Moonlight isn’t all about sex – and it’s all the… | Little White Lies

Queer Cinema

Moon­light isn’t all about sex – and it’s all the more queer for it

11 Feb 2017

Words by Josh Lee

A silhouetted profile of a human head against a bright blue background. The head features a distinct profile with a slight curve to the nose and a curved hairline.
A silhouetted profile of a human head against a bright blue background. The head features a distinct profile with a slight curve to the nose and a curved hairline.
By not show­ing phys­i­cal inti­ma­cy, Bar­ry Jenk­ins allows sex­u­al­i­ty to sur­face in his film in oth­er ways.

Moon­light is a metic­u­lous­ly craft­ed, bril­liant­ly act­ed and sump­tu­ous­ly shot com­ing-of-age film about a young, black gay kid grow­ing up in pover­ty in sub­ur­ban Mia­mi. As queer as it is black, Bar­ry Jenk­ins’ film now finds itself tee­ter­ing on the edge of becom­ing the first queer film to win the Acad­e­my Award for Best Pic­ture. But we only need to look back as far as Broke­back Moun­tain to see how het­ero­sex­u­al squea­mish­ness can stop even the most acces­si­ble queer love sto­ries in their tracks. Or Milk, which went some way to desex­u­alise its title char­ac­ter and still missed out on Best Picture.

The com­pro­mis­es made by queer films in past attempts to break the Academy’s Best Pic­ture glass clos­et haunt Moon­light. We don’t just want it to win. We want it to win in the right way, show­ing queer­ness as we recog­nise it. Not just love, but sex. And not for­bid­den, shad­owy sex as seen in films like Broke­back Moun­tain. Hav­ing been shamed for cen­turies, gay cul­ture is now dom­i­nat­ed by sex-pos­i­tiv­i­ty, and we val­ue frank­ness and con­fi­dence in our sex scenes. Increas­ing­ly we see it in tele­vi­sion and films made with only us in mind, but when a fea­ture sets its sights on mass appeal or awards glo­ry, things tend to get a lit­tle timid.

With the sex­u­al con­tent of Moon­light amount­ing to a few awk­ward sec­onds of ado­les­cent hand-job­bing, it’s easy to feel as though the film has exer­cised cau­tious­ness”, as the Guardian’s Guy Lodge put it in his recent analy­sis of the film, when it comes to por­tray­ing phys­i­cal sex. There’s no dis­put­ing that Moon­light isn’t chock full of sex. But describ­ing it as an exer­cise in coy­ness sells the film short. By tran­scend­ing our sex lives, Moon­light makes room for an incred­i­bly rich por­tray­al of what sex­u­al iden­ti­ty is and means for queer men – specif­i­cal­ly for black queer men who face expec­ta­tions of hypermasculinty.

That speci­fici­ty is impor­tant. Where hyper­mas­culin­i­ty man­i­fests, gay sex can be as dan­ger­ous as it is lib­er­at­ing. And let’s not for­get that in Amer­i­ca, one in two black queer men will con­tract HIV in their life­times. So there is a truth­ful­ness in Chiron’s avoid­ance of sex, explained by the betray­al he faces at the hand of his first and only lover, school­friend Kevin, and the wider con­text of the inter­sect­ing oppres­sions faced by men like him in the real world.

A silhouetted profile of a human head against a bright blue background. The head features a distinct profile with a slight curve to the nose and a curved hairline.

That’s not to say clos­et­ed black men don’t have sex. More that the events which shape Chiron’s life – and the world he exists in – are com­pli­cat­ed enough to build a char­ac­ter for whom sex is plau­si­bly a risk worth avoid­ing, no mat­ter how keen the urges. When Chi­ron reunites with Kevin as an adult and admits he nev­er touched anoth­er man again after their encounter, it’s rea­son­able. Chi­ron isn’t being sani­tised like Sean Penn’s Har­vey Milk. There’s a log­ic to why Moon­light is sex­less – and it’s all to do with the big picture.

By tak­ing sex out of the equa­tion, Jenk­ins allows queer­ness to sur­face in oth­er ways. As the cam­era lingers over a young Chi­ron in the bath, queer view­ers will recog­nise how he accepts the sad­ness of iso­la­tion in exchange for a moment’s peace from the hyper-vig­i­lance he’s devel­oped to sur­vive. Lat­er, when we meet Chi­ron as an adult, we recog­nise the hard­ened exte­ri­or he’s built to sur­vive – many of us do the same in our jobs, with our fam­i­lies, and even with each other.

When he reunites with Kevin and that shell cracks, we recog­nise the relief he feels in the knowl­edge that he is safe to be his true self. Every­body gets a lit­tle lone­ly some­times, but Chiron’s soli­tude is queer. We know it because we’ve lived it. For the priv­i­leged among us, it’s an exag­ger­at­ed reflec­tion our own expe­ri­ences. For the less for­tu­nate, it’s to-scale.

Queer­ness may not be artic­u­lat­ed in obvi­ous ways in Moon­light, but much of queer­ness isn’t real­ly artic­u­lat­ed at all in real life. What the film pro­vides instead is arguably more impor­tant. By con­fronting us with queer child­hood, we’re forced to con­sid­er what grow­ing up queer in our het­ero­nor­ma­tive soci­ety robs us of: safe­ty, oppor­tu­ni­ty, peace of mind, authenticity.

Moon­light is a study of aspects of queer­ness we some­times find too painful to talk about, because they demand that we accept that many of us were forced to swap the naiveté of nor­mal” child­hood for con­stant aware­ness of our sur­round­ings and any poten­tial threats. Con­fronting this through Moon­light gives queer audi­ences the chance to rec­on­cile feel­ings of loss and resent­ment towards our child­hoods, and begin heal­ing in a way that no sex scene could.

If Moon­light man­ages to make his­to­ry and take home the Best Pic­ture Oscar, it might have some­thing to do with its lack of onscreen sex. But that doesn’t make it a film of com­pro­mis­es. Moon­light works a study of how mas­cu­line het­ero­nor­ma­tiv­i­ty can break us down and rebuild us in its own repressed, dam­ag­ing image. That’s a far more urgent con­ver­sa­tion than sex­u­al expression.

You might like