Disney has added cultural depiction warnings to some streaming titles

The House of Mouse has flagged “outdated” stereotypes on its new streaming platform – but is it enough?


Charles Bramesco


It’s hardly a secret that Disney, the happiest friendliest smiliest corporation on Earth, has some skeletons in their closet. Their films reproduce the hegemonic ideology of the era of their production, which is just a cinema-major way of saying that their library contains some ethnic stereotypes shocking to a present-day viewer but not so out-of-joint with a less-enlightened time.

When the company first announced that they’d make their full catalogue of titles available via the Disney+ streaming service, about five seconds elapsed before someone wondered if that would include their earlier, rosily racist work as well. Now that Disney Plus is up and (for the most part) running, the question of how the studio will reckon with its own past has been answered, though not to everyone’s satisfaction.

For starters, Song of the South has been given the heave-ho, along with a Simpsons episode already pulled from circulation. That episode, ‘Stark Raving Dad’, features a depiction of Michael Jackson made regrettable by the recent pedophilia allegations against him; Song of the South shines kindly on the evils of slavery and plays on the Uncle Remus stock character, seen as demeaning to the black community by many critics.

Far more common is a brief disclaimer, two sentences and tacked on before the first frame: “This program is presented as originally created. It may contain outdated cultural depictions.” Both in phraseology and its application, Disney’s protocol here has left something to be desired.

The conditional unsureness of the phrase “may contain” should raise an eyebrow; is the suggestion that the blatantly Orientalist-designed Siamese cats of Lady and the Tramp ‘may’ qualify as ‘outdated’ and that they ‘may’ not? What’s more, this largely perfunctory sentence does nothing to articulate, clarify, or otherwise contextualize the subject at hand.

It wasn’t so long ago that Warner Bros attached a thorough and thoughtful caveat to some of their dicier cartoons, explaining that racial prejudice was commonplace in this age of American society, and that while the studio does not endorse this material at present, it would historical denialism to erase them completely. Disney has taken a less nuanced approach, taking out the racial element entirely to cast the faults as an old version of art that simply requires a new patch download.

The selection of titles to which Disney has attached this warning also seems a tad telling. While Dumbo’s “Jim Crow”, Lady and the Tramp’s Siamese cats, and Peter Pan’s caricatured Native Americans all merited the disclaimer card, the recent Aladdin (pilloried by some Middle Eastern detractors for Agrabah’s stereotype-informed depiction of the region) does not. There’s an underlying implication that racism was something that happened before civil rights and then ended, leaving the ’90s a morally upstanding time, when in actuality there was still plenty of maturing to be done.

The wax of digital media and the wane of the physical means that studios hold more power and control over how their films are seen than ever. It’s absolutely essential to keep the true memory of history alive, because every year, it’s just going to get easier and easier for those in authority to rewrite it.

Published 14 Nov 2019

Tags: Disney

Suggested For You

Disney’s Snow White remake needs to send a new message to young audiences

By Rebecca Speare-Cole

A new live-action update can’t afford to deal in outdated gender politics.

Has the Netflix vs Disney streaming war already been won?

By Jack Kavanagh

Disney’s plans for a Star Wars TV series could prove the Death Star to Netflix’s Alderaan.

Revisiting Disney’s bizarre live-action run from the 1960s to the ’80s

By Charles Bramesco

Disney+ will soon be a repository for kiddie films forgotten by time.

Little White Lies Logo

About Little White Lies

Little White Lies was established in 2005 as a bi-monthly print magazine committed to championing great movies and the talented people who make them. Combining cutting-edge design, illustration and journalism, we’ve been described as being “at the vanguard of the independent publishing movement.” Our reviews feature a unique tripartite ranking system that captures the different aspects of the movie-going experience. We believe in Truth & Movies.