Why Wendy and Lucy remains a vital piece of… | Little White Lies

In Praise Of

Why Wendy and Lucy remains a vital piece of Amer­i­can cinema

01 Mar 2017

Words by Joel Blackledge

A young boy wearing a checked shirt and backpack, walking through a wooded area with dappled sunlight filtering through the trees.
A young boy wearing a checked shirt and backpack, walking through a wooded area with dappled sunlight filtering through the trees.
Kel­ly Reichardt’s low-key anti-dra­ma from 2008 offers a sober­ing look at pover­ty in small town USA.

While the past decade has ush­ered in a whole ros­ter of inno­v­a­tive Amer­i­can indie film­mak­ers, few bod­ies of work are so con­sis­tent­ly first-rate as that of Kel­ly Reichardt. Qui­et­ly and steadi­ly, her name has become a short­hand for a par­tic­u­lar brand of film­mak­ing that inter­ro­gates America’s past and present with rare insight and intel­lect. Her new film, Cer­tain Women, is her third col­lab­o­ra­tion with Michelle Williams, a fruit­ful actor-direc­tor pair­ing that began with the min­i­mal­ist mas­ter­piece Wendy and Lucy, from 2008.

The itin­er­ant Wendy (Williams) lives out of her car with her dog Lucy. They are head­ing north to Alas­ka in search of work in a salmon can­nery. The car breaks down, strand­ing them in a poor Ore­gon town, and then Lucy goes miss­ing. With finan­cial prob­lems mount­ing up, Wendy is left at the mer­cy of the local res­i­dents, whose own kind­ness­es and cru­el­ties have a dis­pro­por­tion­ate impact on the vul­ner­a­ble traveler.

While any film involv­ing a lost dog sounds primed to tug at the heart­strings, both the sto­ry and its telling are point­ed­ly undra­mat­ic. In an ear­ly scene, Wendy is has­sled by an aged secu­ri­ty guard for sleep­ing in the car park. But this is no vin­dic­tive author­i­ty fig­ure – rather he is sym­pa­thet­ic and help­ful, as he knows some­thing about eco­nom­ic hard­ship. Lat­er the two bond, almost hud­dling togeth­er beneath the win­dow­less con­crete wall he guards, observ­ing the slow, qui­et demise of a small town.

Wendy shoplifts dog food and is caught by a teenage shop assis­tant who self-right­eous­ly insists on the rule of law – to the qui­et regret of the more world-weary man­ag­er. Wendy is arrest­ed and released – a process char­ac­terised by bore­dom and bureau­cra­cy – in the mean­time los­ing her mon­ey, her dog, and the oppor­tu­ni­ty to fix her car. The shop assis­tant is lat­er seen get­ting picked up by his moth­er as he leaves work; this tiny, oth­er­wise unre­mark­able detail speaks vol­umes about the mean­ing of free­dom in a soci­ety organ­ised so com­plete­ly around privilege.

Even­tu­al­ly Wendy vis­its the local mechan­ic, who instead of fix­ing the car declares it a write-off. Wendy has to let go of the one thing that would enable her to leave the town, but she doesn’t argue. She knows it would be use­less to direct her ire at the mechan­ic. Like the secu­ri­ty guard who moves her, the shop assis­tant who detains her, and the police who arrest her, he’s just doing his job. Yet how can a sys­tem where every­one works as they should leaves some so dispossessed?

The film was shot on a mere $200,000 with a bare bones cast and crew (includ­ing Reichardt’s own dog Lucy in the title role). This doesn’t equate to a com­pro­mised vision, though. The style is sim­ple but con­sid­ered, and while Reichardt draws on social real­ist cin­e­mas from both Italy and the UK, the film car­ries a stonewashed aes­thet­ic that is dis­tinct­ly Amer­i­can. The per­for­mances are nat­u­ral­is­tic and the loca­tions unor­na­ment­ed. Reichardt even for­goes a musi­cal score in favour of the sound of pass­ing trains.

On this foun­da­tion­al real­ism Reichardt con­structs an authen­tic, com­pas­sion­ate sto­ry of which Williams is a vital com­po­nent. She appears con­vinc­ing­ly weary from life on the road, hold­ing back a tor­rent of exhaus­tion behind an expres­sion of strained accep­tance. Wendy is an eco­nom­ic migrant pushed to seek out a job that doesn’t require an address or a qual­i­fi­ca­tion, and that might pay enough to buy her some of the free­dom her coun­try claims to stock in such great supply.

Beyond this, though, we’re not shown any­thing by way of a back­sto­ry. Our view of events is lim­it­ed to just a few days, and when Wendy vis­its the local pound in search of Lucy, a steady track­ing shot of all the oth­er lost dogs serves to remind us of the mil­lions more Wendys in small towns across Amer­i­ca. Indeed, though it doesn’t lean on a par­tic­u­lar ide­ol­o­gy, this is a fierce­ly polit­i­cal film in which the stakes of pol­i­tics are the every­day lived expe­ri­ence: dol­lar bills exchanged between hands, a blank form wait­ing to be filled, or the aisle of a super­mar­ket where shop­pers do men­tal arith­metic to fig­ure out what they can go with­out this week.

Wendy and Lucy lays bare the real­i­ty that pover­ty is a con­di­tion of cir­cum­stance rather than char­ac­ter, and that empa­thy, backed by a degree of out­rage, is the only appro­pri­ate response.

You might like