Why Death Wish’s pro-gun politics are just as… | Little White Lies

In Praise Of

Why Death Wish’s pro-gun pol­i­tics are just as com­plex as ever

02 Mar 2018

Words by Justine Smith

An elderly Asian man in a dark coat and hat pointing a pistol at the camera.
An elderly Asian man in a dark coat and hat pointing a pistol at the camera.
The film’s glam­or­i­sa­tion of vig­i­lante jus­tice res­onat­ed with an increas­ing­ly para­noid audi­ence in 1974.

In August 2017, the first trail­er for Eli Roth’s remake of Death Wish left audi­ences feel­ing uneasy. The orig­i­nal film, a vig­i­lante revenge thriller direct­ed by Michael Win­ner and star­ring Charles Bron­son, was an unex­pect­ed hit in 1974, inspir­ing four sequels over two decades. Writ­ing about the remake in GQ , Joshua Rivera notes, It takes a pro­found lev­el of either igno­rance or craven, wil­ful oppor­tunism to think that this is a moment to make a film about a white man’s rage chan­neled through the bar­rel of a gun.” Yet even in 1974, Death Wish’s pop­u­lar­i­ty was met with appre­hen­sion and concern.

Back in 1974, The New York Times’ Vin­cent Can­by opened his review: New York City, like all major Amer­i­can cities, has its prob­lems: bad book­keep­ing, pol­lut­ed air, ris­ing costs, reduced ser­vices, high crime rates, a flee­ing mid­dle class. Now you might want to add a movie to the list, Michael Winner’s Death Wish. He goes onto con­clude that the tacky” film endors­es vio­lence, say­ing, Impar­tial­ly. Its mes­sage, sim­ply put, is: Kill. Try it. You’ll like it.”

Death Wish joined Mean Streets, Taxi Dri­ver, Ser­pi­co, The French Con­nec­tion and oth­er social­ly-con­scious movies of the era in putting New York under the micro­scope, reveal­ing a screech­ing sub­way sys­tem cov­ered in graf­fi­ti, trash-strewn streets and an omnipresent crim­i­nal ele­ment. While the likes of Mid­night Cow­boy and Dog Day After­noon focused on the city’s seedy under­bel­ly, The French Con­nec­tion and Ser­pi­co con­tributed to the mount­ing pub­lic fears around police cor­rup­tion and vio­lence. In a time of wide­spread dis­trust and unease, exas­per­at­ed by Water­gate and the ongo­ing war in Viet­nam, Death Wish rep­re­sent­ed a cathar­tic push back for a para­noid audience.

Two men seated on a train carriage; one man appears to be gesturing or interacting with the other.

While Bron­son had already built a suc­cess­ful career in Europe, in 1970s Amer­i­ca he was still some­thing of a bit-play­er. Death Wish was the first real hit of his career, built on his every­man aura, earthy green eyes and an expres­sion of seri­ous­ness. John Hus­ton described Bronson’s per­for­mance style best: “[He] reminds me of a hand grenade with the pin pulled.” Bron­son car­ried rage and nobil­i­ty well, mak­ing him a sym­pa­thet­ic fig­ure when his wife is mur­dered and his daugh­ter is sex­u­al­ly assault­ed in the first act of Death Wish.

The bru­tal­i­ty of this unex­pect­ed vio­lence fol­lowed by the inep­ti­tude of the law leads mid­dle-class Paul Kersey (Bron­son), a con­sci­en­tious objec­tor dur­ing the Kore­an War, to take mat­ters into his own hands. In spite of some stray com­ments about the slip­pery slope of vig­i­lantes jus­tice, Death Wish sides with its scorned pro­tag­o­nist. The film’s stance is unabashed­ly pro-gun and pro-vig­i­lan­tism, and its pol­i­tics were con­sid­ered dan­ger­ous by many critics.

Judy Klemestrud of The New York Times spoke to sev­er­al movie­go­ers as they exit­ed the the­atre. Sev­er­al stat­ed their desire to pur­chase a gun and many appeared con­vinced that vig­i­lante jus­tice could clean up New York, such as adver­tis­ing sales­man Al Hei­dler, who said, If we had more peo­ple like Bron­son, we would have less crime.” Oth­ers expressed con­cerns over the dis­pro­por­tion­ate vio­lence against black peo­ple in the film, with one audi­ence mem­ber say­ing, This is the worst pic­ture I’ve ever seen in my life. A white man can get away with any­thing in Amer­i­ca. I’ve nev­er seen so much racism in a movie – six blacks get killed for every white.” Yet the respons­es to Death Wish were over­whelm­ing­ly pos­i­tive in an audi­ence that Klemestrud not­ed was pre­dom­i­nant­ly black and work­ing class.

Vig­i­lante films have nev­er real­ly gone out of style, and Death Wish still packs a punch in part because it empow­ers the indi­vid­ual in a soci­ety where the deck seems stacked against them. Such films stoke para­noia, not only hint­ing at the dark­ness lurk­ing under any shad­ow but the imper­son­al­i­ty of an uncar­ing bureau­cra­cy that allows an atmos­phere of vio­lence per­sist. Rather than alle­vi­ate fears, though, a film like Death Wish only engen­ders greater dis­trust and discomfort.

Indeed, vig­i­lante films rarely uplift those who are sta­tis­ti­cal­ly mar­gin­alised by sys­tem­at­ic vio­lence or abuse, instead uphold­ing a sense of jus­tice that priv­i­leges a white mid­dle class. Rather than expose the same forces that might also keep the mid­dle class paci­fied and weak, Death Wish focus its rage on urban spaces and already mar­gin­alised com­mu­ni­ties. With Eli Roth at the helm of this year’s reboot, it seems unlike­ly that pre­vi­ous wrongs will be right­ed at a time when America’s rela­tion­ship with guns and vio­lence is being ques­tioned like nev­er before.

You might like