In praise of Stories We Tell | Little White Lies

In Praise Of

In praise of Sto­ries We Tell

06 Feb 2023

Words by Cici Peng

A smiling woman with long blonde hair holding a microphone in a room with a TV and cluttered surfaces.
A smiling woman with long blonde hair holding a microphone in a room with a TV and cluttered surfaces.
Sarah Pol­ley’s inno­v­a­tive, heart­felt doc­u­men­tary about her moth­er is a thought­ful exer­cise in the mechan­ics of storytelling.

At the begin­ning of Sarah Polley’s Sto­ries We Tell, an auto­bi­o­graph­i­cal doc­u­men­tary about her fam­i­ly, the film­mak­er asks her dad Michael to read out the mem­oir he’s writ­ten. He begins by recit­ing a pas­sage from Mar­garet Atwood’s Alias Grace: When you’re in the mid­dle of a sto­ry it isn’t a sto­ry at all but only a con­fu­sion, a dark roar­ing, a blind­ness… it’s only after­wards that it becomes any­thing like a sto­ry at all, when you’re telling it to your­self or to some­one else.” As Michael reads, grainy clips of joy rise up on our screen in quick suc­ces­sion: a beau­ti­ful woman laugh­ing with her whole body; peo­ple danc­ing and smok­ing; a man float­ing in a glis­ten­ing pool. They evade us, these chaot­ic images wait­ing to be explained.

Every time I watch this doc­u­men­tary, I glean anoth­er lay­er of mean­ing. Ini­tial­ly, I under­stood Atwood’s words as describ­ing the pow­er of lan­guage to cre­ate mean­ing, how it allows us to shape our exis­tence through our per­ceived nar­ra­tive troughs and arcs. Yet, hear­ing it again, I also recog­nise how Michael’s words are punc­tu­at­ed by the melan­choly of loss – with each moment, we slip fur­ther from our present, and feel its absence in the form of frag­ment­ed images of the past that we call mem­o­ry. With this doc­u­men­tary, Pol­ley express­es the need to run towards the con­fu­sion in order to make sense of it. Pol­ley is inter­est­ed in sto­ry­telling and how it expos­es the space that exists between real­i­ty and our vary­ing rep­re­sen­ta­tions of the past. Yet, lying beneath this for­mal desire, there’s a sense of her inti­mate need to under­stand her­self through the loss of her mother.

Polley’s doc­u­men­tary revolves around the life of her vibrant moth­er and stage actress Diane, who died of can­cer when she was 11. She decides that the best way to tell this sto­ry and to under­stand Diane is through the voic­es of her fam­i­ly mem­bers and friends. Pol­ley gives each sto­ry­teller equal weight to tell their ver­sion, assert­ing that sto­ries are born out of a cacoph­o­ny of voic­es. As the film con­tin­ues, we learn about Diane’s com­plex rela­tion­ship with her hus­band Michael and her affair which result­ed in Sarah’s birth. Out of this dis­cov­ery, Sarah seeks out her bio­log­i­cal father and dis­cov­ers that Har­ry Gulkin, an acclaimed Cana­di­an film pro­duc­er, was her mother’s lover – yet this messy secret at the cen­tre of the film is not the point of the doc­u­men­tary and bare­ly cap­tures the film’s mystery.

As Pol­ley asks each of her par­tic­i­pants to tell the sto­ry from begin­ning to end, as if I don’t know what hap­pens”, we see them reach into a shared past that grows more com­plex with each rev­e­la­tion. These char­ac­ters become famil­iar to us through the ways they evoke their own iden­ti­ties in rela­tion to Diane, as they reveal their own idio­syn­crat­ic ways of judg­ing the past. Watch­ing Polley’s inscrutable face as she lis­tens to Michael recount his sto­ry with Diane with equal parts of self-lac­er­at­ing humour and emo­tion is sur­pris­ing­ly moving.

