When did British comedy get so twee? | Little White Lies

When did British com­e­dy get so twee?

27 Sep 2024

Two men with serious expressions standing against a wooden wall in a reddish-toned image.
Two men with serious expressions standing against a wooden wall in a reddish-toned image.
As Shaun of the Dead turns 20, we chart the steady decline of humour in main­stream British filmmaking.

It’s 2004 and Shaun (Simon Pegg) is liv­ing an aim­less exis­tence, shuf­fling from his job sell­ing white goods to local booz­er The Win­ches­ter on an infi­nite loop, much to the cha­grin of his girl­friend Liz (Kate Ash­field). When a zom­bie apoc­a­lypse strikes Lon­don, he final­ly finds him­self with a pur­pose: Take car. Go to Mum’s. Kill Phil, grab Liz, go to The Win­ches­ter, have a nice cold pint, and wait for all of this to blow over. How’s that for a slice of fried gold?”

Cred­it­ed with rean­i­mat­ing the rot­ting corpse of the British film indus­try, Edgar Wright’s Shaun of the Dead delight­ed crit­ics and con­sumers alike, bless­ed­ly com­ing soon after what felt to many like the final nail in the cof­fin for British com­e­dy: Andy Humphries’ Sex Lives of the Pota­to Men. As Shaun of the Dead returns to cin­e­mas for 20th-anniver­sary screen­ings, it’s hard not to look back and think every­thing just seemed bet­ter in 2004. The aver­age price of a pint was £2.36. You could smoke in the pub (okay, maybe not a plus for most patrons). You could – at least accord­ing to Shaun of the Dead – make enough mon­ey as a part-time weed deal­er to rent a room in Crouch End.

Jam-packed with pacy dia­logue, phys­i­cal com­e­dy, and high­ly quotable one-lin­ers, Shaun of the Dead is a com­e­dy steeped in ref­er­ences to its British com­e­dy fore­bears – it’s both an overt cri­tique of an increas­ing­ly Amer­i­can­ised British con­sumer cul­ture and ser­vice indus­try and a light-heart­ed, per­fect­ly mid­dle-brow zom­bie film. The com­e­dy com­ing from the sim­i­lar­i­ties between stag­ger­ing drunk, chron­i­cal­ly lazy Shaun and the zom­bies acts as a gen­uine­ly fun­ny social cri­tique, and it’s easy to see why it was cred­it­ed with bring­ing British com­e­dy back from the dead. But 20 years lat­er, it seems we’re on life sup­port again.

It’s an old com­plaint: nos­tal­gia, it’s not what it used to be. But as we emerge from 14 years of Con­ser­v­a­tive rule, it’s hard not to look back at those years, rife with polit­i­cal scan­dal, and won­der what hap­pened to the com­e­dy that turns the knife on the state. Some would say the polit­i­cal dis­as­ters of the last decade in par­tic­u­lar are beyond ridicule – Peter Capal­di has said you couldn’t make The Thick of It now. But is Britain real­ly beyond satire? Look­ing at the decid­ed­ly mil­que­toast come­dies to come out this year – Wicked Lit­tle Let­ters and Seize Them! – it seems we might be.

Four people standing outside a building. A man in a white shirt and tie, a woman in a blue top, a man in a casual outfit, and a woman in a beige coat.

Rather than take aim at the cur­rent polit­i­cal cli­mate, both films look to the past for their set­ting, with Wicked Lit­tle Let­ters tak­ing place in the 1920s and Seize Them! set in the Dark Ages. Through this they avoid the tricky busi­ness of com­ing down too hard on any­one who might still exist, instead skew­er­ing easy tar­gets that we love to hate: pious old women and brat­ty roy­als. By lam­bast­ing the respectabil­i­ty pol­i­tics of the 1920s and medieval queens, both films avoid the murki­er waters of class pol­i­tics today, instead allow­ing an audi­ence to chor­tle at the past and reflect fond­ly about how far we’ve come.

