past.

Nobuhiko Obayashi’s Anti-War Tril­o­gy is released on lim­it­ed edi­tion Blu-ray on 13 Decem­ber via Third Win­dow Films.

You might like