We’re still figuring out how to capture comic… | Little White Lies

We’re still fig­ur­ing out how to cap­ture com­ic books on screen

19 Jan 2019

Words by Tom Dunn

A young Black man with curly hair wearing a red jacket and a green shirt, set against a vibrant red and blue background with distorted patterns.
A young Black man with curly hair wearing a red jacket and a green shirt, set against a vibrant red and blue background with distorted patterns.
With super­hero movies reach­ing sat­u­ra­tion point, it’s time more embraced the visu­al tone and tex­ture of the phys­i­cal medium.

From the out­set, Bob Per­sichet­ti, Peter Ram­sey and Rod­ney Rothman’s Spi­der-Man: Into the Spi­der-Verse announces itself as a faith­ful com­ic book adap­ta­tion. The film­mak­ers’ deep affec­tion for the medi­um is evi­dent in every frame: a team of 142 ani­ma­tors ren­dered the CGI before work­ing 2D ele­ments on top, akin to the process of a com­ic book pen­ciller hand­ing their work over for ink­ing before publication.

The result is arguably the most authen­tic on-screen recre­ation of a phys­i­cal com­ic book to date, with Ben-Day dots and cross-hatched shad­ing lend­ing a sense of weight and tex­ture that’s imme­di­ate­ly iden­ti­fi­able to any com­ic fan. It’s a refresh­ing approach to 3D ani­ma­tion that cer­tain­ly makes it feel as though you’re watch­ing a com­ic. But does it make you feel like you’re read­ing one?

For such a sat­u­rat­ed mar­ket, it’s remark­able how lit­tle inter­est most super­hero movie direc­tors have in adapt­ing the visu­al tone and rhythm of a phys­i­cal com­ic book. In his sem­i­nal text on fun­ny-book cre­ation, Comics and Sequen­tial Art’, leg­endary com­ic book artist Will Eis­ner ded­i­cates a whole chap­ter to the issue of tim­ing – specif­i­cal­ly the rela­tion­ship between the com­ic book page, the pan­els it con­sti­tutes, and the gut­ter’ space that sits between.

Togeth­er, these form a visu­al lan­guage that denotes time for the read­er, allow­ing you to con­sid­er spe­cif­ic moments in sequence – with cer­tain pan­els hav­ing more impor­tance con­veyed by either their size or gap in time con­veyed on its neigh­bour­ing pan­els. The short­er the gap, the more crit­i­cal the moment. You could argue that Zack Sny­der was effec­tive­ly hand­ed a com­plete set of sto­ry­boards for Watch­men, but it’s this sense of pace that his adap­ta­tion cru­cial­ly miss­es; his slo-mo action sequences con­fuse the leisure of the read­ing expe­ri­ence with melodrama.

For the film­mak­er, it doesn’t help that while com­ic book pan­els make an effec­tive sto­ry­board on the sur­face, it’s dif­fi­cult to account for the vari­ety of sizes and shapes they’re cap­tured in on the page. War­ren Beatty’s large­ly-for­got­ten Dick Tra­cy adap­ta­tion admirably cham­pi­oned the idea of every pan­el (or frame) mat­ter­ing, thanks to Vit­to­rio Storaro’s con­sid­ered and high­ly stylised cinematography.

Yet although the care­ful com­po­si­tions – made up of heavy shad­ows and a lim­it­ed sev­en-colour palette – are a lov­ing homage to Chester Gould’s orig­i­nal news­pa­per strip, they ulti­mate­ly become a rod for the film’s own back: every shot is the size of the screen-as-pan­el. What’s more, the film’s expan­sive use of mat­te-paint­ed back­drops is, at first, breath­tak­ing – but it also meant that every shot is either sta­t­ic or on a slow dol­ly. Indi­vid­u­al­ly, the scenes of Dick Tra­cy are a delight. As a film, they make for a total slog.

It may well have been the box office fail­ure of Dick Tra­cy that result­ed in stu­dios steer­ing well clear of any attempt to mim­ic the stac­ca­to-like move­ment of a com­ic book for so long, but two decades lat­er Edgar Wright more than made up for it with the hyper-kinet­ic Scott Pil­grim vs The World. Cram­ming six(!) graph­ic nov­els into two hours, Wright’s love of a good mon­tage found its nat­ur­al home in the world of comics, com­bin­ing here with sud­den, flu­id cuts between scenes – linked by one visu­al ele­ment remain­ing con­stant – to effec­tive­ly con­vey the vignette-like nature of read­ing across panels.

Two people, a man in a light blue shirt and a woman in a pink blouse, standing against a dark wooden background.

Fin­ished off with cap­tions and ono­matopoeia, this visu­al treat­ment cer­tain­ly gets close to the act of read­ing. It almost feels as though Wright set out to make the antithe­sis of Beatty’s flawed exper­i­ment; in Scott Pil­grim, the cuts stack up end­less­ly, and where Dick Tra­cy bare­ly moved under its own weight, Wright’s film is so breath­less it car­ries almost no weight whatsoever.

But in the homogenised world of com­ic book adap­ta­tions, at least Scott Pil­grim tries to be some­thing dif­fer­ent. In keep­ing with a trend which has emerged over the past decade, 2019 will see at least one major super­hero film occu­py­ing mul­ti­plex­es each month. Sure­ly if this genre is to have longevi­ty beyond this cur­rent cycle, it must seek to push itself fur­ther, explor­ing what makes com­ic books unique.

The cli­mac­tic moment of Spi­der-Man: Into The Spi­der-Verse sees new­bie hero Miles Morales jump from a build­ing for the first time, unsure if he’ll make it. We watch an extend­ed sequence of him flail­ing through the air, the sound design empha­sis­ing the wind whip­ping around him. Then, with four short, sharp pan­els brought on screen in sequence, we see him shoot a lit­er­al life­line that makes good on his leap of faith.

There’s no lin­ger­ing shot, no slo-mo melo­dra­ma. Just a make-or-break deci­sion cap­tured across four beats. What com­ic book movies need is more of just that: trust­ing in the audi­ence to read the action, and bring their own reac­tion to it.

You might like