Wonderstruck – first look review | Little White Lies

Festivals

Won­der­struck – first look review

18 May 2017

Words by David Jenkins

A woman with brown hair wearing an orange top, looking directly at the camera against a blurred natural background.
A woman with brown hair wearing an orange top, looking directly at the camera against a blurred natural background.
Todd Haynes returns with a kid-friend­ly fol­low-up to Car­ol whose parts are more inter­est­ing than the sum total.

If you can claim to have made one of the great films of the 21st cen­tu­ry, how on earth do you go about mak­ing fol­low up state­ment? Todd Haynes, wow­er of Cannes back in 2015 with his vin­tage gay swoon­er, Car­ol, has answered that ques­tion like this: don’t rest on your lau­rels, don’t play to the fan­base, and deliv­er some­thing new, sur­pris­ing and heart­felt. His new one, Won­der­struck, is based on Bri­an Selznick’s adap­ta­tion of his own 2011 his­tor­i­cal nov­el”, and it’s the type of woozy, youth-ori­ent­ed fan­ta­sy flick that plays like an unearthed rel­ic from the 70s coun­ter­cul­ture movement.

It’s a fam­i­ly movie aimed at peo­ple who didn’t grow up with a tele­vi­sion in their house, or went out col­lect­ing gem­stones instead of play­ing Nin­ten­do. It’s a book­ish film for book­ish kids, but one so suf­fused with heady nos­tal­gia (for movies, rela­tion­ships and phys­i­cal objects) that it’s extreme­ly tough not to be touched by its entire­ly nobel intentions.

Where Car­ol was a sto­ry told entire­ly through nuance and per­for­mance, this one relies on actors to sim­ply car­ry an over­sized nar­ra­tive torch from one lips­mack­ing set-piece to the next. 1977, and Oakes Feg­ley plays Ben­ji, a lank-haired scamp who lost his moth­er in a car acci­dent and so decides – after being deaf­ened by a rogue light­en­ing strike – to hit the dusty trail and locate his estranged father, who he believes runs a book­store in New York City.

Mean­while, back in mono­chrome 1927, deaf dream­er Rose also makes a bee-line for the Big Apple to con­nect with Lil­lian May­hew (Julianne Moore), a silent screen star­let with whom she is obsessed. The sto­ry then accom­pa­nies us to the point at which these two strands connect.

This is a big num­ber for Haynes, and as such he’s gone all out on pro­duc­tion design. His vision of New York at var­i­ous points across the 20th cen­tu­ry is one gleaned from art and pop cul­ture, with Ben­ji step­ping through the Port Author­i­ty door to the sound of funk music and the sight of pedes­tri­ans slo-mo strut­ting like they’re on a pub­lic cat­walk (cos­tume design­er Sandy Pow­ell, doing great work once more). Although the emo­tions with­in the sto­ry some­times feel over­ly direct and obvi­ous, Haynes’ deep love for each frame is pal­pa­ble at every turn. If it’s pos­si­ble to want to weep at the sight of peri­od spe­cif­ic bus sta­tion vend­ing machines, then this is the film to make that happen.

All the ingre­di­ents are there, but there’s some­thing that just doesn’t quite bind the mix togeth­er. It’s hard not to want to point the fin­ger at Selznick’s shag­gy sto­ry, which offers lit­tle beyond melo­dra­mat­ic coin­ci­dences and a love let­ter to pub­lic muse­ums that’s been penned in all caps. One low point is Ben’s wide-eyed fast friend Jamie (Jaden Michael) who, for some rea­son, has back stages pass­es at the Amer­i­can Muse­um of Nat­ur­al His­to­ry, and so allows for much tool­ing around and caper­ing among the dusty store cup­boards. The dra­mat­ic stakes also remain woe­ful­ly low, as nei­ther Ben­ji nor Rose ever con­front any actu­al dan­ger or threat on their cross-coun­try jour­neys of self discovery.

Yet Haynes devo­tees will find much to enjoy, name­ly all the jol­ly ref­er­ences to the director’s own vaunt­ed back cat­a­logue. And it’s for­mal rather than the­mat­ic call­backs, as Won­der­struck takes in reimag­ined silent cin­e­ma, mod­el recre­ation, hero wor­ship and even peo­ple strug­gling to deal with phys­i­cal defi­cien­cy. The film is very sim­i­lar in style and tone to Mar­tin Scorsese’s Hugo, which was also based on a Selznick nov­el. But where that film seemed to gid­di­ly punc­ture through the prose to deliv­er a cogent and impas­sioned trea­tise on the vital­i­ty of cin­e­ma, this one takes in a big deep breath, but let’s out a mut­ed (albeit tune­ful) yelp.

You might like