Blade Runner: The Final Cut | Little White Lies

Blade Run­ner: The Final Cut

02 Apr 2015 / Released: 03 Apr 2015

Words by David Jenkins

Directed by Ridley Scott

Starring Harrison Ford, Rutger Hauer, and Sean Young

Two individuals, a man with a stern expression and a woman with a pensive look, captured in a moody, dramatic lighting.
Two individuals, a man with a stern expression and a woman with a pensive look, captured in a moody, dramatic lighting.
3

Anticipation.

More tears, more rain.

3

Enjoyment.

It’s no The Counsellor.

3

In Retrospect.

If you’re going to see it, you may as well see it big, bright and loud.

Like a rain-sod­den old friend, Sir Ridley’s exis­ten­tial space-opera gets yet anoth­er cin­e­mat­ic run-out.

There’s a bit­ter­sweet irony to the fact that one of the most famous mod­ern movies made about the finite nature of exis­tence and the inevitabil­i­ty of expi­ra­tion should have been revived and reformed so many times. Sir Rid­ley Scott has a yen for return­ing to films with his trusty toolk­it and tak­ing a bit of a retroac­tive tin­ker, remod­el­ling seg­ments and offer­ing sub­tle vari­a­tions on pre­vi­ous prototypes.

Whether they are bet­ter, worse, clev­er­er, sad­der, longer or short­er is large­ly down to how deep the view­er has immersed him or her­self in the text, and where one diehard super­fan might be reduced to a gib­ber­ing slur­ry of tears and snot upon see­ing a uni­corn run­ning through a for­est in slo-mo, anoth­er more casu­al admir­er might feel it’s a need­less­ly grandiose addi­tion which adds lit­tle to the over­all effect of the film.

Receiv­ing a brand new cin­e­ma roll-out rough­ly every 10 years since its cre­ation in 1982, one must pon­der whether this is a case of a per­fec­tion­ist artist unable to see his defin­ing cre­ation enter into the pub­lic domain in the state that it is, or if the rea­son behind it is pure­ly for the pur­pos­es of rev­enue col­lec­tion. The film famous­ly tanked on its ini­tial release. That could be one jus­ti­fi­ca­tion for the alter­ations, but could also be seen as a pure­ly eco­nom­ic imper­a­tive in which big­ger, bet­ter and more com­plete” ver­sions of films have the chance of clear­ing up all over again.

The issue with Blade Run­ner is, whichev­er way you slice it, the film is by no means a clas­sic — a bunch of smog and fluro lamps pow­ered by GCSE-lev­el exis­ten­tial the­o­ry and bad plumb­ing. It’s now deemed a crime to describe a movie as being pre­ten­tious, the infer­ence being that it’s oper­at­ing on an intel­lec­tu­al plane which the low­ly writer is unable (or, more like­ly, unwill­ing) to fath­om. So let’s say that Blade Run­ner is a movie of extra­or­di­nary self-impor­tance, every immac­u­late vista held for a length of time redo­lent of a direc­tor in rap­tur­ous love with the piece of art he’s made.

The film crit­ic Jonathan Rosen­baum com­pared Scott’s movie to the noir clas­sics of the 1940s, which seems like exces­sive praise con­sid­er­ing the plot doesn’t ever involve the audi­ence being left tan­ta­lis­ing­ly in the dark. We fol­low the par­al­lel sto­ries of Har­ri­son Ford’s boozy depres­sive Rick Deckard and Rut­ger Hauer’s Repli­cant Roy Bat­ty to the point where they meet on a rain-lashed rooftop and pon­der the futil­i­ty of man. It’s a quest movie — where one thing leads mechan­i­cal­ly to anoth­er to anoth­er to anoth­er. There are no twists. It’s noir only in atmos­phere and expres­sion­ist light­ing schemes.

And if the con­cept of ambi­gu­i­ty was too much for audi­ences to han­dle, Sir Rid­ley kind­ly came out to tell every­one that this ver­sion of the film con­firms that Deckard is indeed a Repli­cant, albeit a bet­ter mod­el than the fetish­wear philoso­phers so as to not cre­ate any fur­ther plot holes. Does his true nature have any real bear­ing on the film? Does it effect the out­come or his his­to­ry before and after the time­line of the film? Go to your DVD shelf, pick out a film at ran­dom, watch it, and when the cred­its roll, ask, was [lead character’s name] a Repli­cant?” It’s the exact same thing.

You might like

Accessibility Settings

Text

Applies the Open Dyslexic font, designed to improve readability for individuals with dyslexia.

Applies a more readable font throughout the website, improving readability.

Underlines links throughout the website, making them easier to distinguish.

Adjusts the font size for improved readability.

Visuals

Reduces animations and disables autoplaying videos across the website, reducing distractions and improving focus.

Reduces the colour saturation throughout the website to create a more soothing visual experience.

Increases the contrast of elements on the website, making text and interface elements easier to distinguish.