Review by Anton Bitel @AntBit

Directed by

Matt Bettinelli-Olpin Tyler Gillett


Courteney Cox David Arquette Neve Campbell


Love the original Scream, and Olpin and Gillett are directors to watch.


Well crafted, but really just the same old-same old.

In Retrospect.

Sure whodunnit, but also, really now, whocares?

This stylishly directed “requel” trickily rakes over the grave of the original Scream films, but please, no more!

Not long after Wes Craven went all postmodern on a franchise of his own in Wes Craven’s New Nightmare, the director gave a similar self-referential treatment to John Carpenter’s Halloween and its many ’80s imitators with Scream. Along the way he used the power of pastiche to revive not only the slasher, but also an entire horror genre grown moribund in the early nineties.

Where Scream looked back to slashers past, its sequels increasingly just looked back to Scream, circling ever inwards to rapidly diminishing, self-involved returns while proving very reluctant to kill their darlings. In 2011, 11 years after his trilogy ended, Craven returned for a fourth, but despite introducing the next generation, could not quite bring himself to let his surviving company of ‘legacy’ characters (once themselves young adults, now just adults) be overtaken or outdone by the new blood that this franchise very much needed. And so it played like a reactionary victory for the olds in a franchise that had once felt so fresh.

Another 11 years later, and with Craven himself now dead, the helm has been handed to directors Matt Bettinelli Olpin and Tyler Gillett for this latest sequel – entitled just Scream without the 5, much as the ‘pretentious’ eighth entry in the Stab franchise-within-a-franchise, loosely based on the ‘real’ Woodsboro killings, is just called Stab.

Yet the spirit of Craven – and Carpenter – still very much haunts this new instalment. “Is Wes still bugging you?” reads a text that Tara Carpenter (Jenna Ortega) receives from her friend Amber (Mikey Madison) in the film’s opening sequence – and even if the text will turn out to be specifically referencing the girls’ schoolfriend Wes Hicks (Dylan Minnette), the son of Woodsboro’s deputy-turned-sheriff Judy Hicks (Marley Shelton), his name, and Tara’s surname, point to a different layer of legacy.

Tara is attacked by a killer in a Ghostface mask who is recreating (and updating) the famous opening scene from the first Scream (and the first Stab). Yet Tara’s survival and subsequent hospitalisation will draw her estranged older sister Sam (Melissa Barbara) back to Woodsboro from Modesto, with boyfriend Richie (Jack Quaid) in tow. As the bodies pile up, old Scream survivors Sidney (Neve Campbell), Gale (Courtney Cox) and Dewey (David Arquette) will also return once again to this ever cold but ever warming case.

They race to unmask the killer – or killers – among themselves or Tara’s super-smart friends (Mason Gooding, Jasmin Savoy Brown, Sonia Ben Ammar, all excellent), in a small town where everyone has inherited an incestuous connection to the original slaughter.

“Where Craven seemed increasingly to be phoning it in, this is the most stylishly directed of all the Scream sequels.”

Meanwhile someone is self-consciously trying to restage, reboot and renew Woodsboro’s nineties massacre and to return things to ground zero – someone who respects the franchise’s tradition of meta-slashing antics, and who expressly cuts short any attempt to introduce voguish post-2000s ‘elevated’ elements. Which is to say that this latest spree is openly modelled – set-piece by set-piece – on the first Scream, even as it constantly negotiates its own delicate status as a ‘requel’ in a shifting horror landscape.

This new Scream toys with our knowledge of the old – a knowledge that we share with the Stab-savvy characters – its very familiarity fuelling nostalgia while letting expectations yield their own modest red herrings. Like Scream 4, it is interested in two very different generations which have both inherited the traumas of the first Scream, even as it skewers precisely the conservative culture of fandom that demands backward-looking sequels like this in the first place.

It is as clever-clever as the rest, and where Craven seemed increasingly – like his masked killers – to be phoning it in, this is certainly the most stylishly directed of all the sequels. But still, its ironic self-consciousness about how tired its material has become does not ultimately make it any less tired. Scream may stab the original repeatedly in the back, and may eviscerate its own tropes from the inside out (not for the first, or even fourth, time), but do we really need to keep (re)re-reading these over-spilt entrails?

In the end, every Ghostface killer is just circling the same old histories and hunting grounds, with little new to show for the effort, except maybe the promise of yet more movie cash-ins.

Published 12 Jan 2022

Tags: Matt Bettinelli-Olpin Scream Tyler Gillett


Love the original Scream, and Olpin and Gillett are directors to watch.


Well crafted, but really just the same old-same old.

In Retrospect.

Sure whodunnit, but also, really now, whocares?

Suggested For You

Have we become the audience in Wes Craven’s New Nightmare?

By Thomas Hobbs

The director’s satirical 1994 horror explores what happens when society embraces its worst monsters.

How Scream became the prom queen of slasher horror

By Adam White

Wes Craven’s seminal 1996 film occupies a uniquely female space.

Thanks Wes Craven for one of the most haunting images of my youth

By David Jenkins

The sudden passing of the horror maestro reminds us that the fear he produced transcended the screen.

Little White Lies Logo

About Little White Lies

Little White Lies was established in 2005 as a bi-monthly print magazine committed to championing great movies and the talented people who make them. Combining cutting-edge design, illustration and journalism, we’ve been described as being “at the vanguard of the independent publishing movement.” Our reviews feature a unique tripartite ranking system that captures the different aspects of the movie-going experience. We believe in Truth & Movies.