Why The Day the Earth Caught Fire still stuns 55… | Little White Lies

Why The Day the Earth Caught Fire still stuns 55 years on

16 Aug 2016

Words by Joel Blackledge

Two individuals, a man and a woman, standing together in a doorway. They appear to be wearing light-coloured clothing. The image is in black and white.
Two individuals, a man and a woman, standing together in a doorway. They appear to be wearing light-coloured clothing. The image is in black and white.
Once deemed too strong for gen­er­al con­sump­tion, this apoc­a­lyp­tic sci-fi is as rel­e­vant and pow­er­ful as ever.

Though 21st cen­tu­ry sci­ence fic­tion cin­e­ma has shown us many imag­i­na­tive and ter­ri­fy­ing pos­si­bil­i­ties for how the world will end, one of the most com­pelling apoc­a­lyp­tic visions ever arrived in British cin­e­mas 55 years ago. At first, the premise of The Day the Earth Caught Fire sounds as schlocky as its title: simul­ta­ne­ous nuclear weapons tests have sent the Earth spin­ning towards the sun. How­ev­er, vet­er­an genre direc­tor Val Guest tells the sto­ry with authen­tic­i­ty that is strik­ing even today.

The film explores Atom­ic Age cyn­i­cism about the con­se­quences of the Cold War, which was typ­i­cal of dis­as­ter movies of the time. But instead of wor­ried sci­en­tists or noble fire fight­ers, we see things from the per­spec­tive of Peter Sten­ning (Edward Judd), a jad­ed jour­nal­ist stum­bling between a failed mar­riage, an alco­hol addic­tion and his exas­per­at­ed boss­es at the Dai­ly Express. This choice of pro­tag­o­nist speaks to the film’s cyn­i­cal side­ways glance at the end of the world.

When Sten­ning starts inves­ti­gat­ing strange mete­o­ro­log­i­cal events he uncov­ers the scoop of the year, along with a renewed sense of pur­pose – just as Lon­don starts get­ting very hot very quick­ly. At first the capital’s response is the same as it is any sum­mer: slap on sun scream and fill every last patch of green space with boozy pic­nics. But when the water starts to run out and mist cov­ers the city, pan­ic sets in. Any­one who has expe­ri­enced a British heat wave will recog­nise the tra­jec­to­ry: cel­e­bra­tion turns to exhaus­tion and we are remind­ed that there is only so much hot weath­er than this island can tolerate.

The Day the Earth Caught Fire remains a fas­ci­nat­ing and fright­en­ing­ly believ­able depic­tion of Lon­don caught in a cli­mat­ic and bureau­crat­ic night­mare. Mis­er­able queues for water rations line a dried-up Thames, while impas­sioned CND protests descend into vio­lence. A mixed use of real loca­tions and mat­te paint­ings track a swift and slip­pery descent from bustling metrop­o­lis to hope­less wasteland.

The busi­ness of jour­nal­ism is told with authen­tic verve, from the per­fect­ly recre­at­ed Dai­ly Express offices to the smoky Fleet Street bar where the hacks spend most of their time. Real-life Express edi­tor Arthur Chris­tiansen even plays a ver­sion of him­self, and while his act­ing abil­i­ty brings to mind Dean Lern­er more than any­one else he cer­tain­ly lends an urgent cred­i­bil­i­ty to the news­room briefings.

In 1961 Lon­don had not quite set­tled into its Swing­ing’ iden­ti­ty, and the film evi­dences anx­i­ety about the decade ahead. The city’s hip youth are dan­ger­ous­ly unpre­dictable; their reck­less aban­don is so fierce that they have water fights in the mid­dle of a drought. Yet there is sim­i­lar scep­ti­cism towards politi­cians, denounced by one char­ac­ter as stu­pid, crazy, irre­spon­si­ble bas­tards’. Pig-head­ed in their mil­i­tarism and reduc­tive in the euphemistic plat­i­tudes they use to calm the pop­u­lace, the off-screen estab­lish­ment are dis­dained in a man­ner that undoes the patri­ot­ic tra­jec­to­ry of British cin­e­ma of the 1950s.

In gen­er­al, Britain is depict­ed as a frag­ment­ed place where threads of togeth­er­ness are frag­ile, and the lie of nation­hood can come apart in the face of dis­as­ter. Hero­ism is in small sup­ply, but it does qui­et­ly per­sist in some cul­tur­al tra­di­tions: keep your cool, main­tain per­spec­tive, and hold your drink despite insur­mount­able forces of cat­a­stro­phe. It is a small­er, snarki­er, and more British take on dis­as­ter than film audi­ences have become accus­tomed to.

Per­haps under­stand­ably giv­en its age, cer­tain aspects of the film have not dat­ed well – name­ly the gen­der pol­i­tics – but a warm­ing world still has much to learn from it. It is grim­ly appro­pri­ate that the film’s 55th anniver­sary should fall in 2016, a year when mad­ness, cri­sis and intol­er­a­ble heat have returned to Britain with aplomb. It’s also the year that the British par­lia­ment decid­ed to renew the con­tro­ver­sial nuclear pro­gramme, Tri­dent, and though their deci­sion may not throw us spin­ning towards the sun the con­se­quences of nuclear war are no less ter­ri­fy­ing than they were half a cen­tu­ry ago.

In its final scenes, The Day the Earth Caught Fire turns from mono­chrome to a scorched yel­low tint, as if the sun is burn­ing up the film itself. A chill­ing ambigu­ous cli­max ends unusu­al­ly with­out a sin­gle cred­it or title card. Instead there is just a fade to black, ush­er­ing in a future that could spell deliv­er­ance or destruc­tion for the entire planet.

You might like