1980s cinema and the disturbing side of suburbia | Little White Lies

1980s cin­e­ma and the dis­turb­ing side of suburbia

25 Jul 2018

Words by James Morton

A man in a black suit crouching in a grassy field.
A man in a black suit crouching in a grassy field.
With the likes of Blue Vel­vet and Soci­ety, the decade saw the Amer­i­can Dream turn into some­thing grotesque.

Amer­i­can sub­ur­bia has rarely been a place of con­tent­ment on screen. It’s so reg­u­lar­ly entwined with the Amer­i­can Dream – a region of trimmed lawns, bar­be­cues, men in fedo­ras and smil­ing apron-clad women – that it’s always seemed ripe for par­o­dy. There’s no longer any­thing rev­o­lu­tion­ary about a film set in sub­ur­bia where – shock hor­ror! – its inhab­i­tants are mis­er­able. Post-war cin­e­ma had been steadi­ly prob­ing the back­drop as a source of satire, but it wasn’t until the 1980s when, with a flur­ry of David Cro­nen­berg-inspired hor­ror films, the depic­tion of the sub­urbs went com­plete­ly crazy.

In the 80s, sub­ur­bia was an easy tar­get. David Lynch’s Blue Vel­vet high­light­ed the hor­ri­fy­ing char­ac­ters lurk­ing behind pris­tine white pick­et fences, while Pol­ter­geist pitched sub­ur­bia as a dis­trict quite lit­er­al­ly cov­er­ing up its flaws (the film’s haunt­ed house sits atop a bur­ial ground). Bri­an Yuzna’s body hor­ror Soci­ety sees teenage Bill (Bil­ly War­lock) dis­cov­er that his fam­i­ly are part of a grue­some orgy for the social elite. Bob Balaban’s Par­ents fea­tures a sub­ur­ban child grad­u­al­ly real­is­ing his par­ents are can­ni­bals as they feed him sus­pi­cious left­overs” on a night­ly basis.

So why the pro­nounced shift to the grotesque in the 80s? It all starts with the peri­od after World War Two, when those who sur­vived flocked to the sub­urbs to start their nuclear fam­i­lies and ini­ti­ate the Baby Boom. Around this time depic­tions of sub­ur­bia in Amer­i­can cin­e­ma were pre­dom­i­nant­ly sweet­ness-and-light. Recov­er­ing from wartime tur­moil, audi­ences want­ed opti­mism and escapism, in both their real lives and the lives they chose to view on-screen.

In real­i­ty, the sub­urbs offered secu­ri­ty. Doris Day and Cary Grant were arguably the era’s biggest stars, and their schtick was straight­for­ward: a cou­ple meet, fall in love, and after a few twists and turns, wind up in each other’s arms. It was whole­some stuff, and every­one lived hap­pi­ly ever after with­in a three-act struc­ture. The com­fort for post-war Amer­i­ca was ample – but it was all so bliss­ful­ly idyl­lic, it was only a mat­ter of time before peo­ple wised up to its falseness.

A woman with blonde hair shouting, mouth open wide, wearing a pink strapless top against a blurred background.

In the 50s, a few mut­ter­ings of rebel­lion emerged. Dou­glas Sirk’s All That Heav­en Allows and Nun­nal­ly Johnson’s The Man in the Gray Flan­nel Suit placed a scep­ti­cal eye on the set­ting. By the 70s, sub­ur­ban satire had become a sub-genre in itself, with The Step­ford Wives and John Carpenter’s Hal­loween notably debunk­ing the myth that sub­ur­bia was a place of safe­ty, sug­gest­ing real per­il lay beyond the hedges.

Then came the 80s, an era that served as a bridge between 70s exper­i­men­tal cin­e­ma and Video Nas­ties, a time of Amer­i­can Were­wolf in Lon­don and Michael Jackson’s Thriller where gross-out spe­cial effects were the order of the day. It was also a time when tele­vi­sion sched­ules were still pri­mar­i­ly devot­ed to after-school spe­cials about nuclear fam­i­lies resolv­ing their issues in 22-minute chunks, hug­ging each oth­er and learn­ing valu­able life lessons. Amer­i­can TV wasn’t yet send­ing up sub­ur­bia or pol­i­tics. That respon­si­bil­i­ty was cinema’s alone. And US pol­i­tics at the time was ripe for parody.

Ronald Rea­gan romped to a land­slide vic­to­ry in the 1980 pres­i­den­tial elec­tion, promis­ing to restore Eisen­how­er-era val­ues of fam­i­ly, small gov­ern­ment and tak­ing a hard­er line against inter­na­tion­al pow­ers. In the UK, Prime Min­is­ter Mar­garet Thatch­er held more seats than any Con­ser­v­a­tive since Harold Macmil­lan. Neolib­er­al con­ser­vatism had a strong­hold on these major world pow­ers, and along with this came nos­tal­gia for the 1950s and the sim­plic­i­ty of good clean sub­ur­ban living.

Now we again find our­selves in a world seduced by nos­tal­gia, both polit­i­cal­ly and in terms of the media we con­sume. And the era we seem to be look­ing to most for escapism is the 80s. Those who grew up in that decade were deeply nos­tal­gic for the 50s, and so tried to emu­late that peri­od. Per­haps nos­tal­gia will always beget nos­tal­gia – but rather than buy­ing into nos­tal­gia so read­i­ly, we should look at the movies of the time and con­sid­er what film­mak­ers were try­ing to say about the world then.

The cin­e­ma of the 1980s ridiculed 1950s nos­tal­gia by sug­gest­ing it wasn’t real, and utilised increas­ing­ly extreme meth­ods to labour that point across. Thir­ty years from now, per­haps peo­ple will be nos­tal­gic for the 2010s.

You might like