Why I love Ingrid Bergman’s performance in… | Little White Lies

In Praise Of

Why I love Ingrid Bergman’s per­for­mance in Notorious

12 Aug 2016

Words by Matthew Anderson

Black and white image of a man and woman in a close, intimate embrace.
Black and white image of a man and woman in a close, intimate embrace.
The Swedish star was nev­er bet­ter than in this 1946 thriller from Alfred Hitchcock.

There are very fine, often blurred lines between noto­ri­ety, fame, pop­u­lar­i­ty and infamy in the movie busi­ness and few stars had to so per­sis­tent­ly endure their objec­ti­fy­ing slings and arrows as Ingrid Bergman. Over the course of a glit­ter­ing career the wil­ful­ly inde­pen­dent Swedish actress made front page head­lines for scan­dal and suc­cess in equal mea­sure; most famous­ly for an affair with Ital­ian neo-real­ist direc­tor Rober­to Rosselli­ni which would lead to chil­dren and a sec­ond marriage.

It is telling, or rather sad­ly prophet­ic, there­fore, that after denot­ing a time and place – Mia­mi, Flori­da, Three-Twen­ty PM, April the Twen­ty-Fourth, Nine­teen Hun­dred and Forty-Six – the first thing we see in Alfred Hitchcock’s Noto­ri­ous is a reporter’s cam­era. A pow­er­ful weapon of scruti­ny and inva­sion used to incite pub­lic out­rage as much then as it is today, a suc­ces­sion of burst­ing flash bulbs and notepads flut­ter as Ali­cia Huberman’s father is con­demned for trea­son. Whether through the lens of a paparazzi or Hitchcock’s all-see­ing cam­era, Bergman’s char­ac­ter becomes the bewil­dered, unwit­ting pawn of spy games engi­neered exclu­sive­ly by extra­ne­ous male forces.

The ongo­ing machi­na­tions of a Ger­man war machine decamped to South Amer­i­ca become the high stakes in this under­stat­ed thriller, but it is the pol­i­tics of gen­der, pow­er and con­trol that the direc­tor fore­grounds and nav­i­gates so superbly. In the open­ing scene press vul­tures cir­cle out­side the court­room know­ing that Ali­cia is the sto­ry, the spec­ta­cle, stunned and stun­ning­ly beau­ti­ful. CIA men, prin­ci­pal­ly Cary Grant’s Devlin and his supe­ri­or, Prescott (Louis Cal­h­ern), are just as speedy in swoop­ing down to recruit her as the daugh­ter of a trai­tor” and use­ful depart­men­tal tool. Demands are made of her, and men active­ly want some­thing from her at every turn. How­ev­er, though con­trol­ling pub­lic opin­ion and her involve­ment in a dan­ger­ous oper­a­tion respec­tive­ly, these men are entire­ly depen­dent upon her. They are cal­lous in their manip­u­la­tion but with­out her would have nothing.

And yet she is nei­ther cat nor mouse in this conun­drum, find­ing her­self in a curi­ous no (wo)man’s land of oppos­ing exte­ri­or and inte­ri­or forces. The cen­tral par­ty sequence, and dis­cov­ery of the sin­is­ter intrigue, hinges on a key to the wine cel­lar. Ali­cia ful­fils a sim­i­lar­ly cru­cial role but one that evolves: she is at once a cat­a­lyst for the sto­ry, the linch­pin of dom­i­nant male plans, an object of phys­i­cal desire and a damsel in distress.

Bergman’s soft deliv­ery and porce­lain com­plex­ion lend a fragili­ty that per­fect­ly suits the char­ac­ter. There is no doubt as to who is pulling the strings behind the cam­era but onscreen mis­con­cep­tions of the type of woman’ she is, pro­nounced upon by men who know only gos­sip, elic­its sym­pa­thy from the view­er and momen­tary indig­na­tion from Devlin who swift­ly falls for her. Ini­tial­ly a char­ac­ter­is­tic mea­sure of still­ness, exud­ing calm and a feline sure­ty of move­ment, Grant’s self-con­trol and abil­i­ty to main­tain a clear head evap­o­rates as his heart takes hold. It is his late real­i­sa­tion that saves an ensnared Ali­cia from Alex and his dom­i­neer­ing moth­er (Leopol­dine Kon­stan­tine) slow­ly poi­son­ing her coffee.

That said, when Ali­cia is manoeu­vred into posi­tion to entrap aris­to­crat­ic Nazi sym­pa­this­er Alex Sebas­t­ian (Claude Rains) and duly sleeps with him, believ­ing that to be part of the CIA’s plan, Devlin’s jeal­ous reac­tion epit­o­mis­es the male hypocrisy on show here. Ali­cia is at least con­sis­tent in her patri­ot­ic deter­mi­na­tion and love for Devlin, to the extent she mar­ries Alex in order to ingra­ti­ate her­self with the tar­get, ulti­mate­ly foil­ing their plan. Who is using who is clear but with­out her female sex­u­al­i­ty, cun­ning and intel­li­gence, stuffed shirts behind desks would get nowhere. She achieves a lot more for Uncle Sam than the big­ot­ed pen­cil push­ers, so who’s real­ly wear­ing the trousers here? It’s the dame in the long black dress.

You might like