The Hitman’s Wife’s Bodyguard | Little White Lies

The Hitman’s Wife’s Bodyguard

18 Jun 2021 / Released: 18 Jun 2021

Three people, two men and one woman, sitting in a dimly lit room.
Three people, two men and one woman, sitting in a dimly lit room.
2

Anticipation.

A sequel to a pretty poor original that itself felt stretched and silly? O-kay…

2

Enjoyment.

Feels like someone needed some filmic matter to a very tight deadline, and this is the result.

2

In Retrospect.

Binnable.

This dire action-com­e­dy feels like it was thrown togeth­er with a min­i­mum of care and attention.

There’s a spe­cial effect cur­rent­ly doing the rounds, most­ly in pro­duc­tion-line com­e­dy films with mod­er­ate bud­gets, in which a per­son is sud­den­ly run over by some kind of fast mov­ing vehi­cle. Usu­al­ly you’ll have a medi­um shot of your vic­tim, and they will be stand­ing there in a state of mild repose, unex­pect­ing of incom­ing trau­ma, and then sud­den­ly, from either frame left or frame right, a car will whizz into view and send them tum­bling like a CG ragdoll.

It’ll prob­a­bly take a cine-sleuth of con­sid­er­able tal­ent to trace this now com­mon­place motif back to its very own patient zero, but I have a feel­ing that Brad Pitt get­ting ten­derised by a cou­ple of speed­ing RVs while dawdling in the mid­dle of a busy high street in Mar­tin Brest’s Meet Joe Black may have some explain­ing to do. While it has often been used for shock effects and jump scares, it’s also being used increas­ing­ly for com­ic pur­pos­es – even rolled out in recent kid­die com­e­dy, Peter Rab­bit 2.

This move”, now so hack­neyed as to bare­ly reg­is­ter as either shock­ing or humor­ous, is wheeled out mul­ti­ple times in Patrick Hugh­es’ almost sur­re­al­ly incom­pre­hen­si­ble The Hitman’s Wife’s Body­guard. Each time, Ryan Reynolds’ prep­py, once AAA-rat­ed body­guard Michael Bryce is sent fly­ing, once over the roof of a run­away Tra­bant, and is lat­er shunt­ed into the shal­lows of a near­by har­bour. Yes, yes, very fun­ny. Let’s have the annoy­ing char­ac­ter humil­i­at­ed in a traf­fic acci­dent so we can emit a giant bel­ly laugh as we wit­ness his limp frame hurtling through the air only to be crum­pled onto the hard tarmac.

The rea­son why I flag this is twofold: it’s a sign­post for the film’s crass­ly retro­fit­ted style, where every cre­ative deci­sion appears to have been made as a result of neces­si­ty rather than desire. The film most­ly takes place in Italy for no rea­son. A deal has been made where a selec­tion of Ital­ian tourist hotspots have been made avail­able for film­ing, and the sto­ry takes place in those places rather than inhab­it­ing them with a pur­pose. This effect fea­tures in the film because the tech­nol­o­gy to exe­cute the effect is avail­able for use and is rel­a­tive­ly sim­ple to oper­ate. It’s not there as the result of cre­ative innovation.

It’s also a sign of the film’s ret­ro­grade sense of humour in which phys­i­cal pain and swear­ing is the only cur­ren­cy worth a damn. What irks me about this run­ning over effect is that, even since it was seen over two decades ago in Meet Joe Black, it some­how looks as bad now as it did then. There’s some­thing supreme­ly off-putting about a dig­i­tal effect that is intend­ed to seam­less­ly repli­cate real­i­ty, but looks absolute­ly noth­ing like it. When Reynolds is run over, you can see the moment where the actor is replaced with a pix­e­lat­ed ren­der­ing of his body, and he’s off down the stu­dio bar for hap­py hour and the rest is hashed out in post.

If it doesn’t look even vague­ly real, then what’s the point? If any­thing, wouldn’t it be fun­nier to do a prac­ti­cal ver­sion of the effect where Reynolds is replaced by an obvi­ous dum­my and then returns to Reynolds when the main impact is com­plet­ed? It’s not the job of a crit­ic to tell a film­mak­er how to make a film, but it would seem strange not to advise of the numer­ous open goals avail­able. What­ev­er… Hol­ly­wood should retire this effect imme­di­ate­ly. It is dumb and inau­then­tic and it would appear that no-one work­ing in the world of com­put­er effects has yet worked out how to employ it in a way that’s even mild­ly appealing.

Aside from the across-the-board atro­cious effects work (includ­ing a cli­mac­tic explo­sion looks like it was ren­dered on a defec­tive Ami­ga 500), there’s a cou­ple of cheap laughs to be had in this quick­ie cash-in sequel, main­ly care of Salma Hayek’s dirty Spang­lish-speak­ing con­woman Sonia, who is giv­en the lion share of the script’s juicy one-lin­ers. Reynolds, who seems like a stand-up guy (no, lit­er­al­ly, he acts like he’s doing stand-up!), is deep slum­ming with cheap­jack mate­r­i­al like this, though there are a few pal­pa­ble hits among the myr­i­ad miss­es. Samuel L Jack­son, mean­while, looks like he’s rocked up to the set in his civil­ian clothes, has made-up all his own lines, and the direc­tor has just said, yeah, what­ev­er, go with it.”

You might like

Accessibility Settings

Text

Applies the Open Dyslexic font, designed to improve readability for individuals with dyslexia.

Applies a more readable font throughout the website, improving readability.

Underlines links throughout the website, making them easier to distinguish.

Adjusts the font size for improved readability.

Visuals

Reduces animations and disables autoplaying videos across the website, reducing distractions and improving focus.

Reduces the colour saturation throughout the website to create a more soothing visual experience.

Increases the contrast of elements on the website, making text and interface elements easier to distinguish.