How John Carpenter’s The Thing became a… | Little White Lies

Home Ents

How John Carpenter’s The Thing became a hor­ror/s­ci-fi classic

23 Oct 2017

Words by Anton Bitel

Bearded man in winter gear holding a tool, standing in a dark, snowy environment.
Bearded man in winter gear holding a tool, standing in a dark, snowy environment.
The director’s new­ly-restored 1982 film con­tin­ues to stand the test of time.

John Carpenter’s eighth fea­ture, and his first for a major stu­dio, The Thing is an adap­ta­tion of John W Campbell’s 1938 novel­la Who Goes There?, and a loose remake of Chris Nyby’s adap­ta­tion The Thing from Anoth­er World, scenes from which could be glimpsed on a tele­vi­sion set in Carpenter’s ear­li­er Hal­loween. By coin­ci­dence, it opened in the US on the same day as Rid­ley Scott’s Blade Run­ner, and both films would take some years to win their canon­i­cal sta­tus in the sci-fi pan­theon after an ini­tial drub­bing from the major­i­ty of crit­ics, who at the time were in thrall to Steven Spielberg’s alien-pos­i­tive E.T., released two weeks earlier.

Yet The Thing fell under the far more sin­is­ter influ­ence of anoth­er Scott film, Alien, a sim­i­lar­ly hybridised muta­tion of SF and hor­ror in which an iso­lat­ed work­ing crew has to deal with a dead­ly extrater­res­tri­al men­ace with no out­side help. So remote from civil­i­sa­tion is the US Nation­al Sci­ence Insti­tute Sta­tion in the Antarc­tic that it might as well be in space – and the small team oper­at­ing there finds itself under attack from with­in by an alien (unearthed by Nor­we­gian researchers from a near­by base) that can rapid­ly adapt to its envi­ron­ment and makes per­verse use of its human hosts to dis­guise its own pres­ence. In the ensu­ing may­hem, the base’s del­i­cate ecosys­tem begins irrepara­bly to break down, as the very team who must work togeth­er to con­front this insid­i­ous threat find them­selves no longer able to trust each other.

There are sig­nif­i­cant dif­fer­ences, too. For where Alien boast­ed an on-board com­put­er nick­named Moth­er’, a female pro­tag­o­nist and an egg-born neme­sis, The Thing is set in an all-male envi­ron­ment, and is as much a study of mas­culin­i­ty in cri­sis as an update of the sort of siege sce­nario that Car­pen­ter had already played out in Assault on Precinct 13.

The first time we meet chop­per pilot and hero RJ MacReady (Car­pen­ter reg­u­lar Kurt Rus­sell), a lon­er who lives apart from the rest of the crew’s quar­ters in a shack out­side, he is in the rec room, pour­ing him­self a scotch on ice, and resum­ing a game of chess – not with one of his com­pan­ions, but with the com­put­er. Poor baby, you’re start­ing to lose it,” he com­ments, before the Chess Wiz­ard check­mates him. With his mas­cu­line ego dam­aged, MacReady’s response is to pour his drink into the computer’s cir­cuit­ry, fry­ing it with the words, Cheat­ing bitch.” It is a misog­y­nis­tic slur (accom­pa­nied by an absurd destruc­tive act) against the only pres­ence on the sta­tion that might be deemed female – for the Chess Wiz­ard, despite its mas­cu­line name, has the dis­tinc­tive voice of a woman (in fact Carpenter’s then wife Adri­enne Barbeau).

With that word bitch’ still ring­ing in the audience’s ears, Car­pen­ter cuts away to the husky out­side, rac­ing from its armed Nor­we­gian pur­suers to the rel­a­tive shel­ter of the Amer­i­can sta­tion – and through the mag­i­cal impli­ca­ture of edit­ing, we infer that this new arrival is also a bitch, come to invade this male com­mu­ni­ty with her fem­i­nine oth­er­ness – even as it smug­gles in all the alien cells that will be these men’s ulti­mate undoing.

What fol­lows is a very mod­ern witch hunt, as the station’s men attempt to weed out any trace of that fem­i­nin­i­ty from their ranks, and keep repli­cat­ing MacReady’s angry attack on the com­put­er with a self-destruc­tive scorched earth pol­i­cy that will even­tu­al­ly see them burn­ing their whole base down. In the end, only the man­li­est, most rugged indi­vid­u­al­ists will be left sort-of stand­ing, but even they still eye one anoth­er with mis­trust and sus­pi­cion. After all, nobody is all man (or all woman), and no one can ful­ly escape the alter­i­ty within.

The Thing is right­ly adored for its lived-in ensem­ble per­for­mances, its extra­or­di­nar­i­ly grotesque prac­ti­cal effects (from Rob Bot­tin, with a lit­tle help from Stan Win­ston), its mood of para­noid claus­tro­pho­bia, and the puls­ing elec­tro-ten­sion of its score (Ennio Mor­ri­cone does Car­pen­ter!). Yet there is also an appeal­ing­ly exis­ten­tial qual­i­ty that comes from the soli­tude of its set­ting, the chill win­tri­ness of its cli­mate, and the bleak des­per­a­tion of its char­ac­ters’ predicament.

For these men are pit­ted not just against the ele­ments, but against each oth­er and their own inner, hid­den selves, in an utter­ly unfor­giv­ing milieu. There’s noth­ing else I can do, just wait,” con­cludes MacReady, halfway through the film, on a pri­vate record­ing that he makes as tes­ta­ment, should they all per­ish, of what has hap­pened. This is re-echoed by his last words in the film, deliv­ered as he sits out­side, illu­mi­nat­ed by the fires of the burn­ing camp: Why don’t we just wait here for a lit­tle while, see what happens.”

All this wait­ing, for what? For the death that he knows is com­ing? For God – or Godot? For a sign of whether he and/​or the oth­er sur­vivor have been over­tak­en by the alien, or have been stripped down to their own true selves? In any case, MacReady’s last ges­ture in the film is to pass his bot­tle of J&B to the oth­er sur­vivor. This ges­ture rep­re­sents a kind of check­mate: if either one of them is by now not human, the oth­er will inevitably be infect­ed from shar­ing the bot­tle. Yet, para­dox­i­cal­ly, the ges­ture, as a sig­ni­fi­er of trust and com­mu­nion, proves that a spark of human­i­ty, if not quite of hope, remains.

The Thing is released on 23 Octo­ber by Arrow Video on Blu-ray as a Lim­it­ed Edi­tion Steel­book in a brand new restora­tion from a 4K scan of the orig­i­nal neg­a­tive, super­vised and approved by direc­tor John Car­pen­ter and direc­tor of pho­tog­ra­phy Dean Cundey.

You might like