How Death Line used cannibal horror to expose… | Little White Lies

In Praise Of

How Death Line used can­ni­bal hor­ror to expose social inequality

30 Jul 2017

Words by Thomas Hobbs

Man in dark clothing holding a lantern, standing in a rugged, rocky landscape.
Man in dark clothing holding a lantern, standing in a rugged, rocky landscape.
This 1972 British B‑movie is essen­tial view­ing in the wake of the recent Gren­fell tragedy.

On the sur­face of it, Death Line is a pret­ty con­ven­tion­al idea for a hor­ror movie. A net­work of can­ni­bals are liv­ing under Rus­sell Square tube sta­tion and kid­nap­ping, then mur­der­ing, com­muters. There’s the sar­don­ic cock­ney detec­tive, Inspec­tor Cal­houn (played by a gid­dy Don­ald Pleas­ance), as well as one of the most effec­tive screen mon­sters ever com­mit­ted to cel­lu­loid; Hugh Armstrong’s trans­for­ma­tion as the film’s pri­ma­ry plague-rid­den can­ni­bal will make you feel both dis­gust and empathy.

Look a lit­tle deep­er though, and you’ll find that Gary Sherman’s 1972 film con­tains an odd­ly pre­scient mes­sage about social inequal­i­ty in Lon­don. This begins with seedy, wealthy Con­ser­v­a­tive min­is­ter James Man­fred (played by British sit­com actor James Cossins) hunt­ing for women across London’s Soho sex dis­trict. He treats a woman he meets on the tube like a piece of meat by ask­ing her how much?” before being kicked in the privates.

From the very first scene, a mem­ber of the estab­lish­ment is framed as cor­rupt, with Manfred’s per­ver­sion and hunt for flesh effec­tive expo­si­tion to the can­ni­bal hor­ror that fol­lows. When two stu­dents find Manfred’s uncon­scious body on the plat­form, they rush for help. But by the time they return, it’s too late; some­thing has already car­ried him off into the shad­ows. When Cal­houn is lat­er asked about Manfred’s dis­ap­pear­ance, he replies: What would a big shot like Man­fred be doing on pub­lic trans­port?” The film’s mes­sage is abun­dant­ly clear: politi­cians and their con­stituents are not treat­ed as equals.

Cal­houn is briefed that the site where Man­fred went miss­ing is direct­ly above an aban­doned sta­tion where, back in 1892, a group of work­ing class dig­gers (eight men, four women) were trapped after a ceil­ing col­lapsed. Their bank­rupt con­struc­tion com­pa­ny didn’t both­er to send out a res­cue mis­sion because it would have cost too much money.

This rev­e­la­tion is uncom­fort­ably rel­e­vant 45 years on, with many believ­ing that the recent Gren­fell Tow­er fire – which police say has claimed the lives of more than 80 peo­ple – was caused by the rich aban­don­ing their oblig­a­tions to the poor. In the case of Death Line, this relates to a com­pa­ny fail­ing to pay to dig out their work­ers. In the case of Gren­fell, it relates to the coun­cil report­ed­ly fail­ing to pay for safe cladding and sprin­klers to pro­tect their ten­ants from a fire. The film’s sound­track con­sis­tent­ly fea­tures the haunt­ing sounds of screams and dig­ging; echoes of an indus­tri­al rev­o­lu­tion that has ben­e­fit­ted one side of soci­ety more than the other.

This mes­sage of social inequal­i­ty stretch­es to the estab­lish­ment too. When Cal­hourn inves­ti­gates Manfred’s lux­u­ry apart­ment, Christo­pher Lee’s sar­cas­tic, top-hat-don­ning, MI5 agent con­fronts him. After Cal­hourn says fuck you!” Lee barks back, This is beyond even your work­ing class viril­i­ty. The Man­fred case is closed, are we clear?” This scene all but con­firms a state cov­er-up, and also mir­rors the con­spir­a­cy para­noia that has been cir­cu­lat­ing post-Grenfell.

When Armstrong’s can­ni­bal hide­out is final­ly dis­cov­ered, it’s impos­si­ble not to be unset­tled by the film’s gris­ly prac­ti­cal effects. The squeak­ing of rats rever­ber­ates off dirty walls, mag­gots feast on human flesh and dis­coloured organs hang off hooks as if being dis­played in a high street butch­ers. A preg­nant woman turns blue and takes her last breath as puss-filled warts pul­sate across a face. A cry­ing Arm­strong cra­dles the dying woman and offers her the corpse of Man­fred as sus­te­nance, cut­ting his throat open and feed­ing her the politician’s blood. The two, who speak in inde­ci­pher­able groans, are the last sur­viv­ing mem­bers of a new gen­er­a­tion born from the orig­i­nal work­ers. They’ve been breed­ing and feast­ing off the soci­ety above ground for decades.

Armstrong’s can­ni­bal was orig­i­nal­ly intend­ed to be played by Mar­lon Bran­do, though at no point is it pos­si­ble to see how the leg­endary actor could have bet­tered it. When his can­ni­bal, known as The Man, kid­naps a female stu­dent, he’s torn over whether to eat her or care for her. Mean­while, each of the bod­ies of his can­ni­bal rel­a­tives are shown in a crib – some skele­tal, some decom­pos­ing – lov­ing­ly dec­o­rat­ed with stolen jew­ellery. Even though his acts are obvi­ous­ly bru­tal, there’s a del­i­cate side to his nature too. In many ways, Arm­strong cre­at­ed cinema’s first three-dimen­sion­al can­ni­bal. The Man is a dark evo­lu­tion of Boris Karloff’s Franken­stein monster.

When Cal­hourn final­ly unearths the can­ni­bal lair, he mock­ing­ly laughs at the sight of Manfred’s body, sigh­ing, God, what a way to live.” This line seems to sug­gest that Death Line is using the guise of an enter­tain­ing B‑movie can­ni­bal hor­ror (it was renamed Raw Meat in US and pro­mot­ed using an inac­cu­rate sex­u­alised poster) as a smoke­screen to force view­ers to con­front the even deep­er hor­rors of social inequal­i­ty. Despite being beloved by mod­ern film­mak­ers such as Edgar Wright, Death Line remains a large­ly for­got­ten British mas­ter­piece. Yet its rel­e­vance grows every year the gap between the nation’s rich and poor widens.

You might like

Accessibility Settings

Text

Applies the Open Dyslexic font, designed to improve readability for individuals with dyslexia.

Applies a more readable font throughout the website, improving readability.

Underlines links throughout the website, making them easier to distinguish.

Adjusts the font size for improved readability.

Visuals

Reduces animations and disables autoplaying videos across the website, reducing distractions and improving focus.

Reduces the colour saturation throughout the website to create a more soothing visual experience.

Increases the contrast of elements on the website, making text and interface elements easier to distinguish.