I Am Martin Parr review – a one-sided artist… | Little White Lies

I Am Mar­tin Parr review – a one-sided artist portrait

17 Feb 2025 / Released: 21 Feb 2025

Words by David Jenkins

Directed by Lee Shulman

Starring N/A

A group of three people - an elderly couple sitting on a bench and a middle-aged man standing next to them, all looking towards the camera. A "Litter Free Beach £1000 Fine" sign is visible in the background.
A group of three people - an elderly couple sitting on a bench and a middle-aged man standing next to them, all looking towards the camera. A "Litter Free Beach £1000 Fine" sign is visible in the background.
3

Anticipation.

As a Parr skeptic, maybe this new film will turn me around?

2

Enjoyment.

Quite the opposite. Being hectored and shamed into liking a bad artist is no fun.

2

In Retrospect.

Parr’s MO is fascinating, but Shulman’s film is not interested in exploring the ethical gray areas.

An unapolo­getic hagiog­ra­phy of the famed British pho­tog­ra­ph­er whose work chron­i­cles work­ing class leisure time.

What a strange lit­tle pro­mo piece this is for the ven­er­at­ed British doc­u­men­tary pho­tog­ra­ph­er Mar­tin Parr. He is an artist who is known for his ele­vat­ed ver­sions of the saucy sea­side snap, usu­al­ly depict­ing work­ing class rev­ellers enjoy­ing junk food and alco­hol which are intend­ed to sym­bol­ise the grotesque dimen­sions of ram­pant con­sumer capitalism. 

Lee Shulman’s film is unin­ter­est­ed in any­one who finds Parr’s work to be offen­sive, deri­sive, cheap, gaudy or oppor­tunis­tic. It lines up a mul­ti­lin­gual pha­lanx of talk­ing heads to sing his prais­es, with the high­ly sub­jec­tive, He’s just so fun­ny!” defence being trot­ted out repeat­ed­ly. And no-one is real­ly able to jus­ti­fy a neg­a­tive reac­tion beyond some flim-flam­my bet-hedg­ing such as, If you don’t like him, I just think you’re wrong.”

There’s a sto­ry about the ques­tion of Parr’s induc­tion into the inter­na­tion­al pho­to­graph­ic coop­er­a­tive, Mag­num – a pres­ti­gious arts body with which his style of on-the-lam colour flash pho­tog­ra­phy vio­lent­ly clash­es. We hear that half the vot­ing mem­bers threat­ened to burn their mem­ber cards if he was allowed in. The oth­er half, mean­while, threat­ened to burn their cards if he wasn’t. Yet that down-the-mid­dle chasm in appre­ci­a­tion is framed as a stuffy con­ser­v­a­tive old guard reject­ing moder­ni­ty and progress, rather than a reflec­tion of the fact that, for every per­son who loves him, there’s anoth­er who real­ly doesn’t.

In the film he comes across as an avun­cu­lar sort of chap, some­one who’s smi­ley and pleas­ant and in no way the chest-puff­ing artiste. His method is to just wan­der around and wait for the stars to align when he’ll then pull out his cam­era and take a few snaps. Some­times he asks his sub­jects if they’ll pose for him, oth­er times he just fires off a few stealthy rounds and trun­dles off with his cachet (he is seen walk­ing with a mobil­i­ty aid in the film).

Obvi­ous­ly every­one is enti­tled to their opin­ions about Parr, but it’s hard not to come away from this film and not see him as some sort of class trai­tor who prizes satire over empa­thy. We see archive footage of him pho­tograph­ing peo­ple with osten­ta­tious jew­ellery, hand­made cloth­ing and ridicu­lous tat­toos, telling his sub­jects how much he loves their style. But you don’t believe it for a minute: it’s all part of Parr’s ruse to swift­ly ingra­ti­ate him­self with his sub­ject until he’s got­ten what he needs. The rela­tion­ship between artist and sub­ject when it comes to Parr is pre­sent­ed as deeply super­fi­cial; at least some­one like Diane Arbus real­ly cre­at­ed some fas­ci­nat­ing ques­tions about that rela­tion­ship in her famed por­traits of society’s fringe figures.

While this might read like a Parr skep­tic sound­ing off, it’s more about find­ing the ten­sions, con­tro­ver­sies and prob­lems with his art far more inter­est­ing and valu­able than sim­ply being lob­bied to believe that he’s a nation­al treasure.

You might like

Accessibility Settings

Text

Applies the Open Dyslexic font, designed to improve readability for individuals with dyslexia.

Applies a more readable font throughout the website, improving readability.

Underlines links throughout the website, making them easier to distinguish.

Adjusts the font size for improved readability.

Visuals

Reduces animations and disables autoplaying videos across the website, reducing distractions and improving focus.

Reduces the colour saturation throughout the website to create a more soothing visual experience.

Increases the contrast of elements on the website, making text and interface elements easier to distinguish.