Pol­ley does not attempt to smooth over con­tra­dic­tions that arise in dif­fer­ent accounts. Instead, the film reveals that the idea of truth is not neat or fixed. As Diane’s loved ones give diverg­ing def­i­n­i­tions of her per­son­al­i­ty – with one friend claim­ing that Diane was guile­less while anoth­er divulges that she was secre­tive, that she knew she was dying and that she didn’t, that she was elat­ed to be preg­nant and that she want­ed to abort – we realise that all accounts are true. It is only by allow­ing each of the sto­ry­tellers to author’ their own ver­sion of Diane that Pol­ley begins to under­stand this messy and real image of her mother.

In one sequence, her sis­ter Joan­na sighs, There are a lot of these ques­tions about Who was she?’ There’s this mis­con­cep­tion that she was some­thing.” By attend­ing to Diane’s inde­fin­abil­i­ty, Pol­ley builds a por­trait of a woman who was both inde­pen­dent, chas­ing her own desires, while locked into her role as a moth­er and wife. Refus­ing sta­sis, our under­stand­ing of Diane becomes expan­sive, and we feel her com­plex, res­onat­ing presence.

Elderly man with glasses speaking into a microphone in a recording studio setting.

Even while Polley’s direc­to­r­i­al con­trol is evi­dent as she ques­tions and probes, she does not posi­tion her­self as an inter­roga­tor seek­ing to weed out voic­es to reach the truth. Sub­vert­ing the norms of a doc­u­men­tary which place the direc­tor in the posi­tion of utmost con­trol, Sto­ries We Tell expos­es how hier­ar­chi­cal struc­tures can mar real­i­ty by smooth­ing over moments of dis­ac­cord for the per­fect” nar­ra­tive. Indeed, when she asks her bio­log­i­cal father, Har­ry, what he thinks of her method of col­lab­o­ra­tive doc­u­men­tary-mak­ing, he says, I don’t like it, you can’t ever touch bottom…The cru­cial func­tion of art is to tell the truth.” Yet, this is exact­ly what Pol­ley is attempt­ing to do, through a fem­i­nist form of film­mak­ing that democ­ra­tis­es sto­ry­telling and coun­ters the idea of objec­tive truth’ pre­sent­ed through a God-like autho­r­i­al voice.

Emerg­ing out of Polley’s reck­on­ing with mem­o­ry is her need to know her moth­er. It’s an unspo­ken desire that colours each scene in the film. In an email to Michael, Pol­ley asks, Is this the tsuna­mi she unleashed when she went, and all of us still flail­ing in the wake? Try­ing to put her togeth­er in the wreck­age and her slip­ping away from us, over and over again just as we begin to see her face.” As Pol­ley reads, a video of her moth­er at the beach wav­ing her arms floats up.

In Polley’s images, we sense the evi­dence of life, as well as of the pow­er of sto­ries to res­ur­rect Diane. The edit­ing between the archival footage and the inter­views seem to col­lapse the dis­tance between the present and the past. In one scene, a close-up image of Polley’s face cuts to a black-and-white close-up of Diane’s face titled towards her right, as if look­ing back towards her daugh­ter, leap­ing across time.

Polley’s visu­al palimpses­ts are com­posed of both real footage and reen­act­ed scenes filmed on Super‑8 – where the fic­tion­al footage appears ghost­ly, with look-alike actors of Diane, Michael, and Har­ry. It’s easy to miss the fact that they are reen­act­ed footage until we see a clip of Pol­ley direct­ing her actors. The footage is charged with Polley’s attempt to work through and author” her past that was so care­ful­ly con­cealed – her mother’s affair. A re-enact­ed scene of Polley’s bio­log­i­cal par­ents’ first meet­ing is con­stant­ly repeat­ed as the nar­ra­tive grows, and we sense Pol­ley work­ing through her past by restor­ing it visu­al­ly in a form that promis­es permanence.

Towards the end, Pol­ley lets the cam­era linger on the faces of her sib­lings and her fathers, their expres­sions offer­ing up oceans of feel­ing – tes­ta­ments to the endur­ing effects of her loss. Despite the grief, Sto­ries We Tell emerges lumi­nes­cent: even while we come into the world alone, we leave our­selves behind in oth­ers, undoubt­ed­ly con­nect­ed across the spheres of life and death through the endur­ing love we share.

You might like