Both films play it safe in the con­tent of their com­e­dy too: toi­let humour and exces­sive swear­ing abound. Bobik, Nick Frost’s char­ac­ter in Seize Them!, mono­logues about poo for a minute straight. While Ed – his char­ac­ter in Shaun of the Dead – is fond of fart jokes, Ed’s dis­gust­ing­ness is thrown into relief by the long-suf­fer­ing Shaun. The joke is not the fart, the joke is Shaun’s life. But in Seize Them! the joke is just…shit.

This kind of twee, pre­dictable humour is increas­ing­ly threat­en­ing to be our dom­i­nant cul­tur­al export. Writ­ing about the tri­umph of twee, James Mar­riott wrote A love of child­ish things is a mark of demo­c­ra­t­ic taste and an aver­sion to pom­pos­i­ty. Britain, with its long tra­di­tion of anti-intel­lec­tu­al­ism, is espe­cial­ly vul­ner­a­ble.” Where does this leave com­e­dy? Well, five years ago, Chris Mor­ris iden­ti­fied the prob­lem: we’ve got used to a kind of satire that essen­tial­ly pla­cates the court. In lieu of satiris­ing the ridicu­lous­ness of our times à la Shaun of the Dead or Four Lions, today’s come­dies encour­age us instead to laugh fond­ly at our own reflec­tion. By refus­ing to come down on either side – Seize Them! presents the leader of the peas­ant upris­ing Hum­ble Joan as just as evil and oppor­tunis­tic as the Queen – the films appeal to the lib­er­al mid­dle. If there are any bad­dies’, these films sug­gest, it’s any­one who dares to veer from that position.

And it’s not an exag­ger­a­tion to say that it’s risky to devi­ate from that dom­i­nant cul­tur­al posi­tion: fund­ing for Belfast group Kneecap (who starred in one of 2024’s bet­ter comedic efforts) was blocked by the UK gov­ern­ment, in a move that has dis­turb­ing echoes of the Broad­cast­ing Ban of the 1980s, which banned Sinn Féin spokes­peo­ple from speak­ing on tele­vi­sion or radio. Ear­li­er this year, the Arts Coun­cil Eng­land changed its word­ing to remove fund­ing for polit­i­cal artists, before chang­ing it back in response to the backlash.

Who can afford to make polit­i­cal art in 2024? With work­ing-class peo­ple being increas­ing­ly priced out of the arts, and fund­ing becom­ing wor­ry­ing­ly con­tin­gent on your will­ing­ness to stay in line, most film­mak­ers who seek to cri­tique the estab­lish­ment do so from a posi­tion with­in it. So per­haps it’s not sur­pris­ing that many of them are more com­fort­able emu­lat­ing the elite than tru­ly skew­er­ing them. Despite pur­port­ing to be a vicious satire of the idle rich” Salt­burn can’t help but delight in its rag­tag band of toffs. With nation­al trea­sures Richard E. Grant and Rosamund Pike cast in the roles with the best lines, the film seems to turn around and say: yes, they’re a bit eccen­tric, but aren’t posh peo­ple fun?

It’s not that films like Wicked Lit­tle Let­ters and Seize Them! are total­ly unen­joy­able – the box office suc­cess of Wicked Lit­tle Let­ters speaks for itself. In fact, they are nice enough to have on in the back­ground and let wash over you. Maybe every­thing is going to be okay, you find your­self think­ing. There’s an argu­ment to be made that in the cur­rent polit­i­cal cli­mate, these are exact­ly the films peo­ple reach for: warm, bland, for­get­table films that tell you every­thing will be okay. But you only have to look at Paddington’s appro­pri­a­tion as a Tory mas­cot to see how eas­i­ly the twee ide­ol­o­gy can become a vehi­cle for conservatism.

With anoth­er Padding­ton film out lat­er this year, the future looks bleak. But let’s hope that a new gov­ern­ment will ush­er in a new era of polit­i­cal satire – God knows we’ve got enough mate­r­i­al to work with.

You might like